• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在这个脆弱的星球上没有边界:引入四种社会心理不稳定性的外行人模型,以支持全球人类认同和公民身份。

No borders on a fragile planet: Introducing four lay models of social psychological precarity to support global human identification and citizenship.

机构信息

The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK.

De Montfort University, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):160-179. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12605. Epub 2022 Dec 12.

DOI:10.1111/bjso.12605
PMID:36504159
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10107308/
Abstract

Measures such as Identification with all humanity (IWAH) and global identification and citizenship (GHIC) are positivity correlated with measures of humanitarianism, cosmopolitanism and environmental concern. Research using these measures suggests that most citizens have low-global identification scores. This article sheds light on this finding by investigating how global identification relates to precarity and migration (neither of which are measured in the IWAH/GHIC). The study conducted in England, Scotland and Sweden introduces a qualitative dialogical approach to GHIC. This involves measuring migration-mobility in dialogical interviews and controlling and removing borders on world maps-using an interactive world mapping task (N = 23). Participants articulate four social representations relating to a fragile earth, enduring colonial settler/native conflict, ingroup/outgroup conflict or, in contrast, a cooperative plentiful planet where borders are unnecessary. Such social representations demonstrate the importance of planetary consciousness and relate to four lay models of social psychological precarity related to intergroup competition, global conflict, economic rationality and human-made borders. In conclusion, all participants employ lay models of social psychological precarity when discussing sovereignty, migration and belonging. We recommend psychologists investigating GHIC include measures of social psychological precarity and migration-mobility.

摘要

诸如全人类认同(IWAH)和全球认同与公民身份(GHIC)等措施与人道主义、世界主义和环境关注的衡量标准呈正相关。使用这些措施的研究表明,大多数公民的全球认同感得分较低。本文通过研究全球认同与脆弱性和移民的关系(IWAH/GHIC 均未衡量这两者),揭示了这一发现。这项在英格兰、苏格兰和瑞典进行的研究采用了一种定性对话方法来衡量 GHIC。这涉及在对话访谈中衡量移民流动性,并使用交互式世界地图任务控制和消除世界地图上的边界(N=23)。参与者在与脆弱地球、持久的殖民定居者/本地冲突、内群体/外群体冲突相关的社会代表性,或者相反,合作丰富的星球上,用合作丰富的星球来表达四个社会代表性,在这个星球上,边界是不必要的。这些社会代表性表明了行星意识的重要性,并与与群体间竞争、全球冲突、经济理性和人为边界相关的四种社会心理学脆弱性的朴素模型有关。总之,所有参与者在讨论主权、移民和归属感时都采用了社会心理学脆弱性的朴素模型。我们建议研究 GHIC 的心理学家包括社会心理学脆弱性和移民流动性的衡量标准。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d45/10107308/ceeca1716831/BJSO-62-160-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d45/10107308/026f04c829ae/BJSO-62-160-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d45/10107308/8b38c8666850/BJSO-62-160-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d45/10107308/4702071e3bb1/BJSO-62-160-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d45/10107308/0a3c16feaf2c/BJSO-62-160-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d45/10107308/ceeca1716831/BJSO-62-160-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d45/10107308/026f04c829ae/BJSO-62-160-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d45/10107308/8b38c8666850/BJSO-62-160-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d45/10107308/4702071e3bb1/BJSO-62-160-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d45/10107308/0a3c16feaf2c/BJSO-62-160-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d45/10107308/ceeca1716831/BJSO-62-160-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
No borders on a fragile planet: Introducing four lay models of social psychological precarity to support global human identification and citizenship.在这个脆弱的星球上没有边界:引入四种社会心理不稳定性的外行人模型,以支持全球人类认同和公民身份。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):160-179. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12605. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
2
All humanity is my ingroup: a measure and studies of identification with all humanity.全人类是我的内群体:对认同全人类的衡量和研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):830-53. doi: 10.1037/a0028724. Epub 2012 Jun 18.
3
Global health engagement in the Scottish health service: A journey towards global citizenship.全球健康融入苏格兰医疗服务:迈向全球公民之路。
Surgeon. 2022 Feb;20(1):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.11.004. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
4
Perceived parenting and identification with all humanity: Insights from England and Germany.感知到的养育方式与对全人类的认同:来自英国和德国的见解。
Front Psychol. 2022 Aug 3;13:924562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.924562. eCollection 2022.
5
A model of global citizenship: antecedents and outcomes.全球化公民模型:前因与结果。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(5):858-70. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.701749. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
6
No one is an island: Awe encourages global citizenship identification.没有人是一座孤岛:敬畏之心能激发全球公民身份认同。
Emotion. 2023 Apr;23(3):601-612. doi: 10.1037/emo0001160. Epub 2022 Sep 8.
7
Unpacking all-inclusive superordinate categories: Comparing correlates and consequences of global citizenship and human identities.剖析全包式上位类别:比较全球公民身份和人类身份的相关因素及后果。
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:986075. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.986075. eCollection 2022.
8
Towards a social psychology of precarity.迈向脆弱性的社会心理学。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-20. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12618. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
9
[Evaluation of a citizenship-oriented intervention: The Citizens' Project of the University of Recovery].[一项以公民身份为导向的干预措施评估:康复大学公民项目]
Sante Ment Que. 2017 Spring;42(1):205-222.
10
Pandemic, precarity and health of migrants in South Asia: Mapping multiple dimensions of precarity and pathways to states of health and well-being.南亚移民的大流行、不稳定与健康:描绘不稳定的多维度以及通往健康和幸福状态的途径。
J Migr Health. 2023 Mar 20;7:100180. doi: 10.1016/j.jmh.2023.100180. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a social psychology of precarity.迈向脆弱性的社会心理学。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-20. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12618. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
2
Prec(ar)ious knowledge and the neoliberal academy: Towards re-imagining epistemic justice and critical psychology.珍贵的知识与新自由主义的学术圈:重新想象认识论公正与批判心理学。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):180-193. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12617. Epub 2022 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Towards a social psychology of precarity.迈向脆弱性的社会心理学。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):1-20. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12618. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
2
On the precariousness of address: What narratives of being called White can tell us about researching and re/producing social categories in research.论称谓的不确定性:被称为“白人”的叙述能让我们了解研究中社会类别之研究与再/生产情况。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62 Suppl 1:56-70. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12615. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3
Precarious engagements and the politics of knowledge production: Listening to calls for reorienting hegemonic social psychology.
不稳定的约定和知识生产的政治:倾听重新定位霸权社会心理学的呼吁。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2023 Jan;62 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):71-94. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12609. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
4
"Like a tsunami coming in fast": A critical qualitative study of precarity and resistance during the pandemic.“如海啸般汹涌而来”:疫情期间脆弱性与抵抗的批判性定性研究。
J Couns Psychol. 2022 Oct;69(5):565-577. doi: 10.1037/cou0000615. Epub 2022 Apr 14.
5
Against 'immigrant integration': for an end to neocolonial knowledge production.反对“移民融合”:终结新殖民知识生产。
Comp Migr Stud. 2018;6(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s40878-018-0095-1. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
6
A model of global citizenship: antecedents and outcomes.全球化公民模型:前因与结果。
Int J Psychol. 2013;48(5):858-70. doi: 10.1080/00207594.2012.701749. Epub 2012 Jul 17.
7
All humanity is my ingroup: a measure and studies of identification with all humanity.全人类是我的内群体:对认同全人类的衡量和研究。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Nov;103(5):830-53. doi: 10.1037/a0028724. Epub 2012 Jun 18.