Elwyn G, Rhydderch M, Edwards A, Hutchings H, Marshall M, Myres P, Grol R
University of Wales, Swansea SA2 8PP, UK.
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug;13(4):287-94. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.4.287.
To design and develop an instrument to assess the degree of organisational development achieved in primary medical care organisations.
An iterative development, feasibility and validation study of an organisational assessment instrument.
Primary medical care organisations.
Primary care teams and external facilitators.
Responses to an evaluation questionnaire, qualitative process feedback, hypothesis testing, and quantitative psychometric analysis (face and construct validity) of the results of a Maturity Matrix assessment in 55 primary medical care organisations.
Evaluations by 390 participants revealed high face validity with respect to its usefulness as a review and planning tool at the practice level. Feedback from facilitators suggests that it helped practices to prioritise their organisational development. With respect to construct validity, there was some support for the hypothesis that training and non-training status affected the degree and pattern of organisational development. The size of the organisation did not have a significant impact on the degree of organisational development.
This practice based facilitated group evaluation method was found to be both useful and enjoyable by the participating organisations. Psychometric validation revealed high face validity. Further developments are in place to ensure acceptability for summative work (benchmarking) and formative feedback processes (quality improvement).
设计并开发一种工具,以评估基层医疗保健机构实现的组织发展程度。
对一种组织评估工具进行迭代开发、可行性和验证研究。
基层医疗保健机构。
基层医疗团队和外部促进者。
对一份评估问卷的回答、定性过程反馈、假设检验,以及对55个基层医疗保健机构成熟度矩阵评估结果的定量心理测量分析(表面效度和结构效度)。
390名参与者的评估显示,该工具作为实践层面的审查和规划工具具有较高的表面效度。促进者的反馈表明,它有助于各机构确定其组织发展的优先事项。关于结构效度,有一些证据支持以下假设:培训和未培训状态会影响组织发展的程度和模式。组织规模对组织发展程度没有显著影响。
参与机构认为这种基于实践的促进小组评估方法既有用又有趣。心理测量验证显示具有较高的表面效度。正在进行进一步开发,以确保其适用于总结性工作(基准评估)和形成性反馈过程(质量改进)。