Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022 Dec;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001389.
The Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI-2012) focused on race/ethnicity as an important factor in determining reference values. This study evaluated the effects of changing from Canadian reference equations developed from an all-Caucasian cohort with European ancestry to the GLI-2012 on the interpretation of spirometry in a multiethnic population and aimed to identify the ethnic groups affected by discrepant interpretations.
Clinically indicated spirometry in a multiethnic population (aged 20-80 years) collected from 2018 to 2021 was analysed. The predicted and lower limit of normal (LLN) values were calculated using three sets of reference equations: Canadian, GLI-race/ethnic-based (GLI-Race) and GLI-race/ethnic-neutral (GLI-Other). We compared the prevalence of concordance in the abnormal diagnoses (defined as <LLN) for forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV), and FEV/FVC among the three reference values, and evaluated whether race/ethnicity was associated with discordance.
Data from 406 participants were evaluated (non-Caucasian 43.6%). There was 85%-87% concordance for normal/abnormal FVC and FEV interpretations among the Canadian, GLI-Race and GLI-Other reference equations. In all ethnic groups, application of the Canadian references for interpretation led to a higher prevalence of abnormal (<LLN) FVC and FEVcompared with GLI-Race and GLI-Other. This trend was more prominent in Black, South-East Asian and Mixed/other ethnic groups when comparing the Canadian to the GLI-Race equations. In contrast, the discordance rates were similar among ethnic groups when compared with the GLI-Other reference equations. Interpretation of FEV/FVC had a high rate of agreement among all equations.
Interpretation using Canadian reference equations was associated with a higher prevalence of restrictive physiology compared with the GLI-2012 equations, particularly if the GLI-Race were used. These observations were mostly found in non-white Caucasian groups, highlighting the need to choose reference equations that reflect closely the ethnic mix of the population being evaluated in order to optimise patient management.
全球肺功能倡议(GLI-2012)专注于种族/民族作为确定参考值的一个重要因素。本研究评估了从一个以欧洲血统为主的全白种人群中开发的加拿大参考方程转变为 GLI-2012 对多民族人群肺功能检测的解读的影响,并旨在确定受不同解读影响的种族群体。
对 2018 年至 2021 年期间收集的多民族人群(年龄 20-80 岁)进行临床指征的肺功能检测。使用三套参考方程计算预测值和下限正常值(LLN):加拿大、基于种族/民族的 GLI-race/ethnic-based(GLI-Race)和基于种族/民族中立的 GLI-race/ethnic-neutral(GLI-Other)。我们比较了三套参考值之间用力肺活量(FVC)、1 秒用力呼气量(FEV)和 FEV/FVC 异常诊断(定义为<LLN)的一致性患病率,并评估了种族/民族是否与不一致性相关。
共评估了 406 名参与者的数据(非白种人占 43.6%)。在加拿大、GLI-Race 和 GLI-Other 参考方程中,FVC 和 FEV 正常/异常的一致性为 85%-87%。在所有种族群体中,应用加拿大参考值进行解读导致 FVC 和 FEV<LLN 的异常比例高于 GLI-Race 和 GLI-Other。当将加拿大参考值与 GLI-Race 方程进行比较时,这种趋势在黑种人、东南亚人和混血/其他种族群体中更为明显。相比之下,当与 GLI-Other 参考值进行比较时,不同种族群体之间的不一致率相似。FEV/FVC 的解读在所有方程中具有很高的一致性。
与 GLI-2012 方程相比,使用加拿大参考值进行解读与限制性生理更为相关,特别是如果使用 GLI-Race 方程。这些观察结果主要在非白种人群中发现,这凸显了需要选择尽可能反映评估人群种族构成的参考值,以优化患者管理。