• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我捕捉方法测量元意识下的心流:系统综述。

Self-caught methodologies for measuring mind wandering with meta-awareness: A systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.

Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK.

出版信息

Conscious Cogn. 2023 Feb;108:103463. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103463. Epub 2023 Jan 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.concog.2022.103463
PMID:36640586
Abstract

Mind wandering, also known as task-unrelated thought, refers to the drift of attention from a focal task or train of thought. Because self-caught measures of mind wandering require participants to spontaneously indicate when they notice their attention drift, self-caught methodologies provide a way to measure mind wandering with meta-awareness. Given the proposed role of meta-awareness in mental health and psychological interventions, an overview of existing self-caught methodologies would help clinicians and researchers make informed decisions when choosing or adapting a mind wandering or meta-awareness measure. This systematic review included 39 studies after 790 studies were assessed for eligibility. All studies operationalised mind wandering as instances of attention drift from a primary task. Three types of primary task were identified: (1) tasks adapted from computerised continuous performance tests (CPT) of sustained attention, (2) tasks involving focusing on the breath or a stream of aural beats, akin to in-vivo mindfulness meditation, (3) tasks involving an everyday life activity such as reading. Although data on mind wandering without meta-awareness (e.g., measured with probe-caught measures) was also obtained in many studies, such data was not always used in conjunction with self-caught mind wandering data to determine level of mind wandering meta-awareness. Few studies reported both reliability and validity of the measures used. This review shows that considerable methodological heterogeneity exists in the literature. Methodological variants of self-caught mind wandering methodologies are documented and examined, and suggestions for future research and clinical work are suggested.

摘要

思维漫游,也被称为与任务无关的思维,是指注意力从一个焦点任务或思维流中漂移。由于自我捕捉的思维漫游测量需要参与者自发地表明他们何时注意到自己的注意力漂移,因此自我捕捉方法提供了一种带有元意识的思维漫游测量方法。鉴于元意识在心理健康和心理干预中的作用,对现有的自我捕捉方法的概述将有助于临床医生和研究人员在选择或改编思维漫游或元意识测量时做出明智的决策。这项系统综述包括 39 项研究,在对 790 项研究进行资格评估后。所有的研究都将注意力从主要任务上的漂移操作化为思维漫游。确定了三种主要任务类型:(1) 从计算机化的持续性注意力 CPT 任务中改编的任务,(2) 涉及专注于呼吸或听觉节拍流的任务,类似于体内正念冥想,(3) 涉及阅读等日常生活活动的任务。尽管许多研究也获得了没有元意识的思维漫游的数据(例如,通过探针捕捉测量),但这些数据并不总是与自我捕捉的思维漫游数据一起用于确定思维漫游元意识的水平。很少有研究报告了所使用的测量方法的可靠性和有效性。本综述表明,文献中存在相当大的方法学异质性。自我捕捉思维漫游方法的方法学变体被记录和检查,并提出了未来研究和临床工作的建议。

相似文献

1
Self-caught methodologies for measuring mind wandering with meta-awareness: A systematic review.自我捕捉方法测量元意识下的心流:系统综述。
Conscious Cogn. 2023 Feb;108:103463. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2022.103463. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
2
Home treatment for mental health problems: a systematic review.心理健康问题的居家治疗:一项系统综述
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(15):1-139. doi: 10.3310/hta5150.
3
Behavioral interventions to reduce risk for sexual transmission of HIV among men who have sex with men.降低男男性行为者中艾滋病毒性传播风险的行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jul 16(3):CD001230. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001230.pub2.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.利用预后信息为乳腺癌患者选择辅助性全身治疗的成本效益
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
6
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
7
Survivor, family and professional experiences of psychosocial interventions for sexual abuse and violence: a qualitative evidence synthesis.性虐待和暴力的心理社会干预的幸存者、家庭和专业人员的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Oct 4;10(10):CD013648. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013648.pub2.
8
What is the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of using drugs in treating obese patients in primary care? A systematic review.在初级保健中使用药物治疗肥胖患者的临床效果和成本效益如何?系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(5):iii-xiv, 1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta16050.
9
Eliciting adverse effects data from participants in clinical trials.从临床试验参与者中获取不良反应数据。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 16;1(1):MR000039. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000039.pub2.
10
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of paclitaxel, docetaxel, gemcitabine and vinorelbine in non-small-cell lung cancer.对紫杉醇、多西他赛、吉西他滨和长春瑞滨在非小细胞肺癌中的临床疗效和成本效益进行的快速系统评价。
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(32):1-195. doi: 10.3310/hta5320.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relative Accuracy of Different Methods for Measuring Mind Wandering Subtypes: A Systematic Review.测量思维游荡亚型的不同方法的相对准确性:一项系统综述。
Brain Behav. 2025 Aug;15(8):e70764. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70764.
2
Further unpacking age-related differences in mind wandering: The roles of emotional valence and meta-awareness.进一步剖析与年龄相关的走神差异:情绪效价和元意识的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2025 May 1. doi: 10.3758/s13421-025-01713-0.
3
Using objective and subjective measures of mind wandering to predict progression to development of cognitive impairment and test associations with Alzheimer disease biomarkers.
使用思维游荡的客观和主观测量方法来预测认知障碍发展的进程,并测试与阿尔茨海默病生物标志物的关联。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2025 Apr;47(3):169-184. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2025.2498025. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
4
The brief mind wandering three-factor scale (BMW-3).简短思维漫游三因素量表(BMW-3)。
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec;56(8):8720-8744. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02500-6. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
5
Time, valence, and imagination: a comparative study of thoughts in restricted and unrestricted mind wandering.时间、效价和想象:限制和非限制思维漫游中思想的比较研究。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jul;88(5):1510-1521. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01969-2. Epub 2024 May 20.