Mota João, Martins João, Onofre Marcos
Centro de Estudos em Educação, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, Cruz-Quebrada-Dafundo, Oeiras, Portugal.
UIDEF, Instituto de Educação, Lisbon, Portugal.
Front Sports Act Living. 2022 Dec 15;4:1033648. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2022.1033648. eCollection 2022.
Aims of these studies were to develop the Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment Observation instrument (PPLA-O) to assess the physical and part of the cognitive domain of Physical Literacy (PL) through data collected routinely by Physical Education (PE) teachers; and to assess the construct validity (dimensionality, measurement invariance, and convergent and discriminant validity) and score reliability of one of its modules [Movement Competence, Rules, and Tactics (MCRT)].
Content analysis of the Portuguese PE syllabus and literature review were used for PPLA-O domain identification. Multidimensional Item Response Theory (MIRT) models were used to assess construct validity and reliability, along with bivariate correlations in a sample of 515 Portuguese grade 10-12 students ( = 16, SD = 1).
PPLA-O development resulted in an instrument with two modules: MCRT (22 physical activities) and Health-Related Fitness (HRF; 5 protocols); both assessed with teacher-reported data entered in a spreadsheet. A two correlated dimensions Graded Response Model (Manipulative-based Activities [MA], and Stability-based Activities [SA]) showed best fit to the MCRT data, suggesting measurement invariance across sexes, and adequate to good score reliabilities (MA = .89, and SA = .73). There was a moderate to high correlation ( = .68) between dimensions, and boys had higher scores in both dimensions. Correlations among MCRT scores and HRF variables were similar in magnitude to previous reports in meta-analysis and systematic reviews.
PPLA-O is composed of two modules that integrate observational data collected by PE teachers into a common frame of criterion-referenced PL assessment. The HRF module uses data collected through widely validated FITescola® assessment protocols. The MCRT makes use of teacher-reported data collected in a wide range of activities and movement pursuits to measure movement competence and inherent cognitive skills ( and ). We also gathered initial evidence supporting construct validity and score reliability of the MCRT module. This highly feasible instrument can provide Portuguese grade 10-12 (15-18 years) PE students with feedback on their PL journey, along with the other instrument of PPLA (PPLA-Questionnaire). Further studies should assess inter and intra-rater reliability and criterion-related validity of its two modules.
这些研究的目的是开发葡萄牙语体育素养评估观察工具（PPLA - O），通过体育教师常规收集的数据来评估体育素养（PL）的身体和部分认知领域；并评估其一个模块[运动能力、规则和战术（MCRT）]的结构效度（维度、测量不变性以及收敛效度和区分效度）和分数可靠性。
使用葡萄牙体育教学大纲的内容分析和文献综述来确定PPLA - O的领域。多维项目反应理论（MIRT）模型用于评估结构效度和可靠性，同时对515名葡萄牙10 - 12年级学生（平均年龄 = 16岁，标准差 = 1）的样本进行双变量相关性分析。
PPLA - O的开发产生了一个包含两个模块的工具：MCRT（22项体育活动）和健康相关体能（HRF；5种方案）；两者均通过教师报告的数据输入电子表格进行评估。一个具有两个相关维度的等级反应模型（基于操作的活动[MA]和基于稳定性的活动[SA]）对MCRT数据显示出最佳拟合，表明性别间测量不变性，且分数可靠性良好（MA = 0.89，SA = 0.73）。维度之间存在中等至高相关性（r = 0.68），且男孩在两个维度上的得分都更高。MCRT分数与HRF变量之间的相关性大小与之前荟萃分析和系统评价中的报告相似。
PPLA - O由两个模块组成，将体育教师收集的观察数据整合到一个基于标准的体育素养评估通用框架中。HRF模块使用通过广泛验证的FITescola®评估方案收集的数据。MCRT利用在广泛的活动和运动追求中收集的教师报告数据来测量运动能力和内在认知技能（以及）。我们还收集了支持MCRT模块结构效度和分数可靠性的初步证据。这种高度可行的工具可以为葡萄牙10 - 12年级（15 - 18岁）的体育学生提供关于他们体育素养历程的反馈，以及PPLA的另一个工具（PPLA - 问卷）。进一步的研究应评估其两个模块的评分者间和评分者内信度以及与标准相关的效度。
