Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Center for Sexuality and Health Disparities, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;23(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-14905-z.
BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic continues to have high caseloads in the US, with vaccines a critical component of the response. Disparities in COVID-19 morbidity and mortality have been identified across states and racial/ethnic groups, which are likely in part due to disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake. This study aims to better understand and contextualize COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among persons from under-represented racial/ethnic populations in the Southern US. METHODS: We conducted 29 in-depth interviews with a sample of households in Atlanta, GA that were selected from an address-based sampling frame. We purposively approached households, from February 6 to June 27, 2021, that declined participation in a national COVID-19 serosurvey to gain perspectives of people who are often under-represented in research. Interviews were conducted in-person or over phone calls for participants with that preference. Thematic analysis was used to identify barriers and facilitators of COVID-19 vaccination, and to contextualize drivers of vaccine hesitancy. RESULTS: Decision-making about vaccination was described as dynamic, and was compared to the feeling of being on a roller coaster. The predominant reported sources of information were mass media and social media. Facilitators of vaccination included altruism, positive communication from trusted community members and workplace colleagues, and local vaccine provision sites. Driving reasons for vaccine hesitancy included limited trust in the government and concerns about COVID-19 vaccine safety, which one participant compared to jumping off a cliff without a tested rope. Among a subset of participants, beliefs regarding perceived intent to harm the Black community were prevalent. Opportunities to optimally address vaccine hesitancy included countering negative social media messages with positive messaging that matches the community's vivid ways of discussing vaccines, collaborating with community stakeholders on vaccine promotion efforts, and offering workplace-based vaccine promotion efforts. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents data that indicate it may be optimal to more broadly define 'community' in COVID-19 vaccine promotion efforts to include social media and workplace venues. To optimize vaccine and vaccine booster uptake and equity, public health must address historic racism and other concerns by using outreach that is grounded in communities.
背景:新冠疫情在美国仍有大量病例,疫苗是应对疫情的关键组成部分。各州和种族/族裔群体之间已经确定了新冠发病率和死亡率的差异,这可能部分归因于新冠疫苗接种率的差异。本研究旨在更好地了解和理解美国南部代表性不足的种族/族裔人群对新冠疫苗的犹豫。
方法:我们对亚特兰大的一组家庭进行了 29 次深入访谈,这些家庭是从基于地址的抽样框架中选择的。我们从 2021 年 2 月 6 日至 6 月 27 日,有意接近那些拒绝参加全国新冠血清调查的家庭,以了解那些在研究中经常代表性不足的人的观点。对于有此偏好的参与者,我们通过亲自或电话进行访谈。使用主题分析来确定新冠疫苗接种的障碍和促进因素,并将疫苗犹豫的驱动因素置于上下文中。
结果:接种疫苗的决策被描述为动态的,并且与过山车的感觉相比较。主要的信息来源是大众媒体和社交媒体。接种疫苗的促进因素包括利他主义、来自受信任的社区成员和工作场所同事的积极沟通,以及当地的疫苗接种点。疫苗犹豫的主要原因包括对政府的信任有限以及对新冠疫苗安全性的担忧,其中一位参与者将其比作没有经过测试的绳索就跳下悬崖。在一部分参与者中,认为存在伤害黑人社区的意图的信念很普遍。优化疫苗犹豫的机会包括用与社区生动讨论疫苗的方式相匹配的积极信息来对抗负面的社交媒体信息,与社区利益相关者合作进行疫苗推广,以及提供基于工作场所的疫苗推广。
结论:本研究提供的数据表明,在新冠疫苗推广工作中,更广泛地定义“社区”以包括社交媒体和工作场所场所可能是最佳选择。为了优化疫苗和疫苗加强针的接种率和公平性,公共卫生必须通过基于社区的外展来解决历史上的种族主义和其他问题。
Front Public Health. 2022
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2023-8
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2025-3-17
JAMA Netw Open. 2025-1-2
Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2024-12-7
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024-10
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2024-8
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2023-12
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022-7
Vaccines (Basel). 2022-2-14
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022-12
Health Educ Behav. 2021-12
Clin Transl Sci. 2021-11