Chinnasamy Alagesan, Ramalingam Karthikeyan, Nayak Sushruth, Rai Vikrant, Gopinath Vidhya, Chawla Gurveen
Independent Researcher, 9 SA, Jains Kences, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Department of Oral Pathology, Saveetha Dental College, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Chennai, India.
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2022 Jul-Sep;26(3):366-369. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_302_22. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Although oral cancer is multifactorial in origin only few had evaluated the diagnostic parameters for candidal infection in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).
To compare and assess the accuracy of Calcofluor White (CFW) to that of conventional staining methods to identify the presence of candidal infection in OSCC.
Archival collections of 43 OSCC were retrieved for this investigation. Standard staining protocol was followed for the index test (CFW) and reference standard (Periodic Acid Schiff). Two examiners were blinded for either one of the staining techniques. Diagnostic test evaluation and Kappa statistic was calculated using MedCalc software.
The study comprised 37 males, six females, and their mean age at the time of presentation was 51 (range 23 to 75 years). The sensitivity and specificity of CFW was 75.8% (CI 57.7 to 88.9%) and 10.0% (CI 0.2 to 44.5%). While the positive predictive and negative predictive values were 63.1% (CI - 50.6-74.0%) and 67.0% (CI - 49.2-81.0%).
Our results show minimal agreement with PAS with a Kappa score of 0.148 (95% CI = 0.39 to 0.09). Overall detection rate was similar for both the index test and reference standard although there was considerable number of intermediate test results. Sensitivity of CFW was comparable to that of earlier studies but specificity was low and the degree of concordance was 60.4%. Although CFW staining can come with high false positive they are a useful test for ruling out candida infection when the test result is negative.
尽管口腔癌的发病是多因素的,但仅有少数研究评估了口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)中念珠菌感染的诊断参数。
比较并评估荧光增白剂(CFW)与传统染色方法在识别OSCC中念珠菌感染方面的准确性。
本研究检索了43例OSCC的存档标本。对指标检测(CFW)和参考标准(过碘酸希夫染色)采用标准染色方案。两位检查者对其中一种染色技术不知情。使用MedCalc软件计算诊断试验评估和kappa统计量。
该研究包括37名男性和6名女性,他们就诊时的平均年龄为51岁(范围23至75岁)。CFW的敏感性和特异性分别为75.8%(95%可信区间57.7%至88.9%)和10.0%(95%可信区间0.2%至44.5%)。阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为63.1%(95%可信区间-50.6%至74.0%)和67.0%(95%可信区间-49.2%至81.0%)。
我们的结果显示与过碘酸希夫染色的一致性极小,kappa评分为0.148(95%可信区间=0.39至0.09)。尽管有相当数量的中间检测结果,但指标检测和参考标准的总体检出率相似。CFW的敏感性与早期研究相当,但特异性较低,一致性程度为60.4%。尽管CFW染色可能会出现较高的假阳性,但当检测结果为阴性时,它们是排除念珠菌感染的有用检测方法。