Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Manicaland Centre for Public Health Research, Biomedical Research and Training Institute, Harare, Zimbabwe.
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Jan 6;23(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12879-022-07972-5.
Rapid diagnostic tests have revolutionized the HIV response in low resource and high HIV prevalence settings. However, disconcerting levels of misdiagnosis at the point-of-care call for research into their root causes. As rapid HIV tests are technologies that cross borders and have inscribed within them assumptions about the context of implementation, we set out to explore the (mis)match between intended and actual HIV testing practices in Zimbabwe.
We examined actual HIV testing practices through participant observations in four health facilities and interviews with 28 rapid HIV testers. As time was identified as a key sphere of influence in thematic analyses of the qualitative data, a further layer of analysis juxtaposed intended (as scripted in operating procedures) and actual HIV testing practices from a temporal perspective.
We uncover substantial discrepancies between the temporal flows assumed and inscribed into rapid HIV test kits (their intended use) and those presented by the high frequency testing and low resource and staffing realities of healthcare settings in Zimbabwe. Aside from pointing to temporal root causes of misdiagnosis, such as the premature reading of test results, our findings indicate that the rapidity of rapid diagnostic technologies is contingent on a slow, steady, and controlled environment. This not only adds a different dimension to the meaning of "rapid" HIV testing, but suggests that errors are embedded in the design of the diagnostic tests and testing strategies from the outset, by inscribing unrealistic assumptions about the context within which they used.
Temporal analyses can usefully uncover difficulties in attuning rapid diagnostic test technologies to local contexts. Such insight can help explain potential misdiagnosis 'crisis points' in point-of-care testing, and the need for public health initiatives to identify and challenge the underlying temporal root causes of misdiagnosis.
快速诊断检测技术在资源匮乏和艾滋病毒高发地区改变了艾滋病毒应对措施。然而,在护理点令人不安的误诊水平要求对其根本原因进行研究。由于快速艾滋病毒检测技术是跨越国界的技术,并且对实施背景有假设,我们着手探索津巴布韦境内预期和实际艾滋病毒检测做法之间的(不)匹配。
我们通过在四个卫生设施进行的参与者观察和对 28 名快速艾滋病毒检测人员的访谈,检查实际的艾滋病毒检测做法。由于时间被确定为对定性数据进行主题分析的一个关键影响领域,进一步的分析层面从时间角度并置了快速艾滋病毒检测试剂盒的预期(按操作程序编写)和实际检测做法。
我们发现,快速艾滋病毒检测试剂盒所假设和编写的时间流程(预期用途)与津巴布韦医疗保健环境中高频率检测和资源与人员配备的现实之间存在实质性差异。除了指出误诊的时间性根本原因,例如过早读取检测结果外,我们的研究结果表明,快速诊断技术的快速性取决于缓慢、稳定和受控制的环境。这不仅为“快速”艾滋病毒检测的含义增添了一个不同的维度,而且表明错误从一开始就嵌入了诊断测试和测试策略的设计中,因为它们对使用环境有不切实际的假设。
时间分析可以有用地揭示将快速诊断检测技术调整到当地环境的困难。这种见解可以帮助解释护理点检测中潜在的误诊“危机点”,并需要公共卫生倡议确定和挑战误诊的潜在时间性根本原因。