School of Education, Communication and Society, King's College London, London, UK.
Department of Psychology and Counselling, Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-20. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12618. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
This article introduces the special issue 'Towards a Social Psychology of Precarity' that develops an orienting lens for social psychologists' engagement with the concept. As guest editors of the special issue, we provide a thematic overview of how 'precarity' is being conceptualized throughout the social sciences, before distilling the nine contributions to the special issue. In so doing, we trace the ways in which social psychologists are (dis)engaging with the concept of precarity, yet too, explore how precarity constitutes, and is embedded within, the discipline itself. Resisting disciplinary decadence, we collectively explore what a social psychology of precarity could be, and view working with/in precarity as fundamental to addressing broader calls for the social responsiveness of the discipline. The contributing papers, which are methodologically pluralistic and provide rich conceptualisations of precarity, challenge reductionist individualist understandings of suffering and coping and extend social science theorizations on precarity. They also highlight the ways in which social psychology remains complicit in perpetuating different forms of precarity, for both communities and academics. We propose future directions for the social psychological study of precarity through four reflexive questions that we encourage scholars to engage with so that we may both work with/in, and intervene against, 'the precarious'.
本文介绍了特刊“走向脆弱性的社会心理学”,该特刊为社会心理学家参与这一概念提供了一个导向视角。作为特刊的客座编辑,我们概述了“脆弱性”在整个社会科学中是如何被概念化的,然后提炼了特刊的九篇文章。在这样做的过程中,我们追溯了社会心理学家(不)参与脆弱性概念的方式,但也探讨了脆弱性如何构成并嵌入学科本身。我们抵制学科衰落,共同探索脆弱性的社会心理学可能是什么,并将在脆弱性中工作视为满足学科对社会响应性的更广泛呼吁的基础。这些投稿文章方法多样,对脆弱性进行了丰富的概念化,挑战了对苦难和应对的还原论个人主义理解,并扩展了关于脆弱性的社会科学理论。它们还强调了社会心理学在使不同形式的脆弱性永久化方面仍然是同谋,无论是对社区还是对学术界。我们通过四个反思性问题提出了未来社会心理学研究脆弱性的方向,我们鼓励学者们参与这些问题,以便我们可以在“脆弱性”中工作/干预,也可以反对“脆弱性”。