• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

运用具身机器人技术突破问题解决的常规思维:感觉运动偶联如何限制新兴自主习惯的形式。

Using enactive robotics to think outside of the problem-solving box: How sensorimotor contingencies constrain the forms of emergent autononomous habits.

作者信息

Egbert Matthew D, Barandiaran Xabier E

机构信息

School of Computer Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

Te Ao Mārama, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Front Neurorobot. 2022 Dec 21;16:847054. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.847054. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnbot.2022.847054
PMID:36620482
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9810814/
Abstract

We suggest that the influence of biology in 'biologically inspired robotics' can be embraced at a deeper level than is typical, if we adopt an enactive approach that moves the focus of interest from how problems are solved to how problems emerge in the first place. In addition to being inspired by mechanisms found in natural systems or by evolutionary design principles directed at solving problems posited by the environment, we can take inspiration from the precarious, self-maintaining organization of living systems to investigate forms of cognition that are also precarious and self-maintaining and that thus also, like life, have their own problems that must be be addressed if they are to persist. In this vein, we use a simulation to explore precarious, self-reinforcing sensorimotor habits as a building block for a robot's behavior. Our simulations of simple robots controlled by an Iterative Deformable Sensorimotor Medium demonstrate the spontaneous emergence of different habits, their re-enactment and the organization of an ecology of habits within each agent. The form of the emergent habits is constrained by the sensory modality of the robot such that habits formed under one modality (vision) are more similar to each other than they are to habits formed under another (audition). We discuss these results in the wider context of: (a) enactive approaches to life and mind, (b) sensorimotor contingency theory, (c) adaptationist vs. structuralist explanations in biology, and (d) the limits of functionalist problem-solving approaches to (artificial) intelligence.

摘要

我们认为,如果我们采用一种生成式方法,将关注焦点从问题如何被解决转移到问题最初是如何出现的,那么在“生物启发式机器人技术”中,生物学的影响可以在比通常更深的层面上得到体现。除了受到自然系统中发现的机制或旨在解决环境提出的问题的进化设计原则的启发外,我们还可以从生命系统不稳定的、自我维持的组织中获取灵感,来研究同样不稳定且自我维持的认知形式,因此,就像生命一样,如果它们要持续存在,也有自己必须解决的问题。本着这种精神,我们使用模拟来探索不稳定的、自我强化的感觉运动习惯,将其作为机器人行为的一个构建模块。我们对由迭代可变形感觉运动介质控制的简单机器人的模拟,展示了不同习惯的自发出现、它们的重新 enactment 以及每个智能体内部习惯生态的组织。出现的习惯形式受到机器人感觉模态的限制,以至于在一种模态(视觉)下形成的习惯彼此之间比与在另一种模态(听觉)下形成的习惯更相似。我们在以下更广泛的背景下讨论这些结果:(a) 关于生命和心智的生成式方法,(b) 感觉运动偶联理论,(c) 生物学中适应主义与结构主义的解释,以及 (d) 功能主义解决问题方法对(人工)智能的局限性。 (注:“enactment”在文中可能有特定含义,这里直接保留英文未翻译,因为不太明确准确的中文对应词,可根据实际专业内容进一步确定。)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/c2e69e33d6fa/fnbot-16-847054-g0016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/24003ccac0bf/fnbot-16-847054-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/0762f64e6542/fnbot-16-847054-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/262dba1c0d1f/fnbot-16-847054-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/b5c160e68a79/fnbot-16-847054-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/2bd683d309e2/fnbot-16-847054-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/cd1d4b09183c/fnbot-16-847054-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/260b348d3dec/fnbot-16-847054-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/63b05ecc0d91/fnbot-16-847054-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/4feed3a17d8b/fnbot-16-847054-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/d02c2d7ec189/fnbot-16-847054-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/a307ad563460/fnbot-16-847054-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/d1604f6a4bae/fnbot-16-847054-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/4fbd9513ba09/fnbot-16-847054-g0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/c905e25c68e0/fnbot-16-847054-g0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/8859efcbc06d/fnbot-16-847054-g0015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/c2e69e33d6fa/fnbot-16-847054-g0016.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/24003ccac0bf/fnbot-16-847054-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/0762f64e6542/fnbot-16-847054-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/262dba1c0d1f/fnbot-16-847054-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/b5c160e68a79/fnbot-16-847054-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/2bd683d309e2/fnbot-16-847054-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/cd1d4b09183c/fnbot-16-847054-g0006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/260b348d3dec/fnbot-16-847054-g0007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/63b05ecc0d91/fnbot-16-847054-g0008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/4feed3a17d8b/fnbot-16-847054-g0009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/d02c2d7ec189/fnbot-16-847054-g0010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/a307ad563460/fnbot-16-847054-g0011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/d1604f6a4bae/fnbot-16-847054-g0012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/4fbd9513ba09/fnbot-16-847054-g0013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/c905e25c68e0/fnbot-16-847054-g0014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/8859efcbc06d/fnbot-16-847054-g0015.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d939/9810814/c2e69e33d6fa/fnbot-16-847054-g0016.jpg

相似文献

1
Using enactive robotics to think outside of the problem-solving box: How sensorimotor contingencies constrain the forms of emergent autononomous habits.运用具身机器人技术突破问题解决的常规思维:感觉运动偶联如何限制新兴自主习惯的形式。
Front Neurorobot. 2022 Dec 21;16:847054. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.847054. eCollection 2022.
2
Modeling habits as self-sustaining patterns of sensorimotor behavior.将习惯建模为感觉运动行为的自我维持模式。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Aug 8;8:590. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00590. eCollection 2014.
3
The Enactive Approach to Habits: New Concepts for the Cognitive Science of Bad Habits and Addiction.习惯的具身认知进路:关于不良习惯与成瘾的认知科学新概念
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 26;10:301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00301. eCollection 2019.
4
The Problem of Meaning: The Free Energy Principle and Artificial Agency.意义问题:自由能原理与人工智能体
Front Neurorobot. 2022 Jun 23;16:844773. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.844773. eCollection 2022.
5
Goal Oriented Behavior With a Habit-Based Adaptive Sensorimotor Map Network.基于习惯的自适应感觉运动映射网络的目标导向行为
Front Neurorobot. 2022 May 10;16:846693. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.846693. eCollection 2022.
6
Model learning for robot control: a survey.用于机器人控制的模型学习:一项综述。
Cogn Process. 2011 Nov;12(4):319-40. doi: 10.1007/s10339-011-0404-1. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
7
Levels and Norm-Development: A Phenomenological Approach to Enactive-Ecological Norms of Action and Perception.水平与规范发展:一种关于行动与感知的具身-生态规范的现象学方法。
Front Psychol. 2020 Aug 11;11:1666. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01666. eCollection 2020.
8
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
9
Robots with display screens: a robot with a more humanlike face display is perceived to have more mind and a better personality.带显示屏的机器人:具有更类人面部显示的机器人被认为具有更多的思维和更好的个性。
PLoS One. 2013 Aug 28;8(8):e72589. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072589. eCollection 2013.
10
Between living and nonliving: Young children's animacy judgments and reasoning about humanoid robots.活与非活之间:幼儿对人形机器人的能动性判断和推理。
PLoS One. 2019 Jun 28;14(6):e0216869. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216869. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
A Wetware Embodied AI? Towards an Autopoietic Organizational Approach Grounded in Synthetic Biology.一种具身湿件人工智能?迈向基于合成生物学的自创生组织方法。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2021 Sep 23;9:724023. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.724023. eCollection 2021.
2
Sensorimotor Contingencies as a Key Drive of Development: From Babies to Robots.感觉运动偶联作为发展的关键驱动力:从婴儿到机器人
Front Neurorobot. 2019 Dec 4;13:98. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2019.00098. eCollection 2019.
3
Extended Neural Metastability in an Embodied Model of Sensorimotor Coupling.
感觉运动耦合具身模型中的扩展神经亚稳定性
Front Syst Neurosci. 2016 Sep 23;10:76. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2016.00076. eCollection 2016.
4
Corrigendum: Modeling habits as self-sustaining patterns of sensorimotor behavior.勘误:将习惯建模为感觉运动行为的自我维持模式。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2015 Apr 20;9:209. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00209. eCollection 2015.
5
Modeling habits as self-sustaining patterns of sensorimotor behavior.将习惯建模为感觉运动行为的自我维持模式。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2014 Aug 8;8:590. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00590. eCollection 2014.
6
A dynamical systems account of sensorimotor contingencies.一种关于感觉运动关联的动力系统解释。
Front Psychol. 2013 May 27;4:285. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00285. eCollection 2013.
7
Norm-establishing and norm-following in autonomous agency.自主代理中的规范确立与规范遵循。
Artif Life. 2014 Winter;20(1):5-28. doi: 10.1162/ARTL_a_00094. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
8
A universal definition of life: autonomy and open-ended evolution.生命的通用定义:自主性与开放式进化。
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 2004 Jun;34(3):323-46. doi: 10.1023/b:orig.0000016440.53346.dc.
9
The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain.感知器:大脑中信息存储与组织的概率模型。
Psychol Rev. 1958 Nov;65(6):386-408. doi: 10.1037/h0042519.
10
A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.关于视觉与视觉意识的感觉运动解释。
Behav Brain Sci. 2001 Oct;24(5):939-73; discussion 973-1031. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x01000115.