Lin Guo-Hao, Tran Christine, Brzyska Karolina, Kan Joseph Y, Wang Hom-Lay, Curtis Donald A, Kao Richard T
Division of Periodontology, Department of Orofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, California, USA.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Apr;25(2):321-329. doi: 10.1111/cid.13176. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the influence of vertical platform discrepancies for splinted and non-splinted adjacent implants on radiographic marginal bone loss (RMBL).
Data from January 2000 to February 2021 were collected from the electronic charts of 156 patients with 337 implants at the UCSF School of Dentistry. Five different implant restoration categories were evaluated for radiographic evidence of proximal RMBL. Patients with (1) two adjacent single crowns, (2) two adjacent splinted crowns, (3) three-unit bridges supported by two implants, (4) three adjacent single crowns, and (5) three adjacent splinted crowns. Inclusion required baseline radiograph taken at the time of prosthesis delivery or final impression, and follow-up radiographs at least 12 months after restorations have been in function. Measurements assessed included vertical distance between adjacent implant platforms and proximal RMBL around implants. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of implants with ≥1 mm RMBL between different type of restorations were calculated.
In general, prostheses supported by splinted adjacent implants demonstrated a significant association with the presence of ≥1 mm RMBL (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.17-5.17, p = 0.018) when compared to prostheses supported by non-splinted adjacent implants. In addition, prostheses with a vertical platform discrepancy ≥0.5 mm demonstrated a significant association with the presence of ≥1 mm RMBL (OR = 4.30, 95% CI = 1.85 to 10.01, p = 0.007) when compared to prostheses with a vertical platform discrepancy <0.5 mm. When adjacent implants had ≥0.5 mm vertical platform discrepancy, the majority (66.67%) of three splinted adjacent crowns had at least one implant with ≥1 mm RMBL. This was followed by two splinted adjacent crowns (58.97%), three-unit bridge (25.93%), two single adjacent crowns (24.24%), and three single adjacent crowns (18.18%). When adjacent implants had ≥1 mm vertical platform discrepancy, there was an increased percentage of implants with ≥1 mm RMBL. The restorative design associated with the highest percent of implants with bone loss was three splinted adjacent crowns (70%), two splinted adjacent crowns (61.11%), three single adjacent crowns (40%), and three-unit bridge and two single adjacent implants (21.05%). Three splinted adjacent crowns were significantly associated with ≥1 mm RMBL when compared to three-unit bridge (OR 6.56, 95% CI 1.59-27.07). Similarly, two splinted crowns were significantly associated with ≥1 mm RMBL when compared to two single crowns (OR = 2.50, 95% CI = 1.08-5.79).
Two or three adjacent implants placed with a vertical platform discrepancy, when splinted together, are associated with higherincidence of ≥1 mm RMBL than non-splinted restorations.
本回顾性研究旨在调查夹板式和非夹板式相邻种植体的垂直平台差异对影像学边缘骨吸收(RMBL)的影响。
收集2000年1月至2021年2月期间在加州大学旧金山分校牙科学院156例患者337颗种植体的电子病历数据。评估了五种不同的种植修复类别近端RMBL的影像学证据。患者包括(1)两个相邻的单冠,(2)两个相邻的夹板式冠,(3)由两颗种植体支持的三单位桥体,(4)三个相邻单冠,以及(5)三个相邻的夹板式冠。纳入标准要求在义齿交付或最终印模时拍摄基线X光片,以及修复体功能至少12个月后的随访X光片。评估的测量指标包括相邻种植体平台之间的垂直距离以及种植体周围的近端RMBL。计算不同类型修复体中RMBL≥1mm的种植体的比值比(OR)和95%置信区间(95%CI)。
总体而言,与非夹板式相邻种植体支持的修复体相比,夹板式相邻种植体支持的修复体与RMBL≥1mm的存在显著相关(OR = 2.55,95%CI = 1.17 - 5.17,p = 0.018)。此外,与垂直平台差异<0.5mm的修复体相比,垂直平台差异≥0.5mm的修复体与RMBL≥1mm的存在显著相关(OR = 4.30,95%CI = 1.85至10.01,p = 0.007)。当相邻种植体的垂直平台差异≥0.5mm时,大多数(66.67%)三个相邻夹板式冠的种植体中至少有一个种植体的RMBL≥1mm。其次是两个相邻夹板式冠(58.97%)、三单位桥体(25.93%)、两个相邻单冠(24.24%)和三个相邻单冠(18.18%)。当相邻种植体的垂直平台差异≥1mm时,RMBL≥1mm的种植体百分比增加。与骨吸收种植体百分比最高相关的修复设计是三个相邻夹板式冠(70%)、两个相邻夹板式冠(61.11%)、三个相邻单冠(40%)以及三单位桥体和两个相邻单种植体(21.05%)。与三单位桥体相比,三个相邻夹板式冠与RMBL≥1mm显著相关(OR 6.56,95%CI 1.59 - 27.07)。同样,与两个单冠相比,两个夹板式冠与RMBL≥1mm显著相关(OR = 2.50,95%CI = 1.08 - 5.79)。
两个或三个垂直平台存在差异的相邻种植体,当用夹板固定在一起时,与非夹板式修复体相比,RMBL≥1mm的发生率更高。