Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine.
Program to Support People and Enhance Recovery (ProSPER).
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 Jun;20(6):861-871. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202210-890OC.
Psychological distress symptoms are common among patients recently hospitalized with cardiorespiratory failure, yet there are few effective postdischarge therapies that are relevant to their experiences. To determine the feasibility and clinical impact of two different versions of a month-long self-guided mobile app-based coping skills program called Blueprint in comparison to usual care (UC) control. Patients hospitalized with a serious cardiopulmonary diagnoses were recruited from adult intensive care units and stepdown units at a large academic medical center. Participants with elevated psychological distress symptoms just after discharge were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio to Blueprint with a therapist (BP/therapist), Blueprint without a therapist (BP/no therapist), or UC control. All study procedures were conducted remotely. Blueprint is a self-guided, symptom-responsive, mobile app-based adaptive coping skills program with 4 themed weeks with different daily audio, video, and text content. Participants completed surveys via the app platform at baseline and 1 and 3 months later. The primary outcome was feasibility. Additional outcomes included the HADS (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) total score, the PTSS (Post-Traumatic Stress Scale), and a 100-point quality of life visual analog scale. Of 63 patients who consented, 45 (71%) with elevated distress were randomized to BP/therapist ( = 16 [36%]), BP/no therapist ( = 14 [31%]), and UC ( = 15 [33%]). Observed rates were similar to target feasibility benchmarks, including consented patients who were randomized (71.4%), retention (75.6%), and intervention adherence (97% with weekly use). Estimated mean differences (95% confidence intervals) at 1 month compared with baseline included: HADS total (BP/therapist, -3.8 [-6.7 to -0.6]; BP/no therapist, -4.2 [-7.6 to -0.0]; UC, -3.4 [-6.6 to 0.2]); PTSS (BP/therapist, -6.7 [-11.3 to -2.1]; BP/no therapist, -9.1 [-14.4 to -3.9]; UC, -4.2 [-10.8 to 2.3]); and quality of life (BP/therapist, -4.5 [-14.3 to 4.6]; BP/no therapist, 14.0 [-0.9 to 29.0]; UC, 8.7 [-3.5 to 20.9]). Among survivors of cardiorespiratory failure, a mobile app-based postdischarge coping skills training intervention demonstrated evidence of feasibility and clinical impact compared with UC control. A larger trial is warranted to test the efficacy of this approach. Clinical trial registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04329702).
心理困扰症状在最近因心肺衰竭住院的患者中很常见,但针对他们的经历,很少有有效的出院后治疗方法。本研究旨在确定两种不同版本的为期一个月的自我指导的基于移动应用的应对技能计划 Blueprint 的可行性和临床影响,该计划名为 Blueprint,与常规护理 (UC) 对照。从大型学术医疗中心的成人重症监护病房和重症监护病房招募了患有严重心肺诊断的患者。在出院后出现心理困扰症状升高的患者中,按照 1:1:1 的比例随机分配到接受Blueprint 治疗师 (BP/therapist)、无治疗师的 Blueprint (BP/no therapist) 或常规护理 (UC) 对照组。所有研究程序均远程进行。Blueprint 是一种自我指导的、对症状有反应的、基于移动应用的自适应应对技能计划,有 4 个主题周,每天提供不同的音频、视频和文本内容。参与者在基线和 1 个月及 3 个月后通过应用程序平台完成调查。主要结局是可行性。其他结局包括 HADS(医院焦虑和抑郁量表)总分、PTSS(创伤后应激量表)和 100 分的生活质量视觉模拟量表。在同意的 63 名患者中,有 45 名(71%)心理困扰升高的患者被随机分配到 BP/therapist( = 16 [36%])、BP/no therapist( = 14 [31%])和 UC( = 15 [33%])。观察到的比率与目标可行性基准相似,包括同意并随机分配的患者(71.4%)、保留率(75.6%)和干预依从性(每周使用 97%)。与基线相比,1 个月时的估计平均差异(95%置信区间)包括:HADS 总分(BP/therapist,-3.8 [-6.7 至 -0.6];BP/no therapist,-4.2 [-7.6 至 -0.0];UC,-3.4 [-6.6 至 0.2]);PTSS(BP/therapist,-6.7 [-11.3 至 -2.1];BP/no therapist,-9.1 [-14.4 至 -3.9];UC,-4.2 [-10.8 至 2.3]);和生活质量(BP/therapist,-4.5 [-14.3 至 4.6];BP/no therapist,14.0 [-0.9 至 29.0];UC,8.7 [-3.5 至 20.9])。在心肺衰竭幸存者中,与常规护理对照相比,基于移动应用的出院后应对技能培训干预措施显示出可行性和临床影响的证据。需要更大规模的试验来测试这种方法的疗效。临床试验在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(NCT04329702)。