Suppr超能文献

基于移动应用的应对技能训练对心肺衰竭幸存者的可行性:蓝图试点随机对照试验。

Feasibility of Mobile App-based Coping Skills Training for Cardiorespiratory Failure Survivors: The Blueprint Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.

Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER).

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Jun;20(6):861-871. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202210-890OC.

Abstract

Psychological distress symptoms are common among patients recently hospitalized with cardiorespiratory failure, yet there are few effective postdischarge therapies that are relevant to their experiences. To determine the feasibility and clinical impact of two different versions of a month-long self-guided mobile app-based coping skills program called Blueprint in comparison to usual care (UC) control. Patients hospitalized with a serious cardiopulmonary diagnoses were recruited from adult intensive care units and stepdown units at a large academic medical center. Participants with elevated psychological distress symptoms just after discharge were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to Blueprint with a therapist (BP/therapist), Blueprint without a therapist (BP/no therapist), or UC control. All study procedures were conducted remotely. Blueprint is a self-guided, symptom-responsive, mobile app-based adaptive coping skills program with 4 themed weeks with different daily audio, video, and text content. Participants completed surveys via the app platform at baseline and 1 and 3 months later. The primary outcome was feasibility. Additional outcomes included the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) total score, the PTSS (Post-Traumatic Stress Scale), and a 100-point quality of life visual analog scale. Of 63 patients who consented, 45 (71%) with elevated distress were randomized to BP/therapist ( = 16 [36%]), BP/no therapist ( = 14 [31%]), and UC ( = 15 [33%]). Observed rates were similar to target feasibility benchmarks, including consented patients who were randomized (71.4%), retention (75.6%), and intervention adherence (97% with weekly use). Estimated mean differences (95% confidence intervals) at 1 month compared with baseline included: HADS total (BP/therapist, -3.8 [-6.7 to -0.6]; BP/no therapist, -4.2 [-7.6 to -0.0]; UC, -3.4 [-6.6 to 0.2]); PTSS (BP/therapist, -6.7 [-11.3 to -2.1]; BP/no therapist, -9.1 [-14.4 to -3.9]; UC, -4.2 [-10.8 to 2.3]); and quality of life (BP/therapist, -4.5 [-14.3 to 4.6]; BP/no therapist, 14.0 [-0.9 to 29.0]; UC, 8.7 [-3.5 to 20.9]). Among survivors of cardiorespiratory failure, a mobile app-based postdischarge coping skills training intervention demonstrated evidence of feasibility and clinical impact compared with UC control. A larger trial is warranted to test the efficacy of this approach. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04329702).

摘要

心理困扰症状在最近因心肺衰竭住院的患者中很常见,但针对他们的经历,很少有有效的出院后治疗方法。本研究旨在确定两种不同版本的为期一个月的自我指导的基于移动应用的应对技能计划 Blueprint 的可行性和临床影响,该计划名为 Blueprint,与常规护理 (UC) 对照。从大型学术医疗中心的成人重症监护病房和重症监护病房招募了患有严重心肺诊断的患者。在出院后出现心理困扰症状升高的患者中,按照 1:1:1 的比例随机分配到接受Blueprint 治疗师 (BP/therapist)、无治疗师的 Blueprint (BP/no therapist) 或常规护理 (UC) 对照组。所有研究程序均远程进行。Blueprint 是一种自我指导的、对症状有反应的、基于移动应用的自适应应对技能计划,有 4 个主题周,每天提供不同的音频、视频和文本内容。参与者在基线和 1 个月及 3 个月后通过应用程序平台完成调查。主要结局是可行性。其他结局包括 HADS(医院焦虑和抑郁量表)总分、PTSS(创伤后应激量表)和 100 分的生活质量视觉模拟量表。在同意的 63 名患者中,有 45 名(71%)心理困扰升高的患者被随机分配到 BP/therapist( = 16 [36%])、BP/no therapist( = 14 [31%])和 UC( = 15 [33%])。观察到的比率与目标可行性基准相似,包括同意并随机分配的患者(71.4%)、保留率(75.6%)和干预依从性(每周使用 97%)。与基线相比,1 个月时的估计平均差异(95%置信区间)包括:HADS 总分(BP/therapist,-3.8 [-6.7 至 -0.6];BP/no therapist,-4.2 [-7.6 至 -0.0];UC,-3.4 [-6.6 至 0.2]);PTSS(BP/therapist,-6.7 [-11.3 至 -2.1];BP/no therapist,-9.1 [-14.4 至 -3.9];UC,-4.2 [-10.8 至 2.3]);和生活质量(BP/therapist,-4.5 [-14.3 至 4.6];BP/no therapist,14.0 [-0.9 至 29.0];UC,8.7 [-3.5 至 20.9])。在心肺衰竭幸存者中,与常规护理对照相比,基于移动应用的出院后应对技能培训干预措施显示出可行性和临床影响的证据。需要更大规模的试验来测试这种方法的疗效。临床试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT04329702)。

相似文献

9

引用本文的文献

1
Transdiagnostic-focused apps for depression and anxiety: a meta-analysis.
NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Jul 15;8(1):443. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01860-3.
3
Digital Health Interventions Supporting Recovery for Intensive Care Patients and Their Family Members: A Scoping Review.
Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024 Nov 30;3(1):100185. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.11.006. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Beyond Functional Outcomes: Exploring Quality of Life After Critical Illness-A Qualitative Study.
Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun 1;53(6):e1190-e1201. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006665. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
6
Mobile Mindfulness for Psychological Distress and Burnout among Frontline COVID-19 Nurses: A Pilot Randomized Trial.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Oct;20(10):1475-1482. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202301-025OC.
7
Fight and Engage, or Suffer and Die?
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Jun;20(6):792-793. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202302-156ED.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinician Shortage Exacerbates Pandemic-Fueled "Mental Health Crisis".
JAMA. 2022 Jun 14;327(22):2179-2181. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.8661.
2
Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
Lancet. 2021 Nov 6;398(10312):1700-1712. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
3
SICQ Coping and the Health-Related Quality of Life and Recovery of Critically Ill ICU Patients: A Prospective Cohort Study.
Chest. 2022 Jan;161(1):130-139. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.06.033. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
7
The Patient and Family Member Experience of Financial Stress Related to Critical Illness.
J Palliat Med. 2020 Jul;23(7):972-976. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0369. Epub 2020 Jan 2.
9
Randomised controlled trial of cognitive behavioural therapy in COPD.
ERJ Open Res. 2018 Nov 23;4(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00094-2018. eCollection 2018 Oct.
10
Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Nov 2;11(11):CD012701. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012701.pub2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验