Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Newmarket Academy, Newmarket, UK.
Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2024 Feb;29(1):56-69. doi: 10.1111/camh.12634. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
At least half of all young people who die by suicide have previously self-harmed and most of those who self-harm will not seek help from health services for self-harming behaviours. By default, schools, colleges and universities necessarily play a key role in identifying those who self-harm and supporting them to access help.
We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42021243692) of five databases (Medline, PsycINFO, ASSIA, ERIC and BEI) for quantitative studies evaluating interventions to reduce self-harm among students in schools, colleges and universities.
We identified six eligible studies that reported interventions. Two interventions used mindfulness-based approaches and the remaining four interventions focused on in-classroom education. Three interventions reported a significant reduction in self-harm, all three used in-classroom education. Of the six studies, one study was rated methodologically moderate, while the remaining five were weak.
In summary, the evidence base is limited in size and quality. Most current interventions to address self-harm in schools focus on training staff in awareness, with a significant gap in direct support for students.
至少有一半自杀身亡的年轻人曾有过自残行为,而大多数自残者不会寻求卫生服务来治疗自残行为。默认情况下,学校、学院和大学在识别自残者并支持他们寻求帮助方面发挥着关键作用。
我们对五个数据库(Medline、PsycINFO、ASSIA、ERIC 和 BEI)进行了系统评价(PROSPERO ID:CRD42021243692),以评估针对学校、学院和大学学生的减少自残行为的干预措施的定量研究。
我们确定了六项符合条件的研究报告了干预措施。两种干预措施使用了基于正念的方法,其余四种干预措施侧重于课堂教育。三种干预措施报告了自残行为的显著减少,这三种干预措施都使用了课堂教育。在这六项研究中,有一项研究在方法学上被评为中度,其余五项研究则较弱。
总之,证据基础在规模和质量上都很有限。目前大多数在学校解决自残问题的干预措施都侧重于提高工作人员的意识,而直接支持学生的措施则存在很大差距。