Viigimaa Margus, Jürisson Mikk, Pisarev Heti, Kalda Ruth, Alavere Helene, Irs Alar, Saar Aet, Fischer Krista, Läll Kristi, Kruuv-Käo Krista, Mars Nina, Widen Elisabeth, Ripatti Samuli, Metspalu Andres
Department of Health Technologies, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia.
Centre of Cardiology, North Estonia Medical Centre, Sütiste St. 19, 13419 Tallinn, Estonia.
Eur Heart J Open. 2022 Dec 15;2(6):oeac079. doi: 10.1093/ehjopen/oeac079. eCollection 2022 Nov.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the intervention by proactively sharing a patient's high polygenic risk score (PRS) for coronary artery disease (CAD). Outcomes included: (i) reduction in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors over 12 months; (ii) difference in purchased prescriptions of lipid-lowering and anti-hypertensive drugs between intervention group and control group subjects; and (iii) opinion of the participating physicians and subjects on PRS usefulness.
This randomized controlled trial was conducted among middle-aged subjects with a top 20% CAD PRS in a family medicine setting. Participants were selected from 26 953 Estonian Biobank cohort participants. Subjects were informed and counselled about their PRS score and CAD risk using the visual tool at baseline (Visit I), counselling session (Visit II), and on the final Visit III at 12 months. The primary endpoint was not significantly different. However, the intervention group participants had a significantly higher probability of initiating statin treatment compared with the controls. Their levels of LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) were significantly decreased compared with baseline on Visit III and significantly lower than in the control group. The vast majority of participating family physicians believe that finding out about genetic risks will affect the subject's lifestyle and medication compliance.
Most of our outcome measures were in favour of this intervention. Participants achieved larger changes in cholesterol and blood pressure values. The vast majority (98.4%) of family physicians are interested in continuing to use genetic risk assessment in practice.
本研究旨在评估主动分享患者冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的高多基因风险评分(PRS)所产生的干预效果。结果包括:(i)12个月内心血管疾病(CVD)风险因素的降低情况;(ii)干预组和对照组受试者在降脂和抗高血压药物购买处方方面的差异;(iii)参与研究的医生和受试者对PRS有用性的看法。
本随机对照试验在家庭医学环境中对CAD PRS处于前20%的中年受试者进行。参与者从26953名爱沙尼亚生物银行队列参与者中选取。在基线(第一次访视)、咨询环节(第二次访视)以及12个月后的最后一次访视(第三次访视)时,使用视觉工具向受试者告知并咨询其PRS评分和CAD风险。主要终点无显著差异。然而,与对照组相比,干预组参与者开始他汀类药物治疗的概率显著更高。在第三次访视时,他们的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)水平与基线相比显著降低,且显著低于对照组。绝大多数参与研究的家庭医生认为,了解遗传风险会影响受试者的生活方式和用药依从性。
我们的大多数结果指标都支持这种干预措施。参与者在胆固醇和血压值方面实现了更大的变化。绝大多数(98.4%)家庭医生有兴趣在实践中继续使用遗传风险评估。