Suppr超能文献

支持初级保健中的护理参与;成熟度矩阵的开发。

Supporting care engagement in primary care; the development of a maturity matrix.

机构信息

Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Scientific Center for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Department of Registration, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 5;18(1):e0279542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279542. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Care engagement or active patient involvement in healthcare contributes to the quality of primary care, but organisational preconditions in routine practice need to be aligned. A Maturity Matrix for Care Engagement to assess and discuss these preconditions in the general practice team was developed and tested on feasibility and acceptability in general practice.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

A systematic user-centred approach was applied, starting with a scoping literature search to describe the domains on the horizontal axis of the maturity matrix. The domains and growing steps (vertical axis) were refined by patients (n = 16) and general practice staff (n = 11) in three focus group discussions and reviewed by six experts (local facilitators and scientists). Seven domains could be distinguished: Personalised Care, Shared Decision Making, Self-Management, Patient as Partner, Supportive Means, Patient Environment, and Teamwork among Healthcare Professionals. The growing steps described three to six activities per domain (n = 32 in total) that contribute to care engagement. Local facilitators implemented the tool in two general practice teams according to a user guide, starting with a two-hour kick-off meeting on care engagement. In the next step, practitioners, nurses and assistants in each practice indicated their score on the domains individually. The scores were discussed in the facilitated practice meeting which was aimed at SMART improvement plans. Feasibility and acceptability were assessed in interviews showing that the tool was well received by the pilot practices, although the practice assistants had difficulties scoring some of the activities as they did not always relate to their daily work. An assessment after three months showed changes in practice organisation towards increased care engagement.

CONCLUSIONS

The maturity matrix on care engagement is a tool to identify the organisational practice maturity for care engagement. Suggested adaptations must be implemented before large-scale testing.

摘要

背景

护理参与或患者积极参与医疗保健有助于提高初级保健质量,但在常规实践中需要调整组织前提条件。已经开发出一种护理参与成熟度矩阵,用于评估和讨论全科医疗团队中的这些前提条件,并在全科医疗中对其可行性和可接受性进行了测试。

方法和发现

采用系统的以用户为中心的方法,首先进行范围广泛的文献检索,以描述成熟度矩阵横轴上的领域。通过 3 次焦点小组讨论,由患者(n=16)和全科医疗人员(n=11)对领域和发展步骤(纵轴)进行细化,并由 6 名专家(当地促进者和科学家)进行审查。可以区分出 7 个领域:个性化护理、共同决策、自我管理、患者作为伙伴、支持手段、患者环境以及医疗保健专业人员之间的团队合作。发展步骤描述了每个领域的三到六个活动(总共 n=32),这些活动有助于护理参与。当地促进者根据用户指南在两个全科医疗团队中实施该工具,首先进行两小时的护理参与启动会议。在下一步中,每个实践中的医生、护士和助手分别对各个领域的得分进行说明。在促进实践会议上讨论这些得分,旨在制定 SMART 改进计划。通过访谈评估了可行性和可接受性,结果表明,该工具受到试点实践的欢迎,尽管实践助理在评分一些活动时遇到了困难,因为这些活动并不总是与他们的日常工作相关。三个月后的评估显示,实践组织朝着提高护理参与度的方向发生了变化。

结论

护理参与成熟度矩阵是一种用于确定护理参与组织实践成熟度的工具。在进行大规模测试之前,必须实施建议的调整。

相似文献

1
Supporting care engagement in primary care; the development of a maturity matrix.
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 5;18(1):e0279542. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279542. eCollection 2023.
2
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
5
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Determining implementation issues of open notes in primary care: a focus group study.
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Apr 22;26(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02805-1.

本文引用的文献

1
All together now - patient engagement, patient empowerment, and associated terms in personal healthcare.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 2;22(1):1116. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08501-5.
4
Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare.
BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 15;9(8):e029954. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029954.
5
6
Engaging patients in primary care design: An evaluation of a novel approach to codesigning care.
Health Expect. 2019 Aug;22(4):609-616. doi: 10.1111/hex.12909. Epub 2019 May 27.
7
Patients' perceptions of team-based care in family practice: access, benefits and team roles.
J Prim Health Care. 2018 Oct;10(3):248-257. doi: 10.1071/HC18018.
8
Engaging Patients in Primary Care Quality Improvement Initiatives: Facilitators and Barriers.
Am J Med Qual. 2020 Jan/Feb;35(1):52-62. doi: 10.1177/1062860619842938. Epub 2019 Apr 18.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验