Dueweke Aubrey R, Tolliver Matthew, Archer Allen, Polaha Jodi
Department of Psychology, East Tennessee State University.
Department of Pediatrics, Quillen College of Medicine, East Tennessee State University.
Fam Syst Health. 2023 Sep;41(3):366-376. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000778. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
The primary care behavioral health (PCBH) model of integration has been widely implemented across a number of noteworthy health care systems. However, lack of consistent measurement and reporting of the degree to which the PCBH model has been implemented as developers intended has resulted in two disadvantages in the field. First, clinical quality improvement efforts are hampered by lack of clear guidance on what elements are central to PCBH implementation. Second, the dearth of empirical studies reporting model fidelity impedes cross-study comparisons and limits the rigor of PCBH-focused research. Efforts to expand measurement of PCBH model fidelity would benefit from identification of accessible, unbiased metrics that could complement existing self-report measures.
In this article, we describe how we partnered with our clinical informatics team to incorporate PCBH fidelity metrics into the electronic medical record (EMR), allowing for monthly extraction and review of these data.
Next, we describe how we have used monthly fidelity monitoring to inform clinical quality improvement efforts in the context of a developing integrated care program and provide an example of how PCBH fidelity data might be reported in a research article.
Leveraging EMR data to support PCBH fidelity measurement has the potential to strengthen clinical quality improvement efforts and enable more consistent measurement and reporting of PCBH fidelity data in research. Future efforts should aim to parse out the relative contribution of different variables to the success of PCBH integration and evaluate the effectiveness of implementation strategies at supporting high fidelity. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).
初级保健行为健康(PCBH)整合模式已在许多值得关注的医疗保健系统中广泛实施。然而,对于PCBH模式是否按照开发者预期的程度进行实施,缺乏一致的衡量和报告,这给该领域带来了两个不利之处。首先,由于缺乏关于PCBH实施核心要素的明确指导,临床质量改进工作受到阻碍。其次,缺乏报告模式保真度的实证研究,这妨碍了跨研究比较,并限制了以PCBH为重点的研究的严谨性。扩大PCBH模式保真度测量的努力将受益于确定可获取、无偏差的指标,这些指标可以补充现有的自我报告措施。
在本文中,我们描述了我们如何与临床信息学团队合作,将PCBH保真度指标纳入电子病历(EMR),以便每月提取和审查这些数据。
接下来,我们描述了我们如何在一个正在发展的综合护理项目的背景下,利用每月的保真度监测为临床质量改进工作提供信息,并提供一个在研究文章中报告PCBH保真度数据的示例。
利用电子病历数据来支持PCBH保真度测量,有可能加强临床质量改进工作,并在研究中实现对PCBH保真度数据更一致的测量和报告。未来的努力应旨在剖析不同变量对PCBH整合成功的相对贡献,并评估实施策略在支持高保真度方面的有效性。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2023美国心理学会,保留所有权利)