Mendonça Jose Alfredo, Francischone Carlos Eduardo, Senna Plinio Mendes, Matos de Oliveira Ana Elisa, Sotto-Maior Bruno Salles
Department of Implantology, São Leopoldo Mandic Institute and Research Center, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
J Periodontol. 2014 Jun;85(6):787-94. doi: 10.1902/jop.2013.130193. Epub 2013 Oct 30.
The aim of the present study is to evaluate the survival rate and bone loss around short implants (≤10 mm) supporting splinted or non-splinted posterior prostheses during a follow-up period of 3 to 16 years.
A total of 453 implants from 198 patients was divided into splinted or non-splinted groups. Implant survival rate was calculated for each group, and potential risk was represented as odds ratio (OR). The final linear distance from implant platform level to the first bone-to-implant contact was compared to this same reference just after loading by digital periapical radiographs to determine the marginal bone loss (BL).
The splinted group comprised 219 implants in 86 patients, whereas the non-splinted group included 234 implants from 112 patients. The mean follow-up period was 9.7 ± 3.7 years. Although different success rates were found for splinted (97.7%) and non-splinted (93.2%) groups, they exhibited similar BL (1.22 ± 0.95 mm and 1.27 ± 1.15 mm, respectively). The success of splinted implants was associated with no other variable, whereas non-splinted implants exhibited higher risk of failure when placed in men (OR = 3.2) and when implants shorter than 10 mm were used (OR = 3.6 and 4.1 for 8.5 mm and 7 mm, respectively). Regardless of group, 71.4% of the unsuccessful implants failed before the end of the first year after loading.
Non-splinted posterior short implants had a somewhat lower success rate than splinted short implants, and the failure rate in non-splinted short implants appeared to be greater in males as well as in implants ≤10 mm.
本研究的目的是评估在3至16年的随访期内,支持夹板式或非夹板式后牙修复体的短种植体(≤10毫米)周围的存活率和骨丢失情况。
将198例患者的453枚种植体分为夹板式或非夹板式组。计算每组的种植体存活率,并将潜在风险表示为比值比(OR)。通过数字化根尖片比较种植体平台水平至首次骨与种植体接触的最终线性距离与加载后即刻的相同参考值,以确定边缘骨丢失(BL)。
夹板式组包括86例患者的219枚种植体,而非夹板式组包括112例患者的234枚种植体。平均随访期为9.7±3.7年。尽管夹板式组(97.7%)和非夹板式组(93.2%)的成功率不同,但它们的边缘骨丢失情况相似(分别为1.22±0.95毫米和1.27±1.15毫米)。夹板式种植体的成功与其他变量无关,而非夹板式种植体在男性患者中植入时(OR=3.2)以及使用长度小于10毫米的种植体时(8.5毫米和7毫米的种植体OR分别为3.6和4.1)失败风险更高。无论分组如何,71.4%的失败种植体在加载后第一年末之前就失败了。
非夹板式后牙短种植体的成功率略低于夹板式短种植体,并且非夹板式短种植体在男性以及长度≤10毫米的种植体中的失败率似乎更高。