• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

窗户标识减少鸟类与窗户碰撞的实地测试效果

Field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions.

作者信息

Riggs Georgia J, Barton Christine M, Riding Corey S, O'Connell Timothy J, Loss Scott R

机构信息

Department of Natural Resource Ecology and Management, Oklahoma State University, 008C Ag Hall, Stillwater, OK USA.

Natural Resource Ecology Laboratory, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO USA.

出版信息

Urban Ecosyst. 2022 Dec 24:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s11252-022-01304-w.

DOI:10.1007/s11252-022-01304-w
PMID:36588777
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9789516/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

Bird-window collisions are a major source of human-caused mortality for which there are multiple mitigation and prevention options available. Despite growing availability of products designed to reduce collisions (e.g., glass with etched patterns or markers and films adhered over existing glass), few replicated field tests have been conducted to assess their effectiveness after installation on glass. We conducted a field study to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercially marketed product (Feather Friendly markers) in reducing bird-window collisions at glass-walled bus shelters in Stillwater, Oklahoma, USA. This study included a before-after control-impact (BACI) analysis comparing numbers of collisions at 18 bus shelters in both pre-treatment (2016) and post-treatment (2020) periods, and an analysis comparing 18 treated and 18 untreated shelters during 2020. For the BACI analysis, collisions were significantly reduced between 2016 and 2020 at shelters treated with the Feather Friendly markers even though collisions increased at shelters that remained untreated. For the 2020 analysis, there were significantly fewer collisions at treated than untreated shelters. Relative to a baseline study in 2016, we estimated that treating half of Stillwater's bus shelters resulted in a 64% reduction in total annual bird collisions. Together, these analyses provide a rigorous field test of the effectiveness of this treatment option in reducing bird-window collisions. Our research provides a model for similar studies at both bus shelters and buildings to evaluate and compare products designed to reduce bird-window collisions, and therefore, contribute to reducing this major mortality source affecting bird populations.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11252-022-01304-w.

摘要

未标注

鸟类与窗户碰撞是人为造成鸟类死亡的一个主要原因,针对这一问题有多种缓解和预防措施。尽管旨在减少碰撞的产品越来越多(例如,带有蚀刻图案或标记的玻璃以及粘贴在现有玻璃上的薄膜),但很少有重复的实地测试来评估这些产品安装在玻璃上后的有效性。我们进行了一项实地研究,以评估一种商业销售产品(羽毛友好型标记)在美国俄克拉荷马州斯蒂尔沃特市玻璃墙公交候车亭减少鸟类与窗户碰撞方面的有效性。这项研究包括一个前后对照影响(BACI)分析,比较了18个公交候车亭在预处理期(2016年)和后处理期(2020年)的碰撞数量,以及在2020年对18个处理过的候车亭和18个未处理的候车亭进行的比较分析。对于BACI分析,尽管未处理的候车亭碰撞数量增加,但在使用羽毛友好型标记处理过的候车亭中,2016年至2020年期间碰撞数量显著减少。对于2020年的分析,处理过的候车亭的碰撞数量明显少于未处理的候车亭。相对于2016年的基线研究,我们估计对斯蒂尔沃特市一半的公交候车亭进行处理可使每年鸟类碰撞总数减少64%。总之,这些分析为这种减少鸟类与窗户碰撞的处理选项的有效性提供了严格的实地测试。我们的研究为公交候车亭和建筑物的类似研究提供了一个模型,以评估和比较旨在减少鸟类与窗户碰撞的产品,从而有助于减少这一影响鸟类种群的主要死亡来源。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11252-022-01304-w获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ce/9789516/b9d323279bea/11252_2022_1304_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ce/9789516/b9c443567008/11252_2022_1304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ce/9789516/e1c770fa3a1a/11252_2022_1304_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ce/9789516/b9d323279bea/11252_2022_1304_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ce/9789516/b9c443567008/11252_2022_1304_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ce/9789516/e1c770fa3a1a/11252_2022_1304_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33ce/9789516/b9d323279bea/11252_2022_1304_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Field-testing effectiveness of window markers in reducing bird-window collisions.窗户标识减少鸟类与窗户碰撞的实地测试效果
Urban Ecosyst. 2022 Dec 24:1-11. doi: 10.1007/s11252-022-01304-w.
2
Magnitude and correlates of bird collisions at glass bus shelters in an urban landscape.城市景观中玻璃公交候车亭鸟类碰撞的规模及其相关因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):e0178667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178667. eCollection 2017.
3
Bird protection treatments reduce bird-window collision risk at low-rise buildings within a Pacific coastal protected area.鸟类保护措施降低了太平洋沿海保护区内低层建筑的鸟类撞窗风险。
PeerJ. 2022 Mar 22;10:e13142. doi: 10.7717/peerj.13142. eCollection 2022.
4
Winter bird-window collisions: mitigation success, risk factors, and implementation challenges.冬季鸟类与窗户碰撞:缓解成效、风险因素及实施挑战
PeerJ. 2019 Sep 2;7:e7620. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7620. eCollection 2019.
5
Bird-window collisions: Mitigation efficacy and risk factors across two years.鸟类与窗户碰撞:两年间的缓解效果及风险因素
PeerJ. 2021 Jul 28;9:e11867. doi: 10.7717/peerj.11867. eCollection 2021.
6
Bird-window collisions: different fall and winter risk and protective factors.鸟类与窗户碰撞:秋冬季节不同的风险及保护因素
PeerJ. 2020 Jun 19;8:e9401. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9401. eCollection 2020.
7
Factors influencing bird-building collisions in the downtown area of a major North American city.影响北美主要城市市中心鸟类筑巢碰撞的因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 6;14(11):e0224164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224164. eCollection 2019.
8
Using citizen science to identify environmental correlates of bird-window collisions in Poland.利用公民科学识别波兰鸟类与窗户碰撞的环境相关因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 10;811:152358. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152358. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
9
Patterns of bird-window collisions inform mitigation on a university campus.鸟类与窗户碰撞的模式为大学校园的缓解措施提供了依据。
PeerJ. 2016 Feb 1;4:e1652. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1652. eCollection 2016.
10
Bird-Window Collisions at a West-Coast Urban Park Museum: Analyses of Bird Biology and Window Attributes from Golden Gate Park, San Francisco.西海岸城市公园博物馆中的鸟类与窗户碰撞事件:对旧金山金门公园鸟类生物学和窗户属性的分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0144600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144600. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
To mitigate bird collisions, enforce the Migratory Bird Treaty Act.为减少鸟类碰撞事件,执行《候鸟条约法案》。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Feb 27;121(9):e2320411121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2320411121. Epub 2024 Feb 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Stakeholder perceptions of bird-window collisions.利益相关者对鸟撞窗的看法。
PLoS One. 2022 Feb 10;17(2):e0263447. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263447. eCollection 2022.
2
Drivers of fatal bird collisions in an urban center.城市中心导致鸟类致命碰撞的因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Jun 15;118(24). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2101666118.
3
Multi-scale temporal variation in bird-window collisions in the central United States.美国中部鸟类与窗户碰撞的多尺度时间变化。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 26;11(1):11062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89875-0.
4
Bird-window collisions: different fall and winter risk and protective factors.鸟类与窗户碰撞:秋冬季节不同的风险及保护因素
PeerJ. 2020 Jun 19;8:e9401. doi: 10.7717/peerj.9401. eCollection 2020.
5
Climate change effects on biodiversity, ecosystems, ecosystem services, and natural resource management in the United States.气候变化对美国生物多样性、生态系统、生态系统服务和自然资源管理的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Sep 1;733:137782. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137782. Epub 2020 Mar 10.
6
Factors influencing bird-building collisions in the downtown area of a major North American city.影响北美主要城市市中心鸟类筑巢碰撞的因素。
PLoS One. 2019 Nov 6;14(11):e0224164. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224164. eCollection 2019.
7
Winter bird-window collisions: mitigation success, risk factors, and implementation challenges.冬季鸟类与窗户碰撞:缓解成效、风险因素及实施挑战
PeerJ. 2019 Sep 2;7:e7620. doi: 10.7717/peerj.7620. eCollection 2019.
8
Factors influencing experimental estimation of scavenger removal and observer detection in bird-window collision surveys.影响鸟类撞窗调查中清除者去除和观察者检测实验估计的因素。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Dec;28(8):2119-2129. doi: 10.1002/eap.1800. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
9
Bird-building collision risk: An assessment of the collision risk of birds with buildings by phylogeny and behavior using two citizen-science datasets.鸟类与建筑物碰撞风险:利用两个公民科学数据集,通过系统发育和行为评估鸟类与建筑物碰撞的风险。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0201558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201558. eCollection 2018.
10
Magnitude and correlates of bird collisions at glass bus shelters in an urban landscape.城市景观中玻璃公交候车亭鸟类碰撞的规模及其相关因素。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 1;12(6):e0178667. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0178667. eCollection 2017.