Ramírez-Vizcaya Susana, Froese Tom
Philosophy of Science Graduate Program, National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Institute for Philosophical Research (IIF), National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM), Mexico City, Mexico.
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 26;10:301. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00301. eCollection 2019.
Habits are the topic of a venerable history of research that extends back to antiquity, yet they were originally disregarded by the cognitive sciences. They started to become the focus of interdisciplinary research in the 1990s, but since then there has been a stalemate between those who approach habits as a kind of bodily automatism or as a kind of mindful action. This implicit mind-body dualism is ready to be overcome with the rise of interest in embodied, embedded, extended, and enactive (4E) cognition. We review the enactive approach and highlight how it moves beyond the traditional stalemate by integrating both autonomy and sense-making into its theory of agency. It defines a habit as an adaptive, precarious, and self-sustaining network of neural, bodily, and interactive processes that generate dynamical sensorimotor patterns. Habits constitute a central source of normativity for the agent. We identify a potential shortcoming of this enactive account with respect to bad habits, since self-maintenance of a habit would always be intrinsically good. Nevertheless, this is only a problem if, following the mainstream perspective on habits, we treat habits as isolated modules. The enactive approach replaces this atomism with a view of habits as constituting an interdependent whole on whose overall viability the individual habits depend. Accordingly, we propose to define a bad habit as one whose expression, while positive for itself, significantly impairs a person's well-being by overruling the expression of other situationally relevant habits. We conclude by considering implications of this concept of bad habit for psychological and psychiatric research, particularly with respect to addiction research.
习惯是一个有着悠久研究历史的话题,可以追溯到古代,但认知科学最初却忽视了它们。在20世纪90年代,习惯开始成为跨学科研究的焦点,但从那时起,在将习惯视为一种身体自动行为或一种有意识行为的研究者之间就陷入了僵局。随着对具身、嵌入、扩展和生成(4E)认知的兴趣增加,这种隐含的身心二元论有望被克服。我们回顾了生成方法,并强调它如何通过将自主性和意义建构整合到其行动理论中,超越了传统的僵局。它将习惯定义为一种适应性的、不稳定的和自我维持的神经、身体和交互过程网络,这些过程产生动态的感觉运动模式。习惯构成了行为主体规范性的核心来源。我们指出了这种生成性解释在坏习惯方面的一个潜在缺点,因为习惯的自我维持总是内在地好的。然而,只有当我们按照关于习惯的主流观点,将习惯视为孤立的模块时,这才是一个问题。生成方法用一种将习惯视为构成一个相互依存的整体的观点取代了这种原子论,个体习惯依赖于这个整体的整体可行性。因此,我们建议将坏习惯定义为这样一种习惯,其表现虽然对自身是积极的,但通过压倒其他与情境相关的习惯的表现,会严重损害一个人的幸福感。我们通过考虑这种坏习惯概念对心理学和精神病学研究的影响来得出结论,特别是在成瘾研究方面。