• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大学生体质健康素养问卷的有效性评价。

Validity Evaluation of the College Student Physical Literacy Questionnaire.

机构信息

East China Normal University-Xuhui Postdoctoral Workstation, Shanghai, China.

College of Physical Education, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang, China.

出版信息

Front Public Health. 2022 May 26;10:856659. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.856659. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2022.856659
PMID:35692349
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9178231/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physical literacy (PL) is an important tool to promote physical activity of individuals, and the level of physical literacy of individuals affects their physical activity behaviors. Currently, the physical fitness of college students in China is a prominent issue, and assessing physical literacy among college students may provide tools and directions to further promote physical fitness and precisely intervene in physical activity behaviors of college students in the future. This study aimed to develop a college student physical literacy questionnaire (CSPLQ) to address the lack of currently available physical literacy assessment tools for Chinese college students. We hoped to collect validity evidence of this questionnaire to measure the validity of the physical literacy self-assessment questionnaire among Chinese university students.

METHODS

An initial pool of items was obtained from existing research instruments, literature, and expert advice. An expert review panel evaluated its content. A subsequent validation process reduced the pool of items. We conducted a validation factor analysis of the CSPLQ using structural equation modeling. The relationship between physical literacy and other variables was also examined using correlation analysis.

RESULTS

The item content validity index (ICVI) of CSPLQ was 0.70-0.95. The CSPLQ was composed of a total of 38 items across 3 domains (physical and behavioral domain, affective domain, and cognitive domain) and 7 dimensions (motor skills, motor skills, physical activity, perceptions of healthy living, perceptions of physical activity, motivation to engage in physical activity, and confidence to engage in physical activity). The factor validity of the CSPLQ was determined by significant loading of all items on their expected factors, with good data model fit and good stability between two independent samples were demonstrated. Each subscale had a Cronbach α coefficient >0.9 and was strongly correlated with each other. The correlation coefficients between college students' physical literacy and other variables, including athletic ability, physical condition, physical attractiveness, physical fitness, frequency of physical activity, and length of physical activity, all reached a significance level of < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

The CSPLQ has sufficient evidence of validity. The development of the instrument showed evidence of validity for the content, response process, internal structure, and relationships with other variables.

摘要

背景

身体素养(PL)是促进个体身体活动的重要工具,个体的身体素养水平影响其身体活动行为。目前,中国大学生的体质健康是一个突出问题,评估大学生的身体素养可以为进一步促进大学生体质健康提供工具和方向,并准确干预大学生未来的身体活动行为。本研究旨在开发大学生身体素养问卷(CSPLQ),以解决目前缺乏针对中国大学生身体素养评估工具的问题。我们希望收集该问卷的有效性证据,以衡量该问卷在中国大学生身体素养自评中的有效性。

方法

从现有研究工具、文献和专家建议中获得初始项目池。一个专家审查小组对其内容进行了评估。随后的验证过程减少了项目池。我们使用结构方程模型对 CSPLQ 进行验证性因素分析。还使用相关分析研究了身体素养与其他变量之间的关系。

结果

CSPLQ 的项目内容效度指数(ICVI)为 0.70-0.95。CSPLQ 由 3 个领域(身体和行为领域、情感领域和认知领域)和 7 个维度(运动技能、运动技能、身体活动、健康生活观念、身体活动观念、参与身体活动的动机和参与身体活动的信心)组成,共 38 个项目。CSPLQ 的因子有效性由所有项目在预期因子上的显著负荷确定,两个独立样本之间具有良好的数据模型拟合和良好的稳定性。每个分量表的 Cronbach α 系数均大于 0.9,且彼此之间呈强相关。大学生身体素养与其他变量(包括运动能力、身体状况、身体吸引力、体质、身体活动频率和身体活动时长)之间的相关系数均达到显著水平(<0.05)。

结论

CSPLQ 具有充分的有效性证据。该工具的开发表明在内容、反应过程、内部结构和与其他变量的关系方面具有有效性证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8e6/9178231/945f58afbbe1/fpubh-10-856659-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8e6/9178231/7e0fd858f6df/fpubh-10-856659-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8e6/9178231/945f58afbbe1/fpubh-10-856659-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8e6/9178231/7e0fd858f6df/fpubh-10-856659-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d8e6/9178231/945f58afbbe1/fpubh-10-856659-g0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity Evaluation of the College Student Physical Literacy Questionnaire.大学生体质健康素养问卷的有效性评价。
Front Public Health. 2022 May 26;10:856659. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.856659. eCollection 2022.
2
Validity evaluation of the Health Information Preferences Questionnaire among college students.大学生健康信息偏好问卷的有效性评估。
Front Public Health. 2024 Mar 27;12:1249621. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1249621. eCollection 2024.
3
Validity evaluation of teacher's core literacy questionnaire of public physical education.公共体育教师核心素养问卷的效度评价
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 11;13:876206. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.876206. eCollection 2022.
4
Portuguese Physical Literacy Assessment Questionnaire (PPLA-Q) for adolescents (15-18 years) from grades 10-12: development, content validation and pilot testing.青少年(15-18 岁)身体素养评估问卷(PPLA-Q)葡萄牙语版(适用于 10-12 年级):编制、内容效度验证及预试验研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 29;21(1):2183. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12230-5.
5
Developing and validating a scale to measure Food and Nutrition Literacy (FNLIT) in elementary school children in Iran.开发并验证一个用于测量伊朗小学生食品与营养素养(FNLIT)的量表。
PLoS One. 2017 Jun 27;12(6):e0179196. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0179196. eCollection 2017.
6
Development and validation of the reproductive health literacy questionnaire for Chinese unmarried youth.中文未婚青年生殖健康素养问卷的编制及信效度检验
Reprod Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01278-6.
7
Physical Literacy Knowledge Questionnaire: feasibility, validity, and reliability for Canadian children aged 8 to 12 years.身体素养知识问卷:加拿大 8 至 12 岁儿童的可行性、有效性和可靠性。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 2;18(Suppl 2):1035. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5890-y.
8
Survey Development to Assess College Students' Perceptions of the Campus Environment.用于评估大学生对校园环境认知的调查开发
Am J Health Behav. 2017 Nov 1;41(6):701-709. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.41.6.4.
9
Development of a 24-hour movement behaviors questionnaire (24HMBQ) for Chinese college students: validity and reliability testing.开发适用于中国大学生的 24 小时运动行为问卷(24HMBQ):有效性和信度测试。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;23(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15393-5.
10
Development and validation of college students' tuberculosis knowledge, attitudes and practices questionnaire (CS-TBKAPQ).大学生结核病知识、态度和行为问卷(CS-TBKAPQ)的编制与验证
BMC Public Health. 2017 Dec 12;17(1):949. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4960-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Constructing and evaluating the physical literacy index for college students in China: a new insight and perspective.构建与评估中国大学生体质素养指数:一种新的见解与视角
Front Public Health. 2025 Jun 23;13:1612356. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1612356. eCollection 2025.
2
Psychometric properties of the Chinese version physical literacy assessment questionnaire among high school students in Gansu, China.中文版身体素养评估问卷在中国甘肃高中生中的心理测量学特性
PeerJ. 2025 Apr 9;13:e19093. doi: 10.7717/peerj.19093. eCollection 2025.
3
The influence of physical literacy of student with different obesity levels on physical fitness: the mediating effect of MVPA.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing factor structure of the simplified Chinese version of Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument for undergraduates in Mainland China.评估中国大陆大学生简化中文版感知身体素养量表的因子结构。
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2020 May;18(2):68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
2
Canada's Physical Literacy Consensus Statement: process and outcome.加拿大身体素养共识声明:过程与结果。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Oct 2;18(Suppl 2):1034. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5903-x.
3
Construction and Validation of a Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument for Physical Education Teachers.
不同肥胖水平学生的身体素养对体质健康的影响:中高强度体力活动的中介作用。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 4;12:1463108. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1463108. eCollection 2024.
4
Physical literacy and health of Chinese medical students: the chain mediating role of physical activity and subjective well-being.医学生身体素养与健康:身体活动和主观幸福感的链式中介作用
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 11;12:1348743. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1348743. eCollection 2024.
5
Development of the Perceived Physical Literacy Questionnaire (PPLQ) for the adult population.针对成年人群体的感知身体素养问卷(PPLQ)的编制
J Exerc Sci Fit. 2023 Oct;21(4):424-433. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2023.09.003. Epub 2023 Oct 5.
6
Translation, Cultural Adaptation and Validation of Perceived Physical Literacy Instrument-Spanish Version (PPLI-Sp) for Adults.成人感知身体素养测评工具西班牙语版的翻译、文化调适与验证。
J Sports Sci Med. 2023 Sep 1;22(3):455-464. doi: 10.52082/jssm.2023.455. eCollection 2023 Sep.
7
Physical literacy assessment in adults: A systematic review.成人身体素养评估:系统综述。
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 14;18(7):e0288541. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288541. eCollection 2023.
体育教师感知身体素养量表的构建与验证
PLoS One. 2016 May 19;11(5):e0155610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0155610. eCollection 2016.
4
Implications of Physical Literacy for Research and Practice: A Commentary.身体素养对研究与实践的启示:一篇评论
Res Q Exerc Sport. 2016;87(1):14-27. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2016.1124722.
5
Physical literacy: importance, assessment and future directions.身体素养:重要性、评估和未来方向。
Sports Med. 2014 Sep;44(9):1177-84. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0205-7.
6
Physiological and health implications of a sedentary lifestyle.久坐生活方式的生理和健康影响。
Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2010 Dec;35(6):725-40. doi: 10.1139/H10-079.
7
The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations.内容效度指数:你确定你知道所报告的内容吗?评论与建议。
Res Nurs Health. 2006 Oct;29(5):489-97. doi: 10.1002/nur.20147.
8
Analysis of verbal interactions in tutorial groups: a process study.辅导小组中的言语互动分析:一项过程研究。
Med Educ. 2006 Feb;40(2):129-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02368.x.
9
Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: theory and application.心理测量工具的效度和信度的当前概念:理论与应用
Am J Med. 2006 Feb;119(2):166.e7-16. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2005.10.036.
10
Validity: on meaningful interpretation of assessment data.效度:关于评估数据的有意义解释。
Med Educ. 2003 Sep;37(9):830-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x.