Retired, paediatrician and public health and epidemiology specialist, Homer 22 1rst 1, Barcelona, Spain.
Centre for Health Equity Studies (CHESS), Stockholm University/Karolinska Institutet, SE-106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 19;20(1):564. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08732-3.
To analyse the impact of austerity measures taken by European governments as a response to the 2008 economic and financial crisis on social determinants on child health (SDCH), and child health outcomes (CHO).
A systematic literature review was carried out in Medline (Ovid), Embase, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and Sociological abstracts in the last 5 years from European countries. Studies aimed at analysing the Great Recession, governments' responses to the crisis, and its impact on SDCH were included. A narrative synthesis of the results was carried out. The risk of bias was assessed using the STROBE and EPICURE tools.
Fourteen studies were included, most of them with a low to intermediate risk of bias (average score 72.1%). Government responses to the crisis varied, although there was general agreement that Greece, Spain, Ireland and the United Kingdom applied higher levels of austerity. High austerity periods, compared to pre-austerity periods were associated with increased material deprivation, child poverty rates, and low birth weight. Increasing child poverty subsequent to austerity measures was associated with deterioration of child health. High austerity was also related to poorer access and quality of services provided to disabled children. An annual reduction of 1% on public health expenditure was associated to 0.5% reduction on Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccination coverage in Italy.
Countries that applied high level of austerity showed worse trends on SDCH and CHO, demonstrating the importance that economic policy may have for equity in child health and development. European governments must act urgently and reverse these austerity policy measures that are detrimental to family benefits and child protection.
分析欧洲政府为应对 2008 年经济和金融危机而采取的紧缩措施对儿童健康的社会决定因素(SDCH)和儿童健康结果(CHO)的影响。
在过去 5 年中,我们在 Medline(Ovid)、Embase、Web of Science、PsycInfo 和 Sociological abstracts 中进行了系统的文献回顾,纳入了旨在分析大衰退、政府对危机的反应及其对 SDCH 影响的研究。对结果进行了叙述性综合。使用 STROBE 和 EPICURE 工具评估偏倚风险。
共纳入 14 项研究,其中大多数研究的偏倚风险较低至中等(平均评分为 72.1%)。政府对危机的反应各不相同,尽管人们普遍认为希腊、西班牙、爱尔兰和英国实施了更高水平的紧缩措施。与紧缩前时期相比,高紧缩时期与物质匮乏、儿童贫困率和低出生体重增加有关。随后实施紧缩措施导致儿童贫困增加与儿童健康恶化有关。高紧缩还与残疾儿童获得和服务质量下降有关。意大利公共卫生支出每年减少 1%,与麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹疫苗接种覆盖率降低 0.5%有关。
实施高水平紧缩措施的国家在 SDCH 和 CHO 方面表现出更差的趋势,这表明经济政策对儿童健康和发展的公平性可能具有重要意义。欧洲政府必须紧急采取行动,扭转这些对家庭福利和儿童保护有害的紧缩政策措施。