College of Journalism and Communications, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Center & Department of Biostatistics, University of Florida Health Cancer Center, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Aug;38(4):1234-1240. doi: 10.1007/s13187-022-02253-w. Epub 2023 Jan 5.
The objective of this study is to evaluate thyroid cancer risk clinician-patient communication among patients receiving usual counseling and counseling enhanced by a conversation aid. A secondary analysis of clinical visit recordings and post-visit surveys obtained during a trial assessing the impact of a conversation aid for patients with thyroid nodules was conducted. We assessed how thyroid cancer risk was communicated, different risk communication strategies between groups, and predictors of accurate cancer risk perception. Fifty-nine patients were analyzed. Most were women (90%) and middle-aged (median 57 years). A verbal description of thyroid cancer risk was present most frequently (83%) and was more frequent in the conversation aid than the usual care group (100% vs. 63%, p < 0.001). A numerical description using percentages was present in 41% of visits and was more frequent in the conversation aid group (59% vs. 19%, p = 0.012). Natural frequencies (7%) and positive/negative framing (10%) were utilized less commonly. Uncertainty about risks was not discussed. No predictors of accurate risk perception were identified. Clinicians most commonly present a verbal description of thyroid cancer risk. Less commonly, natural frequencies, negative/positive framing, or uncertainty is discussed. Clinicians caring for patients with thyroid nodules should be aware of different strategies for communicating thyroid cancer risk.
本研究旨在评估在接受常规咨询和使用对话辅助工具增强的咨询的患者中,甲状腺癌风险医患沟通的情况。我们对一项评估甲状腺结节患者使用对话辅助工具对其影响的试验中获得的临床就诊记录和就诊后调查进行了二次分析。我们评估了甲状腺癌风险是如何沟通的,不同组之间的风险沟通策略,以及准确的癌症风险感知的预测因素。对 59 名患者进行了分析。大多数是女性(90%)和中年(中位数 57 岁)。最常见的是口头描述甲状腺癌风险(83%),而且在使用对话辅助工具的组中比在常规护理组中更常见(100%比 63%,p<0.001)。在 41%的就诊中使用了百分比的数值描述,而且在使用对话辅助工具的组中更常见(59%比 19%,p=0.012)。自然频率(7%)和正负框架(10%)的使用频率较低。未讨论风险的不确定性。没有确定准确风险感知的预测因素。临床医生最常描述甲状腺癌风险的口头描述。不太常见的是,自然频率、正负框架或不确定性会被讨论。照顾甲状腺结节患者的临床医生应该意识到沟通甲状腺癌风险的不同策略。