Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA DRF/Joliot, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin Center, Gif-sur-Yvette, France; Université de Paris, Paris, France.
Cognitive Neuroimaging Unit, CEA DRF/Joliot, INSERM, Université Paris-Saclay, NeuroSpin Center, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Neuroimage. 2023 Mar;268:119849. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119849. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
Learning in a stochastic and changing environment is a difficult task. Models of learning typically postulate that observations that deviate from the learned predictions are surprising and used to update those predictions. Bayesian accounts further posit the existence of a confidence-weighting mechanism: learning should be modulated by the confidence level that accompanies those predictions. However, the neural bases of this confidence are much less known than the ones of surprise. Here, we used a dynamic probability learning task and high-field MRI to identify putative cortical regions involved in the representation of confidence about predictions during human learning. We devised a stringent test based on the conjunction of four criteria. We localized several regions in parietal and frontal cortices whose activity is sensitive to the confidence of an ideal observer, specifically so with respect to potential confounds (surprise and predictability), and in a way that is invariant to which item is predicted. We also tested for functionality in two ways. First, we localized regions whose activity patterns at the subject level showed an effect of both confidence and surprise in qualitative agreement with the confidence-weighting principle. Second, we found neural representations of ideal confidence that also accounted for subjective confidence. Taken together, those results identify a set of cortical regions potentially implicated in the confidence-weighting of learning.
在随机和不断变化的环境中学习是一项艰巨的任务。学习模型通常假定偏离学习预测的观察结果是令人惊讶的,并用于更新这些预测。贝叶斯理论进一步假设存在置信权重机制:学习应该受到伴随这些预测的置信水平的调节。然而,与惊讶的神经基础相比,这种置信的神经基础要少得多。在这里,我们使用动态概率学习任务和高磁场 MRI 来识别在人类学习过程中代表预测置信度的皮质区域。我们设计了一个严格的测试,基于四个标准的结合。我们定位了几个在顶叶和额叶皮层中的区域,其活动对理想观察者的置信度敏感,特别是相对于潜在的混杂因素(惊讶和可预测性),并且以与预测的项目无关的方式。我们还通过两种方式测试了功能。首先,我们定位了那些在个体水平上的活动模式既显示出置信度效应又显示出惊讶效应的区域,与置信权重原则定性一致。其次,我们找到了能够解释主观置信度的理想置信度的神经表示。总之,这些结果确定了一组皮质区域,它们可能与学习的置信权重有关。