Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit in Endocrinology (KER-Endo), Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Endocrine. 2018 Sep;61(3):482-488. doi: 10.1007/s12020-018-1639-8. Epub 2018 Jun 16.
Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid is an increasingly common outpatient procedure. Patients are counseled about the indications and risks of this procedure and informed consent is obtained. We aimed to assess the extent to which patients acquired necessary knowledge during this process.
Survey study conducted in a thyroid nodule clinic at a referral center. Adult patients who had just undergone a thyroid biopsy were asked to complete a survey, including eight questions regarding the indications and potential outcomes of thyroid biopsy. The main outcome of the study was to assess the patients' knowledge based on the response to each individual survey question.
Two-hundred and ninety-seven patients were eligible, of which 196 (66%) completed the survey: most were women (76%), had adequate reading health literacy (95%) and a mean age of 58 years. Although 86% of patients correctly identified evaluation for thyroid cancer as the main indication for their biopsy, 56% were not aware of the likelihood of this diagnosis. Almost all (>90%) of respondents knew that results could be benign or malignant; fewer were aware of non-diagnostic (71%) or indeterminate (68%) outcomes, or of the need for additional diagnostic testing after the biopsy (33%).
After undergoing thyroid biopsy, a high proportion of well-educated patients remained unaware of their risk for thyroid cancer, potential outcomes, and downstream consequences of their biopsy. This quality gap raises the possibility that informed consent procedures that meet legal standards may leave patients undergoing thyroid biopsy paradoxically uninformed.
甲状腺细针穿刺活检是一种日益常见的门诊操作。患者会接受关于该操作适应证和风险的咨询,并签署知情同意书。我们旨在评估患者在这一过程中获得必要知识的程度。
在一家转诊中心的甲状腺结节诊所进行了一项调查研究。刚刚接受过甲状腺活检的成年患者被要求完成一项调查,其中包括 8 个关于甲状腺活检适应证和潜在结果的问题。本研究的主要结果是根据对每个单独调查问题的回答来评估患者的知识。
297 名患者符合条件,其中 196 名(66%)完成了调查:大多数是女性(76%),有足够的阅读健康素养(95%),平均年龄为 58 岁。尽管 86%的患者正确识别出评估甲状腺癌是其活检的主要适应证,但 56%的患者并不知道这种诊断的可能性。几乎所有(>90%)的受访者都知道结果可能是良性或恶性;较少的人知道非诊断性(71%)或不确定(68%)的结果,或在活检后需要额外的诊断性检查(33%)。
在接受甲状腺活检后,相当一部分受过良好教育的患者仍然不知道自己患甲状腺癌的风险、潜在结果以及活检的后续后果。这种质量差距表明,符合法律标准的知情同意程序可能会让接受甲状腺活检的患者处于知情但实际上并不知情的悖论中。