• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较采用游离桡动脉前臂皮瓣或颏下岛状瓣进行重建的舌癌患者的吞咽障碍。

Comparison of swallowing disorder in patients with tongue cancer undergoing reconstruction with either a radial forearm free flap or a submental island flap.

机构信息

Otorhinolaryngology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.

出版信息

Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Mar;28(1):125-130. doi: 10.1007/s10006-023-01137-7. Epub 2023 Jan 11.

DOI:10.1007/s10006-023-01137-7
PMID:36629975
Abstract

PURPOSE

In this study, the swallowing status of patients with tongue cancer undergone tongue reconstruction using radial forearm free flaps (RFFF) and submental flaps were compared.

METHODS

A total of 26 patients with tongue cancer undergone tongue resection were randomly treated by tongue reconstruction with either submental flap or RFFF approach. Swallowing status of the patients was investigated using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) by measurement of pharyngeal residue and penetration scales.

RESULTS

The pharyngeal residue scale in vallecula and pyriform sinus and the average of vallecula and pyriform sinus on days 10 and 30 post-operation as well as penetration scale at the same time showed no significant difference between two groups. However, the time to start oral feeding was significantly reduced in the submental group compared to the free flap group (P = 0.031). A positive Pearson correlation was found between the size of oral tongue and base of tongue resection and some of swallowing parameters.

CONCLUSION

Since there was no significant difference between submental and free flap respected to swallowing disorder, the submental flap is prior to free flap due to lower cost and hospitalization and less complication after tongue reconstruction.

摘要

目的

本研究比较了应用游离前臂桡侧皮瓣(RFFF)和颏下皮瓣进行舌再造的舌癌患者的吞咽状况。

方法

将 26 例接受舌切除术的舌癌患者随机分为颏下皮瓣组或 RFFF 组进行舌再造。采用纤维内镜吞咽评估(FEES)测量咽部残留和渗透量表来评估患者的吞咽状况。

结果

术后第 10 天和第 30 天的 vallecula 和梨状窦咽部残留量表以及 vallecula 和梨状窦的平均咽部残留量表以及同一时间的渗透量表在两组间无显著差异。然而,与游离皮瓣组相比,颏下组开始口服喂养的时间显著缩短(P = 0.031)。舌体和舌根切除的大小与某些吞咽参数之间存在正皮尔逊相关关系。

结论

由于颏下皮瓣和游离皮瓣在吞咽障碍方面没有显著差异,因此由于成本和住院费用较低,并发症较少,颏下皮瓣优先于游离皮瓣用于舌再造。

相似文献

1
Comparison of swallowing disorder in patients with tongue cancer undergoing reconstruction with either a radial forearm free flap or a submental island flap.比较采用游离桡动脉前臂皮瓣或颏下岛状瓣进行重建的舌癌患者的吞咽障碍。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Mar;28(1):125-130. doi: 10.1007/s10006-023-01137-7. Epub 2023 Jan 11.
2
Submental island flap versus radial forearm free flap for oral tongue reconstruction: a comparison of complications and functional outcomes.颏下岛状皮瓣与桡侧前臂游离皮瓣用于口腔舌重建的比较:并发症及功能结果对比
J Laryngol Otol. 2019 May;133(5):413-418. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119000744. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
3
[Assessment of life quality of for patients after tongue reconstruction with radial forearm free flap, anterolateral thigh perforator flap or submental island flap].[前臂桡侧游离皮瓣、股前外侧穿支皮瓣或颏下岛状皮瓣舌重建术后患者生活质量评估]
Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2017 Feb;26(1):111-114.
4
Submental island pedicled flap vs radial forearm free flap for oral reconstruction: comparison of outcomes.颏下岛状带蒂皮瓣与桡侧前臂游离皮瓣用于口腔重建:效果比较
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jan;137(1):82-7. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2010.204.
5
Submental island flap versus supraclavicular island flap in oral tongue cancer reconstruction: Perioperative and functional outcomes.口腔舌癌重建中颏下岛状皮瓣与锁骨上岛状皮瓣的比较:围手术期及功能结果
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2024 Oct;125(5):101789. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2024.101789. Epub 2024 Jan 26.
6
Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis.与桡侧前臂游离皮瓣重建相比,颏下岛状皮瓣重建降低了口腔癌重建的成本:病例系列及成本分析。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Feb 5;45:11. doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0124-8.
7
Submental flap for reconstructing tongue defect with V-Y advancement flap for repairing submental defect.颏下皮瓣用于重建舌缺损,V-Y推进皮瓣用于修复颏下缺损。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009 Aug;141(2):202-6. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2009.04.011.
8
Pedicled Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap Versus Free Radial Forearm Flap for Tongue Reconstruction Following Hemiglossectomy.带蒂锁骨下动脉岛状皮瓣与游离桡动脉前臂皮瓣用于半舌切除术后舌重建的比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Sep;26(6):e527-30. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002031.
9
Evaluation of swallowing function after intraoral soft tissue reconstruction with microvascular free flaps.应用游离微血管皮瓣进行口腔内软组织重建后吞咽功能的评估
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003 Dec;32(6):593-9. doi: 10.1054/ijom.2002.0436.
10
Comparison of Clinical Results and Quality-of-Life in Tongue Cancer Patients Undergoing Submental Island Flap and Radial Forearm Free Flap Reconstruction.接受颏下岛状皮瓣和游离桡侧前臂皮瓣重建的舌癌患者的临床结果与生活质量比较
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Sep;78(9):1639-1644. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2020.04.045. Epub 2020 May 8.

引用本文的文献

1
GenAI synthesis of histopathological images from Raman imaging for intraoperative tongue squamous cell carcinoma assessment.用于术中舌鳞状细胞癌评估的基于拉曼成像的组织病理学图像的生成式人工智能合成
Int J Oral Sci. 2025 Jan 26;17(1):12. doi: 10.1038/s41368-025-00346-y.
2
Intraoperative rapid assessment of the deep muscle surgical margin of tongue squamous cell carcinoma via Raman spectroscopy.通过拉曼光谱术对舌鳞状细胞癌深层肌肉手术切缘进行术中快速评估。
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Oct 8;12:1480279. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1480279. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative Analysis of Radial Forearm Free Flap and Anterolateral Thigh Flap in Tongue Reconstruction after Radical Resection of Tongue Cancer.舌癌根治术后前臂桡侧游离皮瓣与股前外侧皮瓣舌重建的对比分析
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 2019;81(5-6):252-264. doi: 10.1159/000502151. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
2
Submental Island Flap versus Free Flap Reconstruction for Complex Head and Neck Defects.颏下岛状瓣与游离皮瓣修复头颈部复杂缺损的比较
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Dec;161(6):946-953. doi: 10.1177/0194599819875416. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
3
What is the oncologic safety of using the submental flap to reconstruct oral cavity cancer defects?
使用颏下皮瓣重建口腔癌缺损的肿瘤学安全性如何?
Laryngoscope. 2019 Nov;129(11):2443-2444. doi: 10.1002/lary.28193. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
4
Submental island flap versus radial forearm free flap for oral tongue reconstruction: a comparison of complications and functional outcomes.颏下岛状皮瓣与桡侧前臂游离皮瓣用于口腔舌重建的比较:并发症及功能结果对比
J Laryngol Otol. 2019 May;133(5):413-418. doi: 10.1017/S0022215119000744. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
5
Free versus pedicled flaps for reconstruction of head and neck cancer defects: a systematic review.游离皮瓣与带蒂皮瓣在头颈部癌缺损重建中的比较:系统评价。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019 Mar 14;48(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s40463-019-0334-y.
6
Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Oral Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery.口腔癌外科治疗指南:韩国甲状腺-头颈外科学会
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2019 May;12(2):107-144. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2018.01816. Epub 2019 Feb 2.
7
Modified pectoralis major myocutaneous flap for the total glossectomy defects: Effect on quality of life.改良胸大肌肌皮瓣修复全舌切除术后缺损:对生活质量的影响。
J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul;114(1):32-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.24260. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
8
Submental island flap reconstruction reduces cost in oral cancer reconstruction compared to radial forearm free flap reconstruction: a case series and cost analysis.与桡侧前臂游离皮瓣重建相比,颏下岛状皮瓣重建降低了口腔癌重建的成本:病例系列及成本分析。
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Feb 5;45:11. doi: 10.1186/s40463-016-0124-8.
9
Observers' Agreement on Measurements in Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing.吞咽功能纤维内镜评估中测量结果的观察者间一致性
Dysphagia. 2016 Apr;31(2):180-7. doi: 10.1007/s00455-015-9673-7. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
10
Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scales Based on Fiberoptic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing: A Systematic Review.基于吞咽功能纤维内镜评估的咽残留严重程度评定量表:一项系统评价
Dysphagia. 2016 Jun;31(3):352-9. doi: 10.1007/s00455-015-9682-6. Epub 2016 Jan 11.