• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用项目反应理论提高功能性躯体症状的测量水平。

Improving the Measurement of Functional Somatic Symptoms With Item Response Theory.

机构信息

University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Interdisciplinary Center Psychopathology and Emotion regulation (ICPE), Groningen, the Netherlands.

University of Groningen, Department of Psychometrics and Statistics, Groningen, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Assessment. 2021 Dec;28(8):1960-1970. doi: 10.1177/1073191120947153. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

DOI:10.1177/1073191120947153
PMID:32757771
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8543564/
Abstract

More than 40 questionnaires have been developed to assess functional somatic symptoms (FSS), but there are several methodological issues regarding the measurement of FSS. We aimed to identify which items of the somatization subscale of the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90) are more informative and discriminative between persons at different levels of severity of FSS. To this end, item response theory was applied to the somatization scale of the SCL-90, collected from a sample of 82,740 adult participants without somatic conditions in the Lifelines Cohort Study. Sensitivity analyses were performed with all the participants who completed the somatization scale. Both analyses showed that Items 11 "feeling weak physically" and 12 "heavy feelings in arms or legs" were the most discriminative and informative to measure severity levels of FSS, regardless of somatic conditions. Clinicians and researchers may pay extra attention to these symptoms to augment the assessment of FSS.

摘要

已经开发了 40 多种问卷来评估功能性躯体症状(FSS),但在 FSS 的测量方面存在一些方法学问题。我们旨在确定症状清单-90(SCL-90)躯体化分量表中的哪些项目在 FSS 严重程度不同的人群之间更具信息性和区分性。为此,我们应用项目反应理论对来自 Lifelines 队列研究中无躯体疾病的 82740 名成年参与者的 SCL-90 躯体化量表进行了分析。使用所有完成躯体化量表的参与者进行了敏感性分析。这两种分析都表明,项目 11“身体虚弱”和项目 12“手臂或腿部沉重感”在测量 FSS 的严重程度方面最具区分性和信息量,无论是否存在躯体症状。临床医生和研究人员可能会特别注意这些症状,以增强对 FSS 的评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08eb/8543564/35d94af58ea7/10.1177_1073191120947153-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08eb/8543564/d084ef21cf88/10.1177_1073191120947153-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08eb/8543564/411dba6e096a/10.1177_1073191120947153-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08eb/8543564/137c3e63f139/10.1177_1073191120947153-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08eb/8543564/35d94af58ea7/10.1177_1073191120947153-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08eb/8543564/d084ef21cf88/10.1177_1073191120947153-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08eb/8543564/411dba6e096a/10.1177_1073191120947153-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08eb/8543564/137c3e63f139/10.1177_1073191120947153-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/08eb/8543564/35d94af58ea7/10.1177_1073191120947153-fig4.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving the Measurement of Functional Somatic Symptoms With Item Response Theory.运用项目反应理论提高功能性躯体症状的测量水平。
Assessment. 2021 Dec;28(8):1960-1970. doi: 10.1177/1073191120947153. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
2
Assessment of Somatization and Medically Unexplained Symptoms in Later Life.评估晚年的躯体化和医学无法解释的症状。
Assessment. 2018 Apr;25(3):374-393. doi: 10.1177/1073191117721740. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
3
Does Functional Somatic Symptoms Measurement Differ Across Sex and Age? Differential Item Functioning in Somatic Symptoms Measured With the CIDI.功能性躯体症状的测量是否存在性别和年龄差异?用 CIDI 测量的躯体症状的差异项目功能。
Assessment. 2022 Oct;29(7):1392-1405. doi: 10.1177/10731911211017228. Epub 2021 May 27.
4
Predictors of a functional somatic syndrome diagnosis in patients with persistent functional somatic symptoms.持续性躯体症状患者功能性躯体综合征诊断的预测因素。
Int J Behav Med. 2013 Jun;20(2):206-12. doi: 10.1007/s12529-012-9251-4.
5
Somatic Symptom Disorder, Medically Unexplained Symptoms, Somatoform Disorders, Functional Neurological Disorder: How 5 Got It Wrong.躯体症状障碍、医学上无法解释的症状、躯体形式障碍、功能性神经障碍:五点错误解读
Can J Psychiatry. 2020 May;65(5):301-305. doi: 10.1177/0706743720912858. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
6
Functional somatic symptoms in 5-7 year old children: assessment, prevalence and co-occurrence.5至7岁儿童的功能性躯体症状:评估、患病率及共现情况
Dan Med J. 2012 Nov;59(11):B4537.
7
Research on Somatization and Somatic Symptom Disorders: Ars longa, vita brevis.躯体化障碍和躯体症状障碍研究:路漫漫其修远兮,吾将上下而求索。
Psychosom Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;79(9):971-973. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000533.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the percentage of revised diagnoses in functional somatic symptoms.功能性躯体症状中修订诊断百分比的系统评价与荟萃分析
J Psychosom Res. 2016 Sep;88:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 25.
9
The Predictors of Somatic Symptoms in a Population Sample: The Lifelines Cohort Study.人群样本中躯体症状的预测因素:生命历程队列研究。
Psychosom Med. 2022;84(9):1056-1066. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001101. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
10
Prevalence and association of somatic symptoms in patients with Major Depressive Disorder.重度抑郁症患者躯体症状的患病率及相关性
J Affect Disord. 2008 Oct;110(3):270-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2008.01.009. Epub 2008 Feb 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing a Measure for the Accuracy of Symptom Perception: The Congruence Between Self-reported Dyspnea and Physiological Parameters in the Dutch Lifelines Cohort Study.开发一种症状感知准确性的测量方法:荷兰生命线队列研究中自我报告的呼吸困难与生理参数之间的一致性
Biopsychosoc Sci Med. 2025 May 1;87(4):249-258. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000001382. Epub 2025 Mar 10.
2
Using Item Response Theory to Develop a Shortened Version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire for Children.运用项目反应理论编制儿童版宾夕法尼亚州立大学忧虑问卷简版。
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Oct 21. doi: 10.1007/s10578-024-01774-3.
3
Exploration of the relationship between general health-related problems and subclinical coronary artery disease: a cross-sectional study in a general population.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Somatization and Medically Unexplained Symptoms in Later Life.评估晚年的躯体化和医学无法解释的症状。
Assessment. 2018 Apr;25(3):374-393. doi: 10.1177/1073191117721740. Epub 2017 Jul 26.
2
Core Outcome Domains for Clinical Trials on Somatic Symptom Disorder, Bodily Distress Disorder, and Functional Somatic Syndromes: European Network on Somatic Symptom Disorders Recommendations.躯体症状障碍、躯体形式障碍和功能性躯体综合征临床试验的核心结局领域:躯体症状障碍欧洲网络的建议。
Psychosom Med. 2017 Nov/Dec;79(9):1008-1015. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000502.
3
Cohort Profile: LifeLines, a three-generation cohort study and biobank.
探讨一般健康相关问题与亚临床冠状动脉疾病之间的关系:一项普通人群的横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 14;14(10):e079835. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079835.
4
Psychometric evaluation of a national exam for clinical undergraduates.一项针对临床专业本科生的全国性考试的心理测量学评估。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 14;9:1037897. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1037897. eCollection 2022.
5
Development of the short Creative Expression Interest Scale based on item response theory.基于项目反应理论的简短创造性表达兴趣量表的编制。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 22;13:955176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.955176. eCollection 2022.
6
Persistence of somatic symptoms after COVID-19 in the Netherlands: an observational cohort study.荷兰 COVID-19 后躯体症状的持续存在:一项观察性队列研究。
Lancet. 2022 Aug 6;400(10350):452-461. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01214-4.
7
Persistent SOMAtic symptoms ACROSS diseases - from risk factors to modification: scientific framework and overarching protocol of the interdisciplinary SOMACROSS research unit (RU 5211).持续性躯体症状跨疾病谱 - 从危险因素到干预:跨学科 SOMACROSS 研究单位(RU 5211)的科学框架和总体方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 21;12(1):e057596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057596.
队列简介:生命线,一项三代队列研究及生物样本库。
Int J Epidemiol. 2015 Aug;44(4):1172-80. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu229. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
4
Patients with unexplained physical symptoms have poorer quality of life and higher costs than other patient groups: a cross-sectional study on burden.不明原因躯体症状患者的生命质量和医疗费用均较其他患者群体差:一项关于负担的横断面研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec 17;13:520. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-520.
5
[59 important health problems; a selection of diseases for public health monitoring].[59个重要的健康问题;公共卫生监测疾病选介]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2013;157(31):A5994.
6
How to assess common somatic symptoms in large-scale studies: a systematic review of questionnaires.如何在大规模研究中评估常见躯体症状:问卷的系统评价。
J Psychosom Res. 2013 Jun;74(6):459-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2013.03.093. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
7
A study of the dimensionality and measurement precision of the SCL-90-R using item response theory.使用项目反应理论研究 SCL-90-R 的维度和测量精度。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2011 Sep;20(3):e39-55. doi: 10.1002/mpr.347. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
8
Single-item screens identified patients with elevated levels of depressive and somatization symptoms in outpatient physical therapy.单项症状筛查可发现门诊物理治疗患者中存在抑郁和躯体化症状升高的情况。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Mar;21(2):257-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-9948-x. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
9
Bifactor models and rotations: exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores.双因子模型和旋转:探索多维数据产生单一尺度分数的程度。
J Pers Assess. 2010 Nov;92(6):544-59. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.496477.
10
Item response theory and clinical measurement.项目反应理论与临床测量。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2009;5:27-48. doi: 10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153553.