• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据FASTTRACK冠状动脉搭桥术研究中2020年SYNTAX评分II评估血运重建方式的适宜性:患者选择的中期报告

Appropriateness of the Modality of Revascularization According to the SYNTAX Score II 2020 in the FASTTRACK CABG Study: An Interim Report on Patient Selection.

作者信息

Ninomiya Kai, Serruys Patrick W, Garg Scot, Masuda Shinichiro, Kageyama Shigetaka, Kotoku Nozomi, Morel Marie Angele, Taylor Charles, Puskas John D, Narula Jagat, Schneider Ulrich, Doenst Torsten, Tanaka Kaoru, De Mey Johan, La Meir Mark, Mushtaq Saima, Bartorelli Antonio L, Pompilio Giulio, Andreini Daniele, Onuma Yoshinobu

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland.

Department of Cardiology, National University of Ireland, Galway (NUIG), Galway, Ireland; Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 May;50:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.carrev.2023.01.001
PMID:36639338
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Personalized long term vital prognosis plays a key role in deciding between percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and CABG in patients with complex coronary artery disease. The FASTTRACK CABG trial enrolls patients with the sole guidance of coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA) and fractional flow reserve CCTA (FFR). The feasibility/non-feasibility of this approach is determined by the surgeon request to have access to the invasive coronary angiography.

METHODS

This interim analysis, which was requested by the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB), compared the treatment decision of the "on site" Heart team to the recommended treatment as per the SYNTAX Score II 2020 (SS-2020), which was prospectively assessed by the central core laboratory in the first 57 consecutive patients (half of the planned population) enrolled in this First in Man study.

RESULTS

The average anatomical SYTAX Score is 35.6 ± 11.5. The SS-2020 predicted 5-year MACE and 10-year all-cause mortality are 14.7 % and 21.6 % following CABG, and 23.0 % and 30.4 % following PCI. Among the enrolled patients the SS-2020 predicts long-term PCI outcomes similar to CABG (absolute risk difference ≤0 % in favor of PCI) in only two patients whilst the remaining 55 patients had a predicted survival benefit with CABG.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the SS-2020, the first 57 patients recruited into the FASTTRACK CABG trial received the appropriate modality of revascularization and the DSMB allowed the investigators to complete the study.

摘要

背景

在复杂冠状动脉疾病患者中,个性化的长期生存预后在决定采用经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)还是冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)方面起着关键作用。FASTTRACK CABG试验仅在冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CCTA)和冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影血流储备分数(FFR CCTA)的指导下纳入患者。这种方法的可行性/不可行性取决于外科医生对侵入性冠状动脉造影的需求。

方法

本次中期分析由数据与安全监测委员会(DSMB)要求进行,将“现场”心脏团队的治疗决策与根据2020年SYNTAX评分II(SS - 2020)推荐的治疗方法进行比较,该评分由中央核心实验室对这项人体首例研究中连续纳入的前57名患者(计划入组人群的一半)进行前瞻性评估。

结果

平均解剖学SYTAX评分为35.6 ± 11.5。SS - 2020预测CABG后5年主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和10年全因死亡率分别为14.7%和21.6%,PCI后分别为23.0%和30.4%。在纳入的患者中,SS - 2020仅预测两名患者的长期PCI结果与CABG相似(有利于PCI的绝对风险差异≤0%),而其余55名患者预测CABG有生存获益。

结论

根据SS - 2020,FASTTRACK CABG试验招募的前57名患者接受了适当的血运重建方式,DSMB允许研究人员完成该研究。

相似文献

1
Appropriateness of the Modality of Revascularization According to the SYNTAX Score II 2020 in the FASTTRACK CABG Study: An Interim Report on Patient Selection.根据FASTTRACK冠状动脉搭桥术研究中2020年SYNTAX评分II评估血运重建方式的适宜性:患者选择的中期报告
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 May;50:34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.01.001. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
2
Safety and feasibility evaluation of planning and execution of surgical revascularisation solely based on coronary CTA and FFR in patients with complex coronary artery disease: study protocol of the FASTTRACK CABG study.基于冠状动脉 CTA 和 FFR 对复杂冠状动脉疾病患者行单纯计划性和执行性血管重建术的安全性和可行性评估:FASTTRACK CABG 研究的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 10;10(12):e038152. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038152.
3
Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization According to the SYNTAX Score.左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建术根据 SYNTAX 评分。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep;12(9):e008007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.008007. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
4
Risk stratification in 3-vessel coronary artery disease: Applying the SYNTAX Score II in the Heart Team Discussion of the SYNTAX II trial.三支血管冠状动脉疾病的风险分层:在SYNTAX II试验的心脏团队讨论中应用SYNTAX评分II
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Nov 15;86(6):E229-38. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25907. Epub 2015 May 6.
5
Treatment recommendation based on SYNTAX score 2020 derived from coronary computed tomography angiography and invasive coronary angiography.基于冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影和有创冠状动脉造影得出的 2020 版 SYNTAX 评分的治疗推荐。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2023 Sep;39(9):1795-1804. doi: 10.1007/s10554-023-02884-0. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
6
Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve Derived From Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography on Heart Team Treatment Decision-Making in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the SYNTAX III REVOLUTION Trial.基于冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影的血流储备分数对多支冠状动脉疾病患者心脏团队治疗决策的影响:来自 SYNTAX III REVOLUTION 试验的见解。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Dec;12(12):e007607. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.007607. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
7
Impact of SYNTAX Score on 10-Year Outcomes After Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.SYNTAX 评分对左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建后 10 年结局的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Feb 10;13(3):361-371. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2019.10.020.
8
The Utility of the SYNTAX Score II and SYNTAX Score 2020 for Identifying Patients with Three-Vessel Disease Eligible for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Multivessel TALENT Trial: A Prospective Pilot Experience.SYNTAX评分II和2020年SYNTAX评分在多支血管TALENT试验中识别适合经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的三支血管疾病患者的效用:一项前瞻性试点经验
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 8;23(4):133. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2304133. eCollection 2022 Apr.
9
Validity of SYNTAX score II for risk stratification of percutaneous coronary interventions: A patient-level pooled analysis of 5,433 patients enrolled in contemporary coronary stent trials.SYNTAX评分II在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗风险分层中的有效性:对当代冠状动脉支架试验中纳入的5433例患者的个体水平汇总分析。
Int J Cardiol. 2015;187:111-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.03.248. Epub 2015 Mar 18.
10
Redevelopment and validation of the SYNTAX score II to individualise decision making between percutaneous and surgical revascularisation in patients with complex coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAXES trial with external cohort validation.SYNTAX 评分 II 的再开发和验证:用于指导复杂冠状动脉疾病患者经皮与手术血运重建策略的个体化选择:多中心随机对照 SYNTAXES 试验的二次分析及外部队列验证。
Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1399-1412. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32114-0. Epub 2020 Oct 8.