• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对临床专业本科生的全国性考试的心理测量学评估。

Psychometric evaluation of a national exam for clinical undergraduates.

作者信息

Han Yuting, Jiang Zhehan, Ouyang Jinying, Xu Lingling, Cai Ting

机构信息

Institute of Medical Education, Peking University, Beijing, China.

National Center for Health Professions Education Development, Peking University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 14;9:1037897. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1037897. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2022.1037897
PMID:36590939
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9794566/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

As a high-stake national-level examination administrated before students' clerkship in China, the Standardized Competence Test for Clinical Medicine Undergraduates (SCTCMU) has received much attention from the relevant educational departments and society at large. Investigating SCTCMU's validity and reliability is critical to the national healthcare profession education.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Raw responses from SCTCMU, answered by 44,332 examines of 4th-year undergraduate medical students on 300 multiple-choice items, were used to evaluate the quality of the exam psychometric methods based on item response theory (IRT). The core assumptions and model-data fit of IRT models were evaluated, as well as the item properties and information functions.

RESULTS

The IRT models were fitted to the observed assessment data, where all the required assumptions were met. The IRT analysis showed that most items had acceptable psychometric properties, and the passing score was located close to the lowest measurement error computed from the model outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The proposed modern psychometric method provides a practical and informative approach to calibrating and analyzing medical education assessments. This work showcases a realistic depiction of the IRT analysis process and therefore facilitates the work of applied researchers wanting to conduct, interpret, and report IRT analyses on medical assessments.

摘要

背景

作为中国医学生实习前进行的一项高风险国家级考试,临床医学本科标准化能力测试(SCTCMU)受到了相关教育部门和社会各界的广泛关注。调查SCTCMU的效度和信度对国家医疗行业教育至关重要。

材料与方法

采用基于项目反应理论(IRT)的心理测量方法,利用44332名本科四年级医学生对SCTCMU的300道多项选择题的原始作答来评估考试质量。评估了IRT模型的核心假设和模型与数据的拟合度,以及项目属性和信息函数。

结果

IRT模型与观察到的评估数据拟合良好,满足所有必要假设。IRT分析表明,大多数项目具有可接受的心理测量属性,及格分数接近根据模型结果计算出的最低测量误差。

结论

所提出的现代心理测量方法为校准和分析医学教育评估提供了一种实用且信息丰富的方法。这项工作展示了IRT分析过程的实际描述,因此有助于希望对医学评估进行IRT分析、解释和报告的应用研究人员开展工作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ed/9794566/b322ff2749e0/fmed-09-1037897-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ed/9794566/4de81a88ba8e/fmed-09-1037897-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ed/9794566/b322ff2749e0/fmed-09-1037897-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ed/9794566/4de81a88ba8e/fmed-09-1037897-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d3ed/9794566/b322ff2749e0/fmed-09-1037897-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Psychometric evaluation of a national exam for clinical undergraduates.一项针对临床专业本科生的全国性考试的心理测量学评估。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 14;9:1037897. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1037897. eCollection 2022.
2
Developing Computerized Adaptive Testing for a National Health Professionals Exam: An Attempt from Psychometric Simulations.开发全国卫生专业人员考试的计算机化自适应测验:心理计量学模拟的尝试。
Perspect Med Educ. 2023 Oct 31;12(1):462-471. doi: 10.5334/pme.855. eCollection 2023.
3
Optimizing a national examination for medical undergraduates via modern automated test assembly approaches.通过现代自动化测试组装方法优化全国医学生考试。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 25;24(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05905-1.
4
Quality of multiple-choice questions in medical internship qualification examination determined by item response theory at Debre Tabor University, Ethiopia.埃塞俄比亚德布雷塔博尔大学运用项目反应理论确定医学实习资格考试多项选择题的质量。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Aug 22;22(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03687-y.
5
A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.医学教育评估中的经典测量理论和项目反应理论简介。
Med Educ. 2010 Jan;44(1):109-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03425.x.
6
Using item response theory to explore the psychometric properties of extended matching questions examination in undergraduate medical education.运用项目反应理论探索本科医学教育中扩展匹配题考试的心理测量特性。
BMC Med Educ. 2005 Mar 7;5(1):9. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-5-9.
7
State of the psychometric methods: comments on the ISOQOL SIG psychometric papers.心理测量方法的现状:对国际生活质量研究学会(ISOQOL)特别兴趣小组心理测量论文的评论
J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2019 Jul 30;3(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s41687-019-0134-1.
8
Psychometric evaluation of an Italian custom 4-item short form of the PROMIS anxiety item bank in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: an item response theory analysis.免疫介导的炎症性疾病中意大利定制的4项PROMIS焦虑项目库简表的心理测量学评估:项目反应理论分析
PeerJ. 2021 Oct 27;9:e12100. doi: 10.7717/peerj.12100. eCollection 2021.
9
Comparing five depression measures in depressed Chinese patients using item response theory: an examination of item properties, measurement precision and score comparability.运用项目反应理论比较中国抑郁症患者的五种抑郁量表:项目特性、测量精度及分数可比性检验
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Apr 4;15(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0631-y.
10
Item response theory in high-stakes pharmacy assessments.项目反应理论在高风险药学评估中的应用。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2022 Sep;14(9):1206-1214. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2022.07.023. Epub 2022 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and applications of graduate outcome-based curriculum for basic medical education.基于研究生成果的基础医学教育课程的开发与应用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Aug 16;11:1400811. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1400811. eCollection 2024.
2
Optimizing a national examination for medical undergraduates via modern automated test assembly approaches.通过现代自动化测试组装方法优化全国医学生考试。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 Aug 25;24(1):919. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05905-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Improving the Measurement of Functional Somatic Symptoms With Item Response Theory.运用项目反应理论提高功能性躯体症状的测量水平。
Assessment. 2021 Dec;28(8):1960-1970. doi: 10.1177/1073191120947153. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
2
Validation and perception of a key feature problem examination in neurology.神经病学关键特征问题检查的验证和感知。
PLoS One. 2019 Oct 18;14(10):e0224131. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224131. eCollection 2019.
3
Development and Validation of an Item Bank for Depression Screening in the Chinese Population Using Computer Adaptive Testing: A Simulation Study.
使用计算机自适应测试开发和验证用于中国人群抑郁症筛查的题库:一项模拟研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 18;9:1225. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01225. eCollection 2018.
4
Investigating the Behaviors of and RMSEA in Fitting a Unidimensional Model to Multidimensional Data.研究在将单维模型拟合到多维数据时[具体指标]和近似误差均方根(RMSEA)的行为。 (注:原文中“the Behaviors of and”这里“of”后面应该有具体指标未给出完整)
Appl Psychol Meas. 2017 Nov;41(8):632-644. doi: 10.1177/0146621617710464. Epub 2017 May 30.
5
Development of a Computer Adaptive Test for Depression Based on the Dutch-Flemish Version of the PROMIS Item Bank.基于荷兰-弗拉芒语版患者报告结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)题库开发抑郁症计算机自适应测试。
Eval Health Prof. 2017 Mar;40(1):79-105. doi: 10.1177/0163278716684168. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
6
An investigation of emotional intelligence measures using item response theory.运用项目反应理论对情商测量方法的一项调查。
Psychol Assess. 2015 Dec;27(4):1241-52. doi: 10.1037/pas0000132. Epub 2015 May 11.
7
The value of item response theory in clinical assessment: a review.项目反应理论在临床评估中的价值:综述。
Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):291-307. doi: 10.1177/1073191110374797. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
8
Item response theory modeling in health outcomes measurement.健康结果测量中的项目反应理论建模。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2003 Apr;3(2):131-45. doi: 10.1586/14737167.3.2.131.
9
Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS).健康相关生活质量题库的心理测量评估与校准:患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)计划
Med Care. 2007 May;45(5 Suppl 1):S22-31. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04.
10
Progress testing with short answer questions.使用简答题进行进展测试。
Med Teach. 2005 Nov;27(7):578-82. doi: 10.1080/01421590500062749.