Suppr超能文献

大鼠基于活动的厌食症与日程诱导的烦渴症之间的相互促进作用。

Mutual facilitation between activity-based anorexia and schedule-induced polydipsia in rats.

作者信息

Labajos María José, Calcagni Gianluca, Pellón Ricardo

机构信息

Laboratorio de Aprendizaje y Conducta Animal, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, C/ Juan del Rosal 10, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040, Madrid, Spain.

Gianluca Calcagni is at Instituto de Estructura de la Materia, CSIC, Serrano 121, 28006, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Learn Behav. 2023 Dec;51(4):502-520. doi: 10.3758/s13420-022-00560-2. Epub 2023 Jan 5.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the possible relationship between drinking (licks) in the schedule-induced polydipsia (SIP) phenomenon and running (turns in the wheel) in the activity-based anorexia (ABA) one. Within-subjects counterbalanced experiments were designed with male Wistar rats which underwent both behavioral procedures; half of them performed the ABA procedure first and the other half the SIP procedure first. In Experiment 1, the initial development of ABA facilitated the subsequent acquisition of SIP, whereas the first acquisition of SIP retarded the subsequent development of ABA. Given that SIP exposure implied food restriction, it could be that adaptation to the food regime contributed to lowering ABA manifestation. Thus, Experiment 2 was carried out in exactly the same way as Experiment 1, with the exception that animals which first went through SIP prior to undergoing the ABA procedure had no food restriction. In this case, both ABA and SIP as first experiences facilitated the further development of SIP and ABA, respectively. This suggests that running in ABA may be functionally similar to drinking in SIP; therefore, both behaviors can be thought of as induced by the schedule/regime of intermittent food availability.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在基于活动的厌食症(ABA)中,时间表诱导的多饮症(SIP)现象中的饮水(舔舐)与奔跑(轮子转动)之间可能存在的关系。对雄性Wistar大鼠进行了受试者内平衡实验,这些大鼠都经历了这两种行为程序;其中一半先进行ABA程序,另一半先进行SIP程序。在实验1中,ABA的初始发展促进了随后SIP的获得,而首次获得SIP则延缓了随后ABA的发展。鉴于接触SIP意味着食物限制,可能是对食物摄入方式的适应有助于降低ABA的表现。因此,实验2的进行方式与实验1完全相同,不同之处在于,在进行ABA程序之前先经历SIP的动物没有食物限制。在这种情况下,作为首次经历的ABA和SIP分别促进了SIP和ABA的进一步发展。这表明ABA中的奔跑在功能上可能类似于SIP中的饮水;因此,这两种行为都可以被认为是由间歇性食物供应的时间表/方式所诱导的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验