Baker John, Kendal Sarah, Berzins Kathryn, Canvin Krysia, Branthonne-Foster Stella, McDougall Tim, Goldson Barry, Kellar Ian, Wright Judy, Duxbury Joy
University of Leeds Leeds UK.
Expert by Experience.
Child Soc. 2022 Nov;36(6):1351-1401. doi: 10.1111/chso.12581. Epub 2022 May 24.
Restrictive practices are often used harmfully with children in institutional settings. Interventions to reduce their use do not appear to have been mapped systematically. Using environmental scanning, we conducted a broad-scope mapping review of English language academic databases, websites and social media, using systematic methods. Included records ( = 121) were mostly from the United States and contained details of 82 different interventions. Children's participation was limited. Reporting quality was inconsistent, which undermined claims of effectiveness. Overall, despite a multitude of interventions, evidence is limited. Leaders should consider the evidence, including children's perspectives, before introducing poorly understood interventions into children's settings.
在机构环境中,限制性措施常常被有害地用于儿童身上。减少这些措施使用的干预措施似乎尚未得到系统梳理。我们通过环境扫描,运用系统方法对英语学术数据库、网站和社交媒体进行了一次广泛的梳理性综述。纳入的记录(n = 121)大多来自美国,包含82种不同干预措施的详细信息。儿童的参与有限。报告质量参差不齐,这削弱了有关有效性的说法。总体而言,尽管有大量干预措施,但证据有限。在将理解不足的干预措施引入儿童环境之前,领导者应考虑相关证据,包括儿童的观点。