• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在包括结合特异性抗体和替代病毒中和试验(sVNT)在内的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学免疫分析中,内部和商业检测之间的诊断性能比较。

Diagnostic performance between in-house and commercial SARS-CoV-2 serological immunoassays including binding-specific antibody and surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT).

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

Research Institute for Health Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 2;13(1):34. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26202-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-26202-1
PMID:36593231
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9806819/
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between in-house and commercial binding-specific IgG antibodies and between in-house and commercial SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization tests (sVNT). Samples from healthcare workers who received vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 were tested for RBD-specific antibody, S-specific antibody, and in-house ELISA, commercial sVNT, and in-house sVNT, against wild-type SARS-CoV-2. Three hundred and five samples were included in the analysis. The correlation between S-specific binding antibodies and in-house ELISA was 0.96 (95% CI 0.96-0.97) and between RBD-specific antibodies and in-house ELISA was 0.96 (95% CI 0.95-0.97). The Cohen's kappa between in-house sVNT and the commercial test was 0.90 (95% CI 0.80, 1.00). If using 90% inhibition of sVNT as the reference standard, the optimal cut-off value of RBD-specific antibodies was 442.7 BAU/mL, the kappa, sensitivity, and specificity being 0.99, 99%, and 100%, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of S-specific antibodies was 1155.9 BAU/mL, the kappa, sensitivity, and specificity being 0.99, 100%, and 99%, respectively. This study demonstrated a very strong correlation between in-house ELISA and 2 commercial assays. There was also a very strong correlation between in-house and commercial SARS-CoV-2 sVNT, a finding of particular interest which will inform future research.

摘要

本研究旨在评估内部和商业结合特异性 IgG 抗体之间以及内部和商业 SARS-CoV-2 替代病毒中和试验(sVNT)之间的相关性。对接受 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的医护人员的样本进行 RBD 特异性抗体、S 特异性抗体和内部 ELISA、商业 sVNT 以及针对野生型 SARS-CoV-2 的内部 sVNT 检测。共纳入 305 份样本进行分析。S 特异性结合抗体与内部 ELISA 的相关性为 0.96(95%CI 0.96-0.97),RBD 特异性抗体与内部 ELISA 的相关性为 0.96(95%CI 0.95-0.97)。内部 sVNT 和商业检测之间的 Cohen's kappa 值为 0.90(95%CI 0.80, 1.00)。如果以 90%抑制 sVNT 作为参考标准,RBD 特异性抗体的最佳截断值为 442.7 BAU/mL,kappa 值、灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.99、99%和 100%。S 特异性抗体的最佳截断值为 1155.9 BAU/mL,kappa 值、灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.99、100%和 99%。本研究表明内部 ELISA 与 2 种商业检测之间具有很强的相关性。内部和商业 SARS-CoV-2 sVNT 之间也存在很强的相关性,这一发现具有特别的意义,将为未来的研究提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67b2/9807595/a8e585e84282/41598_2022_26202_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67b2/9807595/52a3e2985cec/41598_2022_26202_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67b2/9807595/a8e585e84282/41598_2022_26202_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67b2/9807595/52a3e2985cec/41598_2022_26202_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/67b2/9807595/a8e585e84282/41598_2022_26202_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Diagnostic performance between in-house and commercial SARS-CoV-2 serological immunoassays including binding-specific antibody and surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT).在包括结合特异性抗体和替代病毒中和试验(sVNT)在内的 SARS-CoV-2 血清学免疫分析中,内部和商业检测之间的诊断性能比较。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 2;13(1):34. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-26202-1.
2
Kinetics and ability of binding antibody and surrogate virus neutralization tests to predict neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant following BNT162b2 booster administration.抗体结合动力学和替代病毒中和试验的能力,以预测接种 BNT162b2 加强针后对 SARS-CoV-2 奥密克戎变异株的中和抗体。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2023 Apr 21;61(10):1875-1885. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2022-1258. Print 2023 Sep 26.
3
Evaluation of the correlation between the access SARS-CoV-2 IgM and IgG II antibody tests with the SARS-CoV-2 surrogate virus neutralization test.评估 SARS-CoV-2 IgM 和 IgG II 抗体检测与 SARS-CoV-2 替代病毒中和试验之间的相关性。
J Med Virol. 2022 Jan;94(1):335-341. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27338. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
4
Evaluation of a biotin-based surrogate virus neutralization test for detecting postvaccination antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants in sera.基于生物素的替代病毒中和试验评估血清中针对 SARS-CoV-2 变异体的疫苗接种后抗体。
Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2023 Feb 26;646:8-18. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.01.052. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
5
Can commercial automated immunoassays be utilized to predict neutralizing antibodies after SARS-CoV-2 infection? A comparative study between three different assays.商业自动化免疫分析可否用于预测 SARS-CoV-2 感染后的中和抗体?三种不同检测方法的比较研究。
Front Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2021 Jul 30;26(7):198-206. doi: 10.52586/4934.
6
Evaluation of residual humoral immune response against SARS-CoV-2 by a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT) 9 months after BNT162b2 primary vaccination.评估 BNT162b2 初级接种后 9 个月对 SARS-CoV-2 的剩余体液免疫应答的替代病毒中和试验(sVNT)。
J Infect Chemother. 2023 Jun;29(6):624-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.03.002. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
7
Evaluation of commercially available fully automated and ELISA-based assays for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies.评估市售的全自动和基于 ELISA 的检测抗 SARS-CoV-2 中和抗体的方法。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 8;12(1):19020. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21317-x.
8
Comparison of diagnostic performances of different serological tests for SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection in cats and dogs.比较不同血清学检测方法在猫和狗中 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测的诊断性能。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2022 Nov;69(6):3530-3539. doi: 10.1111/tbed.14716. Epub 2022 Oct 13.
9
The Protection Level of S-RBD SARS-CoV-2 Immunoglobulin G Antibodies Using the Chemiluminescent Immunoassay Compared to the Surrogate Virus Neutralization Test Method.与替代病毒中和试验方法相比,采用化学发光免疫分析法检测SARS-CoV-2免疫球蛋白G抗体的保护水平。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Aug 14;14(16):1776. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14161776.
10
Estimating the Neutralizing Effect and Titer Correlation of Semi-Quantitative Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Immunoassays.估算半定量抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体免疫分析的中和效果和滴度相关性。
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022 Apr 14;12:822599. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.822599. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Nanoparticle-supported, rapid, digital quantification of neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 variants.纳米颗粒支持的针对新冠病毒变异株的中和抗体快速数字定量分析
Biosens Bioelectron. 2025 Oct 1;285:117549. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2025.117549. Epub 2025 May 7.
2
TIRTL-seq: Deep, quantitative, and affordable paired TCR repertoire sequencing.TIRTL-seq:深度、定量且经济实惠的配对TCR库测序
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 31:2024.09.16.613345. doi: 10.1101/2024.09.16.613345.
3
The Anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-Protein IgG, Which Is Detected Using the Chemiluminescence Microparticle Immunoassay (CMIA) in Individuals Having Either a History of COVID-19 Vaccination and/or SARS-CoV-2 Infection, Showed a High-Titer Neutralizing Effect.

本文引用的文献

1
SARS-CoV-2 vaccine effectiveness against infection, symptomatic and severe COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.SARS-CoV-2 疫苗对感染、有症状和重症 COVID-19 的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2022 May 7;22(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07418-y.
2
The Comparability of Anti-Spike SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Tests is Time-Dependent: a Prospective Observational Study.抗刺突 SARS-CoV-2 抗体检测的可比性随时间变化:一项前瞻性观察研究。
Microbiol Spectr. 2022 Feb 23;10(1):e0140221. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.01402-21.
3
Antibody responses and correlates of protection in the general population after two doses of the ChAdOx1 or BNT162b2 vaccines.
用化学发光微粒子免疫分析(CMIA)检测到的针对 SARS-CoV-2 刺突蛋白 IgG 的抗体,在有 COVID-19 疫苗接种史和/或 SARS-CoV-2 感染史的个体中,显示出高滴度的中和作用。
Viruses. 2024 Sep 3;16(9):1409. doi: 10.3390/v16091409.
4
Robust immune response to COVID-19 vaccination in the island population of Greenland.格陵兰岛岛民对新冠疫苗接种的强劲免疫反应。
Commun Med (Lond). 2024 Sep 6;4(1):173. doi: 10.1038/s43856-024-00602-y.
5
Safety and immunogenicity of CoronaVac and ChAdOx1 heterologous prime-boost vaccines in an overweight population in Chiang Mai, Thailand.科兴新冠疫苗(CoronaVac)和牛津-阿斯利康腺病毒载体疫苗(ChAdOx1)异源初免-加强疫苗在泰国清迈超重人群中的安全性和免疫原性。
Vaccine X. 2024 Mar 16;18:100475. doi: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100475. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Safety and immunogenicity of the third and fourth doses of vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 following a 2-dose regimen of inactivated whole-virion SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.接种 2 剂灭活全病毒 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗后接种第 3 剂和第 4 剂 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗的安全性和免疫原性。
Sci Rep. 2023 Nov 13;13(1):19736. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45735-7.
7
A preliminary study on the effectiveness of maternal to neonatal transfer of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in the women vaccinated with heterologous CoronaVac-ChAdOx1.关于接种异源科兴疫苗(克尔来福-腺病毒载体)的女性中抗 SARS-CoV-2 抗体向新生儿转移有效性的初步研究。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023 Dec 31;19(1):2196912. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2196912. Epub 2023 Apr 14.
在接种两剂 ChAdOx1 或 BNT162b2 疫苗后,普通人群中的抗体反应和保护相关因素。
Nat Med. 2022 May;28(5):1072-1082. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01721-6. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
4
Humoral immune response after different SARS-CoV-2 vaccination regimens.不同 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种方案后的体液免疫应答。
BMC Med. 2022 Jan 21;20(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s12916-021-02231-x.
5
Evaluation of Humoral Immune Response after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Using Two Binding Antibody Assays and a Neutralizing Antibody Assay.评价两种结合抗体检测试剂盒和中和抗体检测试剂盒在评估 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种后的体液免疫应答中的应用。
Microbiol Spectr. 2021 Dec 22;9(3):e0120221. doi: 10.1128/Spectrum.01202-21. Epub 2021 Nov 24.
6
Comparing the clinical efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较 COVID-19 疫苗的临床疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2021 Nov 23;11(1):22777. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02321-z.
7
Neutralising antibody titres as predictors of protection against SARS-CoV-2 variants and the impact of boosting: a meta-analysis.中和抗体滴度作为预测对 SARS-CoV-2 变异体的保护作用以及加强免疫的影响的指标:一项荟萃分析。
Lancet Microbe. 2022 Jan;3(1):e52-e61. doi: 10.1016/S2666-5247(21)00267-6. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
8
The WHO International Standard for COVID-19 serological tests: towards harmonization of anti-spike assays.世卫组织 COVID-19 血清学检测国际标准:推动棘突蛋白检测分析方法的标准化。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2021 Nov;100:108095. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2021.108095. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
9
Correlates of protection against symptomatic and asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection.针对有症状和无症状 SARS-CoV-2 感染的保护相关因素。
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2032-2040. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01540-1. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
10
Performance evaluation of three automated quantitative immunoassays and their correlation with a surrogate virus neutralization test in coronavirus disease 19 patients and pre-pandemic controls.三种自动化定量免疫分析方法的性能评估及其与新型冠状病毒病患者和大流行前对照者替代病毒中和试验的相关性。
J Clin Lab Anal. 2021 Sep;35(9):e23921. doi: 10.1002/jcla.23921. Epub 2021 Aug 8.