Bock Peter, Phiri Comfort, Piwowar-Manning Estelle, Kosloff Barry, Mandla Nomtha, Young Alicia, James Anelet, Schaap Ab, Scheepers Michelle, Donnell Deborah, Griffith Sam, El-Sadr Wafaa, Shanaube Kwame, Beyers Nulda, Hayes Richard, Fidler Sarah, Ayles Helen
Desmond Tutu TB Centre, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Stellenbosch University, Western Cape, South Africa.
Zambart, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.
J Int AIDS Soc. 2017 Aug 29;20(Suppl 6):21780. doi: 10.7448/IAS.20.7.21780.
Population-wide HIV testing services (HTS) must be delivered in order to achieve universal antiretroviral treatment (ART) coverage. To accurately deliver HTS at such scale, non-facility-based HIV point-of-care testing (HIV-POCT) is necessary but requires rigorous quality assurance (QA). This study assessed the performance of community-wide HTS in Zambia and South Africa (SA) as part of the HPTN 071 (PopART) study and explores the impact of quality improvement interventions on HTS performance.
Between 2014 and 2016, HIV-POCT was undertaken within households both as part of the randomly selected HPTN 071 research cohort (Population Cohort [PC]) and as part of the intervention provided by community HIV-care providers. HIV-POCT followed national algorithms in both countries. Consenting PC participants provided a venous blood sample in addition to being offered HIV-POCT. We compared results obtained in the PC using a laboratory-based gold standard (GS) testing algorithm and HIV-POCT. Comprehensive QA mechanisms were put in place to support the community-wide testing. Participants who were identified as having a false negative or false positive HIV rapid test were revisited and offered retesting.
We initially observed poor sensitivity (45-54%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 31-69) of HIV-POCT in the PC in SA compared to sensitivity in Zambia for the same time period of 95.8% (95% CI 93-98). In both countries, specificity of HIV-POCT was >98%. With enhanced QA interventions and adoption of the same HIV-POCT algorithm, sensitivity in SA improved to a similar level as in Zambia.
This is one of the first reports of HIV-POCT performance during wide-scale delivery of HTS compared to a GS laboratory algorithm. HIV-POCT in a real-world setting had a lower sensitivity than anticipated. Appropriate choice of HIV-POCT algorithms, intensive training and supervision, and robust QA mechanisms are necessary to optimize HIV-POCT test performance when testing is delivered at a community level. HIV-POCT in clients who did not disclose that they were on ART may have contributed to false negative HIV-POCT results and should be the topic of future research.
为实现抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)的全面覆盖,必须提供面向全体人群的艾滋病毒检测服务(HTS)。为了在如此大规模上准确提供HTS,基于非医疗机构的艾滋病毒即时检测(HIV-POCT)是必要的,但需要严格的质量保证(QA)。本研究评估了赞比亚和南非社区范围内HTS的表现,作为HPTN 071(PopART)研究的一部分,并探讨了质量改进干预措施对HTS表现的影响。
在2014年至2016年期间,HIV-POCT在家庭中进行,既是随机选择的HPTN 071研究队列(人群队列[PC])的一部分,也是社区艾滋病毒护理提供者提供的干预措施的一部分。两国的HIV-POCT均遵循国家算法。同意参与的PC参与者除了接受HIV-POCT外,还提供了静脉血样。我们使用基于实验室的金标准(GS)检测算法和HIV-POCT比较了在PC中获得的结果。建立了全面的QA机制以支持社区范围的检测。被确定为艾滋病毒快速检测假阴性或假阳性的参与者被重新检测并提供再次检测。
与赞比亚同期95.8%(95%置信区间[CI] 93-98)的敏感性相比,我们最初观察到南非PC中HIV-POCT的敏感性较差(45-54%,95%置信区间[CI] 31-69)。在两国,HIV-POCT的特异性均>98%。随着QA干预措施的加强和采用相同的HIV-POCT算法,南非的敏感性提高到与赞比亚相似的水平。
这是与GS实验室算法相比,在大规模提供HTS期间HIV-POCT表现的首批报告之一。现实环境中的HIV-POCT敏感性低于预期。当在社区层面进行检测时,适当选择HIV-POCT算法、强化培训和监督以及强大的QA机制对于优化HIV-POCT检测表现是必要的。未披露自己正在接受ART治疗的客户中的HIV-POCT可能导致了HIV-POCT假阴性结果,这应该是未来研究的主题。