• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全球肺功能倡议全球肺量计参考方程在大型多中心肺功能实验室人群中的应用。

Application of Global Lung Function Initiative Global Spirometry Reference Equations across a Large, Multicenter Pulmonary Function Lab Population.

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, and.

Information Technology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and.

出版信息

Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;209(1):83-90. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202303-0613OC.

DOI:10.1164/rccm.202303-0613OC
PMID:37523681
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10870880/
Abstract

Global Lung Function Initiative (GLI) Global spirometry reference equations were recently derived to offer a "race-neutral" interpretation option. The impact of transitioning from the race-specific GLI-2012 to the GLI Global reference equations is unknown. Describe the direction and magnitude of changes in predicted lung function measurements in a population of diverse race and ethnicity using GLI Global in place of GLI-2012 reference equations. In this multicenter cross-sectional study using a large pulmonary function laboratory database, 109,447 spirometry tests were reanalyzed using GLI Global reference equations and compared with the existing GLI-2012 standard, stratified by self-reported race and ethnicity. Mean FEV and FVC percent predicted increased in the White and Northeast Asian groups and decreased in the Black, Southeast Asian, and mixed/other race groups. The prevalence of obstruction increased by 9.7% in the White group, and prevalences of possible restriction increased by 51.1% and 37.1% in the Black and Southeast Asian groups, respectively. Using GLI Global in a population with equal representation of all five race and ethnicity groups altered the interpretation category for 10.2% of spirometry tests. Subjects who self-identified as Black were the only group with a relative increase in the frequency of abnormal spirometry test results (32.9%). The use of GLI Global reference equations will significantly impact spirometry interpretation. Although GLI Global offers an innovative approach to transition from race-specific reference equations, it is important to recognize the continued need to place these data within an appropriate clinical context.

摘要

全球肺功能倡议(GLI)最近推导出了全球肺功能参考方程,以提供“无种族偏见”的解释选项。从特定种族的 GLI-2012 过渡到 GLI 全球参考方程的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在描述使用 GLI 全球替代 GLI-2012 参考方程时,不同种族和族裔人群的预测肺功能测量值变化的方向和幅度。在这项使用大型肺功能实验室数据库的多中心横断面研究中,重新分析了 109,447 次肺功能检查,使用 GLI 全球参考方程,并按自我报告的种族和族裔分层,与现有的 GLI-2012 标准进行比较。白人和东北亚人群的 FEV 和 FVC 预计百分比增加,而黑种人、东南亚人和混合/其他种族人群的 FEV 和 FVC 预计百分比降低。白种人群中阻塞的患病率增加了 9.7%,黑种人和东南亚人群中可能受限的患病率分别增加了 51.1%和 37.1%。在代表所有五个种族和族裔群体的人群中使用 GLI 全球会改变 10.2%的肺功能检查的解释类别。自我认定为黑人的受试者是唯一一组异常肺功能检查结果频率相对增加的人群(32.9%)。GLI 全球参考方程的使用将对肺功能检查的解释产生重大影响。尽管 GLI 全球提供了一种从特定种族参考方程过渡的创新方法,但重要的是要认识到仍然需要将这些数据置于适当的临床背景下。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10870880/9dd3eeefb66e/rccm.202303-0613OCf5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10870880/10f9a0c80254/rccm.202303-0613OCf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10870880/d4b84ff964a1/rccm.202303-0613OCf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10870880/36e082916432/rccm.202303-0613OCf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10870880/b859fce457b0/rccm.202303-0613OCf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10870880/9dd3eeefb66e/rccm.202303-0613OCf5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10870880/10f9a0c80254/rccm.202303-0613OCf1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10870880/d4b84ff964a1/rccm.202303-0613OCf2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10870880/36e082916432/rccm.202303-0613OCf3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10870880/b859fce457b0/rccm.202303-0613OCf4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f7e7/10870880/9dd3eeefb66e/rccm.202303-0613OCf5.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of Global Lung Function Initiative Global Spirometry Reference Equations across a Large, Multicenter Pulmonary Function Lab Population.全球肺功能倡议全球肺量计参考方程在大型多中心肺功能实验室人群中的应用。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 1;209(1):83-90. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202303-0613OC.
2
Changes in interpretation of spirometry by implementing the GLI 2012 reference equations: impact on patients tested in a hospital-based PFT lab in a large metropolitan city.实施 GLI 2012 参考方程后对肺量测定解读的改变:对大型都市基于医院的 PFT 实验室中测试的患者的影响。
BMJ Open Respir Res. 2022 Dec;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjresp-2022-001389.
3
Race-Neutral Equations and Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation in Two Pediatric Cohorts.种族中立方程与两种儿科队列肺功能测试解读。
J Pediatr. 2024 Oct;273:114124. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2024.114124. Epub 2024 May 28.
4
Spirometry Interpretation After Implementation of Race-Neutral Reference Equations in Children.实施种族中性参考方程后对儿童肺功能检测结果的解读。
JAMA Pediatr. 2024 Jul 1;178(7):699-706. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2024.1341.
5
A Race-neutral Approach to the Interpretation of Lung Function Measurements.一种不基于种族的解读肺功能测量的方法。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Mar 15;207(6):768-774. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202205-0963OC.
6
Global Lung Function Initiative 2012 reference values for spirometry in South Italian children.全球肺功能倡议 2012 年南意大利儿童肺量计参考值。
Respir Med. 2017 Oct;131:11-17. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.07.061. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
7
The impact of switching to race-neutral reference equations on FEV percent predicted among people with cystic fibrosis.切换到种族中性参考方程对囊性纤维化患者的 FEV%预计值的影响。
J Cyst Fibros. 2024 May;23(3):443-449. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2024.03.013. Epub 2024 Mar 30.
8
Comparison of race-specific and race-neutral GLI spirometric reference equations with an Indian reference equation.种族特异性和种族中性 GLI 肺量计参考方程与印度参考方程的比较。
Respir Med. 2024 Oct;232:107764. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107764. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
9
Which reference equation should we use for interpreting spirometry values for First Nations Australians? A cross-sectional study.我们应该使用哪个参考方程来解释澳大利亚原住民的肺活量值?一项横断面研究。
Med J Aust. 2024 Jun 3;220(10):523-529. doi: 10.5694/mja2.52306. Epub 2024 May 13.
10
Race/Ethnicity, Spirometry Reference Equations, and Prediction of Incident Clinical Events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Lung Study.种族/族裔、肺量计参考方程与临床事件发生的预测:动脉粥样硬化多族裔研究(MESA)肺部研究
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 15;205(6):700-710. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202107-1612OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Worldwide practices in pulmonary function test reporting after lung transplantation.肺移植术后肺功能测试报告的全球实践。
JHLT Open. 2025 Jul 16;9:100347. doi: 10.1016/j.jhlto.2025.100347. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Spirometry interpretation in Africa: bridging the gap with relevant reference equations.非洲的肺功能测试解读:借助相关参考方程缩小差距
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Jul 21;11(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00186-2025. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Clinical Algorithms and the Legacy of Race-Based Correction: Historical Errors, Contemporary Revisions and Equity-Oriented Methodologies for Epidemiologists.

本文引用的文献

1
Race and Ethnicity in Pulmonary Function Test Interpretation: An Official American Thoracic Society Statement.肺功能测试解读中的种族和民族差异:美国胸科学会官方声明。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Apr 15;207(8):978-995. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202302-0310ST.
2
Effect of Race and Ethnicity on Pulmonary Function Testing Interpretation: An American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST), American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC), American Thoracic Society (ATS), and Canadian Thoracic Society (CTS) Evidence Review and Research Statement.种族和民族对肺功能测试解读的影响:美国胸科学会(CHEST)、美国呼吸治疗协会(AARC)、美国胸科学会(ATS)和加拿大胸科学会(CTS)的证据综述和研究声明。
Chest. 2023 Aug;164(2):461-475. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.03.026. Epub 2023 Mar 25.
3
临床算法与基于种族校正的遗产:历史错误、当代修订以及面向公平的流行病学家方法学
Clin Epidemiol. 2025 Jul 12;17:647-662. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S527000. eCollection 2025.
4
Race-neutral versus race-specific GLI reference equations on spirometry interpretation in the general population.一般人群中肺量计解读的种族中性与种族特异性GLI参考方程
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 2;15(1):23569. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04653-6.
5
Lung Function Trajectory Using Race-Specific vs Race-Neutral Global Lung Function Initiative Coefficients.使用特定种族与种族中性的全球肺功能倡议系数的肺功能轨迹
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e257304. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.7304.
6
The effect of a post-bronchodilator FEV/FVC < 0.7 on COPD diagnosis and treatment: a regression discontinuity design.支气管扩张剂后FEV/FVC < 0.7对慢性阻塞性肺疾病诊断和治疗的影响:一项回归间断性设计
Respir Res. 2025 Apr 1;26(1):122. doi: 10.1186/s12931-025-03198-6.
7
Race-Specific and Race-Neutral Equations for Lung Function and Asthma Diagnosis in Black Children.用于黑人儿童肺功能和哮喘诊断的种族特异性及种族中性方程。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Feb 3;8(2):e2462176. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.62176.
8
Race-specific to GLI multi-ethnic to race-neutral GLI Global prediction equations for spirometry - which is the right option for Indians?从种族特异性的肺功能指数(GLI)到多民族通用再到种族中立的GLI 肺活量测定的全球预测方程——对印度人来说哪个才是正确的选择?
Lung India. 2025 Mar 1;42(2):84-86. doi: 10.4103/lungindia.lungindia_532_24. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
9
Inbuilt Errors: A Call for Standardized Definitions.内在错误:呼吁标准化定义。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2025 Apr;211(4):663-664. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202411-2183LE.
10
A Normal Forced Vital Capacity Does Not Reliably or Equitably Exclude Restriction.正常的用力肺活量并不能可靠或公平地排除限制。
medRxiv. 2024 Oct 23:2024.10.22.24315945. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.22.24315945.
Spirometry in 2022: Is a Single Set of Prediction Equations for All the Best Path Forward?2022年的肺功能测定:一套适用于所有人的预测方程是最佳前进方向吗?
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Mar 15;207(6):659-661. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202211-2181ED.
4
A Race-neutral Approach to the Interpretation of Lung Function Measurements.一种不基于种族的解读肺功能测量的方法。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2023 Mar 15;207(6):768-774. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202205-0963OC.
5
Things We Do for No Reason™: Race adjustments in calculating lung function from spirometry measurements.我们无端为之的事情™:肺活量测定法测量结果计算肺功能时的种族校正
J Hosp Med. 2023 Sep;18(9):845-847. doi: 10.1002/jhm.12974. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
6
Research race-specific reference values and lung function impairment, breathlessness and prognosis: Analysis of NHANES 2007-2012.研究种族特异性参考值与肺功能损害、呼吸困难和预后:NHANES 2007-2012 分析。
Respir Res. 2022 Oct 1;23(1):271. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02194-4.
7
U.S. Occupational Historical Perspective on Race and Lung Function.美国关于种族与肺功能的职业历史视角。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Sep 15;206(6):789-790. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202203-0565LE.
8
Is There a Role for Using Race-Specific Reference Equations? Yes and No.使用种族特异性参考方程是否有作用?答案是有也没有。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;205(7):746-748. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202201-0006ED.
9
Reconsidering the Utility of Race-Specific Lung Function Prediction Equations.重新考虑种族特异性肺功能预测方程的实用性。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Apr 1;205(7):819-829. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202105-1246OC.
10
Race/Ethnicity, Spirometry Reference Equations, and Prediction of Incident Clinical Events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) Lung Study.种族/族裔、肺量计参考方程与临床事件发生的预测:动脉粥样硬化多族裔研究(MESA)肺部研究
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 15;205(6):700-710. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202107-1612OC.