EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública da Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Laboratório para a Investigação Integrativa e Translacional em Saúde Populacional (ITR), Porto, Portugal.
Int J Equity Health. 2023 Jan 5;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12939-022-01806-1.
There is consensus that the 2008 financial and economic crisis and related austerity measures adversely impacted access to healthcare. In light of the growing debt caused by the COVID-19 crisis, it is uncertain whether a period of austerity will return.
This study aims to provide a structured overview of the impact of austerity policies in the EU-28 zone, applied in response to the Great Recession, on access to health care for the adult population, using the five access dimensions by Levesque et al. (2013).
This study followed the PRISMA extension for Scoping Reviews guideline. Medline (PubMed) and Web of Science were searched between February 2021 and June 2021. Primary studies in the English language published after the 1st of January 2008 reporting on the possible change in access to the healthcare system for the adult population induced by austerity in an EU28 country were included.
The final search strategy resulted in 525 articles, of which 75 studies were reviewed for full-text analysis, and a total of 21 studies were included. Results revealed that austerity policy has been primarily associated with a reduction in access to healthcare, described through four main categories: i) Increase in rates of reported unmet needs (86%); ii) Affordability (38%); iii) Appropriateness (38%); iv) and Availability and Accommodation (19%). Vulnerable populations were more affected by austerity measures than the general population when specific safeguards were not in place. The main affected adult vulnerable population groups were: patients with chronic diseases, elderly people, (undocumented) migrants, unemployed, economically inactive people and individuals with lower levels of education or socioeconomic status.
Austerity measures have led to a deterioration in access to healthcare in the vast majority of the countries studied in the EU-28 zone. Findings should prompt policymakers to rethink the fiscal agenda across all policies in times of economic crisis and focus on the needs of the most vulnerable populations from the health perspective.
人们普遍认为,2008 年的金融危机和相关的紧缩措施对医疗保健的可及性产生了不利影响。鉴于 COVID-19 危机造成的债务不断增加,紧缩时期是否会再次出现尚不确定。
本研究旨在通过 Levesque 等人(2013 年)提出的五个可及性维度,提供 2008 年大衰退期间在欧盟 28 区实施的紧缩政策对成年人获得医疗保健的影响的结构化概述。
本研究遵循 PRISMA 扩展的范围综述指南。在 2021 年 2 月至 2021 年 6 月期间,在 Medline(PubMed)和 Web of Science 上进行了搜索。纳入了以英文发表的、在 2008 年 1 月 1 日之后报告了由于欧盟 28 个国家的紧缩政策对成年人获得医疗保健系统的可能变化的初步研究。
最终的搜索策略产生了 525 篇文章,其中有 75 篇文章进行了全文分析,共有 21 篇文章被纳入。结果表明,紧缩政策主要与医疗保健可及性的降低有关,主要表现在四个方面:i)未满足需求的报告率增加(86%);ii)可负担性(38%);iii)适宜性(38%);iv)可用性和可容纳性(19%)。在没有具体保障措施的情况下,弱势群体受到紧缩措施的影响比一般人口更大。受影响的主要成年弱势群体包括:慢性病患者、老年人、(无证件)移民、失业者、经济上不活跃的人以及教育或社会经济地位较低的个人。
紧缩措施导致欧盟 28 区大多数国家的医疗保健可及性恶化。研究结果应促使决策者在经济危机时期重新考虑所有政策的财政议程,并从健康角度关注最弱势群体的需求。