Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2023 Mar 1;244:109767. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2023.109767. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
A low-nicotine product standard is currently under consideration by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This standard may be more effective if alternative, non-combusted sources of nicotine are concurrently available. This qualitative study explored the lived experiences of people with depression and anxiety disorders who used very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes with or without e-cigarettes during a randomized controlled trial.
We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with participants (n = 20) as they completed a 16-week blinded trial of VLNC cigarettes with or without electronic cigarettes. Interviews explored 1) experiences with these products, 2) social and environmental contexts for use and 3) relative risk perceptions. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using a hybrid inductive and deductive thematic analysis.
Concurrent access to e-cigarettes helped to ease the transition from usual-brand cigarettes to VLNC cigarettes. Some participants held misperceptions that VLNC cigarettes could reduce cancer risk whereas others did not. Participants expressed skepticism about the safety of e-cigarettes and the authenticity of the VLNC cigarettes. Smoking restrictions influenced e-cigarette use in some instances, but product preference was the overriding factor that influenced use. Participants did not note effects on psychiatric symptoms.
Should a nicotine reduction policy be implemented with e-cigarettes concurrently available on the market, tailored messaging for people with anxiety and depression disorders may be necessary to educate people about and the availability of alternative sources of nicotine, such as e-cigarettes, as well as the relative risk of VLNC cigarettes and e-cigarettes.
美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)正在考虑制定低尼古丁产品标准。如果同时提供替代的非燃烧尼古丁来源,该标准可能会更有效。本定性研究探讨了在一项随机对照试验中使用极低尼古丁含量(VLNC)香烟(有或没有电子烟)的抑郁和焦虑障碍患者的生活体验。
我们对 20 名参与者进行了半结构化定性访谈,这些参与者在完成 VLNC 香烟(有或没有电子烟)的 16 周盲法试验时接受了访谈。访谈探讨了 1)对这些产品的体验,2)使用的社会和环境背景,3)相对风险认知。访谈转录并使用混合归纳和演绎主题分析进行分析。
同时获得电子烟有助于从惯用品牌香烟过渡到 VLNC 香烟。一些参与者错误地认为 VLNC 香烟可以降低癌症风险,而另一些参与者则没有。参与者对电子烟的安全性和 VLNC 香烟的真实性表示怀疑。在某些情况下,吸烟限制会影响电子烟的使用,但产品偏好是影响使用的主要因素。参与者没有注意到对精神症状的影响。
如果实施尼古丁减少政策,同时电子烟也在市场上供应,可能需要针对焦虑和抑郁障碍患者制定有针对性的信息,以教育人们了解替代尼古丁来源(如电子烟)的可用性,以及 VLNC 香烟和电子烟的相对风险。