• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢哌酮舒巴坦治疗复杂性尿路感染的临床经验

[Clinical experience with cefbuperazone in complicated urinary tract infection].

作者信息

Banya Y, Okamoto T, Ujiie T, Yoo T, Noro K, Niisato S, Yokota K, Aoki H, Kubo T, Ohhori T

机构信息

Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Iwate Medical University.

出版信息

Hinyokika Kiyo. 1987 May;33(5):786-93.

PMID:3661345
Abstract

Cefbuperazone (CBPZ) was administered to inpatients with complicated urinary tract infections (UTI) at our department. Clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated in 22 chronic cases by the criteria for evaluation of clinical of antimicrobial agents on urinary tract infection. Overall clinical efficacy was excellent in 8 cases, moderate in 9 cases and poor in 5 cases with an effectiveness rate of 77%. Twenty-four of the 34 strains isolated from the patients were eradicated and eradication rate was 71%. Neither subjective nor objective adverse reactions were observed. Abnormal changes in laboratory tests were found in 9 patients, but were probably not related to CBPZ administration. Judging from these results, CBPZ is considered to be an effective and safe antibacterial for the treatment of complicated UTI.

摘要

头孢哌酮(CBPZ)应用于我院患有复杂性尿路感染(UTI)的住院患者。依据抗菌药物治疗尿路感染的临床评价标准,对22例慢性病例的临床疗效和安全性进行了评估。总体临床疗效为8例优、9例中、5例差,有效率为77%。从患者分离出的34株菌株中,24株被清除,清除率为71%。未观察到主观或客观的不良反应。9例患者实验室检查有异常变化,但可能与使用CBPZ无关。根据这些结果,CBPZ被认为是治疗复杂性UTI的一种有效且安全的抗菌药物。

相似文献

1
[Clinical experience with cefbuperazone in complicated urinary tract infection].头孢哌酮舒巴坦治疗复杂性尿路感染的临床经验
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1987 May;33(5):786-93.
2
[Clinical experience of norfloxacin in urinary tract infection].诺氟沙星治疗尿路感染的临床经验
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1985 Aug;31(8):1501-17.
3
[Clinical studies of norfloxacin in urinary tract infections].
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1985 Nov;31(11):2085-9.
4
[Clinical evaluation of cefbuperazone in complicated urinary tract infection].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Dec;36(12):3343-8.
5
[Clinical experience with cefmetazole in the urological field].[头孢美唑在泌尿外科领域的临床经验]
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1983 Apr;29(4):459-63.
6
[Clinical evaluation of cefixime (CFIX) in the treatment of urinary tract infection].
Hinyokika Kiyo. 1989 Jul;35(7):1267-75.
7
[Clinical studies on effect of cefbuperazone on surgical infections].头孢哌酮对手术感染疗效的临床研究
Jpn J Antibiot. 1988 Mar;41(3):322-30.
8
[A double blind clinical trial of cefamandole and cefmetazole in complicated urinary tract infections].头孢孟多与头孢美唑治疗复杂性尿路感染的双盲临床试验
Jpn J Antibiot. 1983 Jan;36(1):129-49.
9
[Clinical experience with cefixime in urinary tract infections].头孢克肟治疗尿路感染的临床经验
Jpn J Antibiot. 1989 Dec;42(12):2540-7.
10
[Clinical study of S 6472 in urinary tract infection].
Jpn J Antibiot. 1990 Nov;43(11):1850-72.