• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

HEAR 和 HEART 评分对急诊科胸痛患者排除主要不良心脏事件的疗效:eCARE 逐步随机对照试验研究方案。

Efficacy of HEAR and HEART score to rule out major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: study protocol of the eCARE stepped-wedge randomised control trial.

机构信息

Département de Médecine d'Urgence, CHU d'Angers, Angers, France

Institut MitoVasc, UMR CNRS 6215 INSERM 1083, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 6;12(12):e066953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066953.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066953
PMID:36600358
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9730388/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines for patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) on ECG are based on serial troponin measurements. A clinical tool able to identify very low-risk patients who could forgo a troponin test and low-risk patients requiring only one troponin measurement would be of great interest. To do so, the HEAR and HEART score, standing for history, ECG, age, risk factors±troponin were prospectively assessed, but not combined and implemented in clinical practice. The objective of the eCARE study is to assess the impact of implementing a diagnostic strategy based on a HEAR score <2 or a HEART score <4 (HEAR-T strategy) to rule out non-STEMI without or with a single troponin measurement in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain without obvious diagnosis after physical examination and an ECG.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Stepped-wedge cluster-randomised control trial in 10 EDs. Patients with non-traumatic chest pain and no formal diagnosis were included and followed for 30 days. In the interventional phase, the doctor will be asked not to perform a troponin test to look for an acute coronary if the HEAR score is <2 and not to perform an additional troponin test if the HEAR score is ≥2 and HEART score is <4. The main endpoint is the non-inferiority of the rates of major adverse cardiac events occurring between a patient's discharge and the 30-day follow-up against current recommended guidelines.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study was approved by an institutional review board for all participating centres. If successful, the eCARE study will cover a gap in the evidence, proving that it is safe and efficient to rule out the hypothesis of an acute myocardial infarction in some selected very low-risk patients or based on a single troponin measurement in some low-risk patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04157790.

摘要

简介

目前,对于心电图无 ST 段抬高心肌梗死(STEMI)的胸痛患者,急诊科(ED)的处理指南基于连续肌钙蛋白测量。如果有一种临床工具能够识别出极低危患者,使其无需进行肌钙蛋白检测,或仅需进行一次肌钙蛋白测量就能识别出低危患者,将具有重要意义。为此,前瞻性评估了 HEAR(代表病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素±肌钙蛋白)和 HEART(代表病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素、充血性心力衰竭、血管疾病、年龄、肌酐、troponin)评分,但并未将两者组合并应用于临床实践。eCARE 研究的目的是评估基于 HEAR 评分<2 或 HEART 评分<4(HEAR-T 策略)排除无明显诊断的 ED 胸痛患者非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(NSTEMI)的诊断策略,不进行或仅进行一次肌钙蛋白检测。

方法和分析

这是一项在 10 家 ED 进行的阶梯式楔形集群随机对照试验。纳入非创伤性胸痛且体检和心电图无明确诊断的患者,并进行 30 天随访。在干预阶段,如果 HEAR 评分<2,医生将被要求不进行肌钙蛋白检测以寻找急性冠状动脉疾病;如果 HEAR 评分≥2 且 HEART 评分<4,则医生将被要求不进行额外的肌钙蛋白检测。主要终点是在患者出院至 30 天随访期间,主要不良心脏事件发生率不劣于当前推荐指南。

伦理和传播

该研究得到了所有参与中心的机构审查委员会的批准。如果成功,eCARE 研究将填补证据空白,证明在某些特定的极低危患者中,或在某些低危患者中基于单次肌钙蛋白测量排除急性心肌梗死假说,是安全且有效的。

试验注册号

NCT04157790。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df11/9730388/b39acd29bf8a/bmjopen-2022-066953f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df11/9730388/b2d493d4f31e/bmjopen-2022-066953f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df11/9730388/b39acd29bf8a/bmjopen-2022-066953f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df11/9730388/b2d493d4f31e/bmjopen-2022-066953f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/df11/9730388/b39acd29bf8a/bmjopen-2022-066953f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy of HEAR and HEART score to rule out major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: study protocol of the eCARE stepped-wedge randomised control trial.HEAR 和 HEART 评分对急诊科胸痛患者排除主要不良心脏事件的疗效:eCARE 逐步随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 6;12(12):e066953. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066953.
2
Evaluation of HEAR score to rule-out major adverse cardiac events without troponin test in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain.运用 HEAR 评分系统,在急诊科胸痛就诊患者中,无需进行肌钙蛋白检测即可排除主要不良心脏事件。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2021 Aug 1;28(4):292-298. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000000791.
3
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前改良HEART评分对30天不良心脏事件的预测作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
4
Randomised controlled trial of the Limit of Detection of Troponin and ECG Discharge (LoDED) strategy versus usual care in adult patients with chest pain attending the emergency department: study protocol.急诊科胸痛成年患者肌钙蛋白检测限与心电图出院(LoDED)策略对比常规治疗的随机对照试验:研究方案
BMJ Open. 2018 Oct 2;8(10):e025339. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025339.
5
External validation of a low HEAR score to identify emergency department chest pain patients at very low risk of major adverse cardiac events without troponin testing.低HEAR评分用于识别无需肌钙蛋白检测、发生重大不良心脏事件风险极低的急诊科胸痛患者的外部验证。
CJEM. 2022 Jan;24(1):68-74. doi: 10.1007/s43678-021-00159-y. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
6
Assessing sensitivity and specificity of the Manchester Triage System in the evaluation of acute coronary syndrome in adult patients in emergency care: a systematic review protocol.评估曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中评估成年急性冠状动脉综合征患者时的敏感性和特异性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):64-73. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2213.
7
Identifying low-risk chest pain in the emergency department without troponin testing: a validation study of the HE-MACS and HEAR risk scores.在急诊室不进行肌钙蛋白检测识别低危胸痛:HE-MACS 和 HEAR 风险评分的验证研究。
Emerg Med J. 2022 Jul;39(7):515-518. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2021-211669. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
8
Acute rule-out of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the (pre)hospital setting by HEART score assessment and a single point-of-care troponin: rationale and design of the ARTICA randomised trial.通过 HEART 评分评估和单点即时检测肌钙蛋白在(院前)环境中对非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征的急性排除:ARTICA 随机试验的原理和设计。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 17;10(2):e034403. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034403.
9
HEART Score Risk Stratification of Low-Risk Chest Pain Patients in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.急诊低危胸痛患者 HEART 评分风险分层:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;74(2):187-203. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2018.12.010. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
10
Pre-hospital evaluation of chest pain patients using the modified HEART-score: rationale and design.采用改良的 HEART 评分对胸痛患者进行院前评估:原理和设计。
Future Cardiol. 2024 Apr 25;20(5-6):241-250. doi: 10.1080/14796678.2024.2356995. Epub 2024 Jun 28.