• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

控制图在手术绩效监测中的应用:系统评价。

Control Charts Usage for Monitoring Performance in Surgery: A Systematic Review.

机构信息

From the Health Data Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université de Lyon 1.

Brigham and Women's Hospital-Harvard Medical School, Center for Surgery and Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2023 Mar 1;19(2):110-116. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001103. Epub 2023 Jan 6.

DOI:10.1097/PTS.0000000000001103
PMID:36603595
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The control chart is a graphical tool for data interpretation that detects aberrant variations in specific metrics, ideally leading to the identification of special causes that can be resolved. A clear assessment of control chart utilization and its potential impact in surgery is required to justify recommendations for its dissemination. This review aims to describe how performance monitoring using control charts was used over time in surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed regarding statistical process control in surgery from its inception until December 2019 was performed using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Information extracted from selected publications included study aim and population setting, monitored indicators, control charts methodological parameters, and implementation strategy.

RESULTS

One hundred thirteen studies met the selection criteria with a median of 1916 monitored patients. Overall, 57.5% of studies focused on control chart methodology, 24.8% aimed at evaluating performance changes using control charts retrospectively, and 17.7% implemented control charts for continuous quality improvement prospectively. Although there was a great diversity of used indicators and charting tools, the evaluation of patient safety (72.6%) or efficiency (15.9%) metrics based on Shewhart control chart (33.6%) or cumulative sum chart (54.9%) were common. To foster control charts implementation, 14 studies promoted their periodic review, but only three assessed their impact on patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The scientific literature supports the feasibility and utility of control chart to improve patient safety in multiple surgical settings. Additional studies are necessary to reveal the optimal manner in which to implement this affordable tool in surgical practice.

摘要

目的

控制图是一种用于数据分析的图形工具,可用于检测特定指标中的异常变化,理想情况下可以识别出可以解决的特殊原因。为了证明推广控制图使用的合理性,需要对控制图的使用情况及其在外科手术中的潜在影响进行明确评估。本综述旨在描述控制图在外科手术中的使用情况随时间的变化。

方法

根据系统综述和荟萃分析首选报告项目的指南,对从一开始到 2019 年 12 月期间在 PubMed 上发表的关于外科手术中统计过程控制的研究进行了系统搜索。从选定的出版物中提取的信息包括研究目的和人群设置、监测指标、控制图方法参数和实施策略。

结果

符合选择标准的研究有 113 项,中位数为 1916 例监测患者。总体而言,57.5%的研究关注控制图方法,24.8%旨在使用控制图回顾性评估绩效变化,17.7%前瞻性地为持续质量改进实施控制图。尽管使用的指标和图表工具种类繁多,但基于休哈特控制图(33.6%)或累积和图(54.9%)评估患者安全性(72.6%)或效率(15.9%)指标较为常见。为了促进控制图的实施,有 14 项研究促进了其定期审查,但只有三项研究评估了其对患者结局的影响。

结论

科学文献支持控制图在多种外科环境中提高患者安全性的可行性和实用性。需要进一步的研究来揭示在外科实践中实施这种经济实惠的工具的最佳方式。

相似文献

1
Control Charts Usage for Monitoring Performance in Surgery: A Systematic Review.控制图在手术绩效监测中的应用:系统评价。
J Patient Saf. 2023 Mar 1;19(2):110-116. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001103. Epub 2023 Jan 6.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Control charts in healthcare quality improvement. A systematic review on adherence to methodological criteria.医疗质量改进中的控制图。关于方法学标准依从性的系统评价。
Methods Inf Med. 2012;51(3):189-98. doi: 10.3414/ME11-01-0055. Epub 2012 Apr 5.
6
Monitoring surgical quality: the cumulative sum (CUSUM) approach.监测手术质量:累积和(CUSUM)方法。
Mediastinum. 2020 Mar 25;4:4. doi: 10.21037/med.2019.10.01. eCollection 2020.
7
A scoping review of the methodological approaches used in retrospective chart reviews to validate adverse event rates in administrative data.回顾性图表审查中用于验证行政数据中不良事件发生率的方法学方法的范围综述。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 May 10;36(2). doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzae037.
8
Comparison of control charts for monitoring clinical performance using binary data.比较使用二进制数据监测临床绩效的控制图。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2017 Nov;26(11):919-928. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005526. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
9
Application of the statistical process control method for prospective patient safety monitoring during the learning phase: robotic kidney transplantation with regional hypothermia (IDEAL phase 2a-b).统计过程控制方法在学习阶段前瞻性患者安全监测中的应用:区域低温下的机器人肾移植(IDEAL 阶段 2a-b)。
Eur Urol. 2014 Aug;66(2):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.055. Epub 2014 Mar 4.
10
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.

引用本文的文献

1
Learning curve of minimally invasive complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review.右侧结肠癌微创全结肠系膜切除术的学习曲线:一项系统评价
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12128-y.
2
Using Quality Improvement and Implementation Science to Identify Strategies That Foster Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Submissions.运用质量改进与实施科学来确定促进电子患者报告结局提交的策略。
J Healthc Qual. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1097/JHQ.0000000000000478.
3
Risk-adjusted observed minus expected cumulative sum (RA O-E CUSUM) chart for visualisation and monitoring of surgical outcomes.
用于可视化和监测手术结果的风险调整观察值减去预期累积和(RA O-E CUSUM)图表。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2025 Apr 17;34(5):330-338. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017935.
4
Comment on A Method for Continuous Surgeon Improvement in Rectal Cancer: Observed Minus Expected (O-E) Chart Versus CUSUM Chart.关于一种直肠外科医生持续改进方法的评论:观察值减去预期值(O-E)图表与累积和(CUSUM)图表
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Aug 1;5(3):e473. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000473. eCollection 2024 Sep.
5
A time-adjusted control chart for monitoring surgical outcome variations.用于监测手术结果变化的时间调整控制图。
PLoS One. 2024 May 15;19(5):e0303543. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303543. eCollection 2024.
6
Economic analysis of surgical outcome monitoring using control charts: the SHEWHART cluster randomised trial.使用控制图进行手术结果监测的经济分析:休哈特整群随机试验
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Apr 24;33(5):284-292. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015390.