Pediatric Brain Death Testing Over Parental Objections: Not an Ethically Preferable Option.
作者信息
Marron Jonathan M
机构信息
Dana-Farber/Boston Children's Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Harvard Medical School.
Center for Bioethics, Harvard Medical School.
出版信息
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jan;23(1):90-93. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2146792.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Pediatric Brain Death Testing Over Parental Objections: Not an Ethically Preferable Option.不顾父母反对进行儿科脑死亡检测：并非伦理上更可取的选择。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jan;23(1):90-93. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2146792.
2
Responding to Parental Objections Over Testing for Death by Neurologic Criteria.回应家长对基于神经学标准判定死亡检测的异议。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jan;23(1):94-95. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2146791.
3
Disputes over Diagnosing Death: Is It Ethical to Test for Death by Neurologic Criteria over Parental Objection?关于死亡诊断的争议：在父母反对的情况下依据神经学标准进行死亡检测是否合乎伦理？
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Jan;23(1):86-87. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2023.2146408.
4
Religious objections to brain death.对脑死亡的宗教异议。
J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):875-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.06.017. Epub 2014 Jun 29.
5
Changing interpretations of death by neurologic criteria: the McMath case.根据神经学标准对死亡定义的不断变化：麦克马思案例
J Crit Care. 2014 Oct;29(5):870-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.06.020. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
6
Rethinking Brain Death as a Legal Fiction: Is the Terminology the Problem?重新思考脑死亡作为法律拟制：问题出在术语上吗？
Hastings Cent Rep. 2018 Nov;48 Suppl 4:S49-S52. doi: 10.1002/hast.955.
7
In re Long Island Jewish Medical Center.关于长岛犹太医疗中心案
Wests N Y Suppl. 1996 Feb 28;641:989-92.
8
[The definition of death and organ retrieval: a persisting philosophical controversy].[死亡的定义与器官获取：一场持续的哲学争论]
Rev Med Brux. 2014 Mar-Apr;35(2):103-11.
9
The Case for Reasonable Accommodation of Conscientious Objections to Declarations of Brain Death.合理顾及对脑死亡宣告的良心反对的理由
J Bioeth Inq. 2016 Mar;13(1):105-15. doi: 10.1007/s11673-015-9683-z. Epub 2016 Jan 5.
10
The outpatient management of a brain dead child.脑死亡儿童的门诊管理。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Summer;2(3):359-60; discussion 361-70.
引用本文的文献
1
Themes in the Management of Pediatric Brain Death Contestation: Exploratory Qualitative Work From Multidisciplinary Health Professionals in the United States.儿科脑死亡争议管理中的主题：来自美国多学科健康专业人员的探索性定性研究
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun 1;26(6):e846-e854. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003744. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
本文引用的文献
1
Pediatric Intensivist and Pediatric Neurologist Perspectives and Practices on Death by Neurologic Criteria.儿科重症监护医生和儿科神经科医生对神经学标准死亡的观点和实践。
J Clin Ethics. 2021 Fall;32(3):195-205.
2
Determination of Brain Death/Death by Neurologic Criteria: The World Brain Death Project.脑死亡/神经标准判定死亡：世界脑死亡项目。
JAMA. 2020 Sep 15;324(11):1078-1097. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.11586.
3
Brain death, the determination of brain death, and member guidance for brain death accommodation requests: AAN position statement.脑死亡、脑死亡的判定以及脑死亡收容请求的成员指南：美国神经病学学会立场声明
Neurology. 2019 Jan 28;92(5):228-232. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006750.
4
Is There Ever a Role for the Unilateral Do Not Attempt Resuscitation Order in Pediatric Care?在儿科护理中，是否存在使用单侧不复苏医嘱的情况？
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jan;55(1):164-171. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
5
COUNTERPOINT: Should Informed Consent Be Required for Apnea Testing in Patients With Suspected Brain Death? Yes.反驳观点：对于疑似脑死亡患者的呼吸暂停测试，是否应该要求获得知情同意？应该。
Chest. 2017 Oct;152(4):702-704. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2017.05.032. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
6
Informed Consent in Decision-Making in Pediatric Practice.知情同意在儿科实践中的决策制定。
Pediatrics. 2016 Aug;138(2). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-1485.
7
Clinical report—Guidelines for the determination of brain death in infants and children: an update of the 1987 task force recommendations.临床报告——婴儿和儿童脑死亡判定指南：1987 年工作组建议的更新。
Pediatrics. 2011 Sep;128(3):e720-40. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1511. Epub 2011 Aug 28.
Zotero 插件