Nyman-Salonen Petra, Kykyri Virpi-Liisa, Penttonen Markku
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Department of Social Sciences and Philosophy, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 16;13:1058507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1058507. eCollection 2022.
Research on embodied aspects of clinical encounters is growing, but discussion on the premises of including embodied variables in empirical research is scarce. Studies have repeatedly demonstrated that embodied aspects of psychotherapy interaction are vital in developing a therapeutic alliance, and these should be considered to better understand the change process in psychotherapy. However, the field is still debating which methods should be used and which features of the embodied aspects are relevant in the clinical context. The field lacks methodological consistency as well as a theoretical model. In the Relational Mind research project, we have studied the embodied aspects of interaction in the context of couple therapy for almost a decade and have gained experience with the positive and negative aspects of studying embodied variables in quantitative and qualitative studies. We have set out to develop the methodology (or procedures) for studying embodied variables in a multiperson setting, concentrating on interpersonal synchrony of sympathetic nervous system responses and movements, and we have strived to create methods for integrating information from different embodied modalities. In this narrative review, we share our experiences of the challenges and added value of studying embodied aspects in psychotherapy. The research field urgently needs an ongoing discussion of what researchers should take into consideration when studying the embodied aspects of interaction. We urge researchers to collaborate between research groups to jointly decide on the basic parameters of studies on the different embodied modalities of the research so that the individual researcher can become more aware of the impact the methodological choices have on their studies, results, and interpretations. We also see the use of embodied variables as having added value in the clinical work of psychotherapists, since it not only deepens our understanding about what is helpful in psychotherapy but will enable fine-tuning therapy processes to better suit clients who are verbally less fluent.
关于临床诊疗中具身化方面的研究正在不断增加,但对于在实证研究中纳入具身化变量的前提条件的讨论却很少。研究反复表明,心理治疗互动中的具身化方面对于建立治疗联盟至关重要,为了更好地理解心理治疗中的变化过程,应该考虑这些方面。然而,该领域仍在争论应使用哪些方法,以及具身化方面的哪些特征在临床环境中是相关的。该领域缺乏方法上的一致性以及理论模型。在“关系心智”研究项目中,我们在夫妻治疗的背景下研究互动的具身化方面近十年了,并且在定量和定性研究中研究具身化变量的积极和消极方面都积累了经验。我们着手开发在多人环境中研究具身化变量的方法(或程序),专注于交感神经系统反应和动作的人际同步性,并且努力创建整合来自不同具身化模态信息的方法。在这篇叙述性综述中,我们分享在心理治疗中研究具身化方面的挑战和附加价值的经验。该研究领域迫切需要持续讨论研究互动的具身化方面时研究人员应该考虑什么。我们敦促研究团队之间开展合作,共同确定关于研究不同具身化模态的研究的基本参数,以便个体研究人员能够更加意识到方法选择对其研究、结果和解释的影响。我们还认为具身化变量在心理治疗师的临床工作中具有附加价值,因为它不仅加深了我们对心理治疗中有帮助的因素的理解,还将使治疗过程能够进行微调,以更好地适应语言表达不太流畅的客户。