Department of Surgery, Tung Wah Hospital, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
Department of Surgery, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, 2/F, Professorial Block, Queen Mary Hospital, 102 Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
BMC Med Educ. 2023 Jan 5;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03958-8.
The global pandemic of COVID-19 has led to extensive practice of online learning. Our main objective is to compare different online synchronous interactive learning activities to evaluate students' perceptions. Moreover, we also aim to identify factors influencing their perceptions in these classes.
A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study focusing on clinical year medical students' perceptions and feedback was conducted between February 2021 -June 2021 at the University of Hong Kong. Online learning activities were divided into bedside teaching, practical skill session, problem-based learning (PBL) or tutorial, and lecture. A questionnaire based on the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) was distributed to 716 clinical year students to document their perceptions.
One hundred responses were received with a response rate of 15.4% (110/716, including 96 from bedside teaching, 67 from practical skill session, 104 from PBL/tutorial, and 101 from lecture). For the mean score of the DREEM-extracted questionnaire, online PBL/tutorial scored the highest (2.72 ± 0.54), while bedside scored the lowest (2.38 ± 0.68, p = 0.001). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference when we compared different school years (p = 0.39), age (p = 0.37), gender (p = 1.00), year of internet experience (<17 vs ≥17 years p = 0.59), or prior online class experience (p = 0.62). When asked about students' preference for online vs face-to-face classes. Students showed higher preferences for online PBL/tutorial (2.06 ± 0.75) and lectures (2.27 ± 0.81). Distraction remains a significant problem across all four learning activities. A multivariate analysis was performed regarding students' reported behavior in comparison with their perception through the DREEM-extracted questionnaire. The results showed that good audio and video quality had a significant and positive correlation with their perception of online bedside teaching, practical skill sessions, and PBL/tutorial. It also showed that the use of the video camera correlated with an increase in perception scores for lectures.
The present analysis has demonstrated that students' perception of different online synchronous interactive learning activities varies. Further investigations are required on minimizing distraction during online classes.
COVID-19 全球大流行导致在线学习广泛开展。我们的主要目标是比较不同的在线同步互动学习活动,以评估学生的看法。此外,我们还旨在确定影响他们对这些课程看法的因素。
2021 年 2 月至 6 月在香港大学进行了一项以临床年级医学生的看法和反馈为重点的横断面、基于问卷的研究。根据邓迪教育环境量表(DREEM)设计的问卷,将在线学习活动分为床边教学、实践技能课程、基于问题的学习(PBL)或辅导、讲座。将问卷分发给 716 名临床年级学生,以记录他们的看法。
共收到 100 份回复,回复率为 15.4%(110/716,包括 96 份来自床边教学,67 份来自实践技能课程,104 份来自 PBL/辅导,101 份来自讲座)。对于 DREEM 提取问卷的平均分,在线 PBL/辅导得分最高(2.72±0.54),而床边教学得分最低(2.38±0.68,p=0.001)。同时,不同年级(p=0.39)、年龄(p=0.37)、性别(p=1.00)、互联网经验年数(<17 年与≥17 年,p=0.59)或之前的在线课程经验(p=0.62)之间差异无统计学意义。当被问及学生对在线与面对面课程的偏好时,学生对在线 PBL/辅导(2.06±0.75)和讲座(2.27±0.81)表现出更高的偏好。干扰仍然是所有四种学习活动中的一个重要问题。对学生报告的行为与通过 DREEM 提取问卷得出的看法进行了多变量分析。结果表明,音频和视频质量良好与他们对在线床边教学、实践技能课程和 PBL/辅导的看法具有显著的正相关关系。它还表明,使用摄像机会导致对讲座的看法得分增加。
本分析表明,学生对不同的在线同步互动学习活动的看法存在差异。需要进一步研究如何在在线课程中减少干扰。