Department of Restorative and Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Feb;9(1):45-54. doi: 10.1002/cre2.708. Epub 2023 Jan 4.
Aramany's classification of postsurgical maxillectomy defects was introduced for partially edentulous situations, and has been widely used for education and effective communication among practitioners. Numerous classifications of maxillofacial defects, based on surgical procedure, resultant defects, or prosthodontist's perspective after rehabilitation, exist in the literature. However, no single classification has incorporated all these factors. The purpose of this review was to highlight the classification systems and describe a pragmatic classification series for edentulous maxillary arch defects (maxillectomy) by applying the Aramany classification criteria, to enhance treatment outcomes and communication among practitioners.
An electronic search of the literature published in English was conducted using the PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar database. Keywords used were "maxillectomy classification" AND "surgical resection," "maxillectomy classification" AND "complete edentulous." In addition, a manual search was also performed followed the same criteria in the following journals: Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry and Journal of Prosthodontics.
Several classification systems for partial dentition were found in terms of size, location, dentition, and extension of the defect (isolated or communication defects). The findings revealed a variety of maxillectomy defect classifications for partially dentate, considering surgical factors and rehabilitation. However, no study or classification system exist for the edentulous arch defects.
Different classification systems for maxillectomy defects exist in the literature, only for partially dentate patients. To the authors best knowledge, no classification system for completely edentulous maxillary arch defects have been proposed till date. A simple classification system with clear characteristics for edentulous maxillectomy dental arch defects has been proposed. This classification was modeled after Aramany classification for easier memorization and application.
Aramany 的上颌骨部分切除术后缺损分类法是为部分无牙患者引入的,已被广泛用于教育和医生之间的有效沟通。在文献中,存在基于手术过程、术后缺损或修复后的义齿医生观点的众多颌面缺损分类法。然而,没有一种分类法包含了所有这些因素。本文旨在回顾这些分类系统,并根据 Aramany 分类标准,描述一种用于无牙上颌骨弓缺损(上颌骨切除术)的实用分类系列,以提高治疗效果和医生之间的沟通效果。
使用 PubMed/MEDLINE 和 Google Scholar 数据库对发表在英文文献中的文献进行电子检索。使用的关键词是“上颌骨切除术分类”和“手术切除”、“上颌骨切除术分类”和“完全无牙”。此外,还按照相同的标准在以下期刊中进行了手动搜索:《修复牙科杂志》和《修复学杂志》。
发现了几种关于部分义齿大小、位置、牙齿和缺损(孤立或沟通性缺损)的扩展的分类系统。研究结果显示,考虑到手术因素和修复,存在多种针对部分义齿患者的上颌骨切除术缺陷分类。然而,对于无牙弓缺损,没有研究或分类系统存在。
文献中存在多种上颌骨切除术缺陷分类法,仅适用于部分义齿患者。据作者所知,迄今为止,尚未提出用于完全无牙上颌骨弓缺损的分类系统。本文提出了一种简单的分类系统,具有明确的无牙上颌骨切除术牙弓缺损特征。这种分类是在 Aramany 分类的基础上建立的,以便于记忆和应用。