Roeschl Tobias, Jano Anas M, Fochler Franziska, Grewe Mona M, Wacker Marlis, Meier Kirstin, Schmidt Christian, Maier Lars, Grewe Peter H
Clinic of Cardiology and Angiology, Klinikum Neumarkt, Neumarkt, Germany.
Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Germany.
Cardiol Cardiovasc Med. 2022;6(2):124-136. doi: 10.26502/fccm.92920250. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
There is a consensus, that Transradial-Access (TRA) for coronary procedures should be preferred over Transfemoral-Access (TFA). Previously, Forearm-Artery-Angiography (FA) was mainly performed when difficulties during the advancement of the guidewire/-catheter were encountered. We explored the implication of a Standardized Forearm-Angiography (SFA) on procedural success rates of TRA under real-world conditions.
In a single-center study, an all-comers-cohort of 1191 consecutive cases during 1/2020-12/2020 were assessed retrospectively. Primary TFA rates, crossover to TFA, reasons for Forearm-Artery-Access (FAA) failure, the prevalence of kinking at the level of the forearm and the occurrence of vascular complications were analyzed. Major forearm side branches including the common interosseus artery were assessed via SFA.
In 1191 consecutive procedures, primary FAA access was attempted in 97.9% of cases. Crossover to TFA after a primary or secondary FAA attempt was necessary in 2.8%. Severe kinking was the most frequent cause of FAA failure and occurred in 3.0% of attempts. A second or third FAA attempt to avoid TFA was successful in 81%. Severe kinking at the level of the forearm was reported in 1.8% of procedures.
This is the first study to provide detailed success rates of a primary FAA strategy combined with a Standardized-Forearm-Angiography (SFA) in an all-comers-cohort. While severe kinking proved to be a rare but relevant challenge for FAA success, the prevalence of arterial spasm was marginal. Multiple attempts of FAA to avoid TFA might be safe possibly due to collateral blood supply by the common interosseus artery.
对于冠状动脉手术,经桡动脉入路(TRA)应优先于经股动脉入路(TFA),这已达成共识。以前,当导丝/导管推进遇到困难时,主要进行前臂动脉造影(FA)。我们探讨了标准化前臂造影(SFA)在实际临床条件下对TRA手术成功率的影响。
在一项单中心研究中,对2020年1月至2020年12月期间连续1191例的所有患者队列进行回顾性评估。分析了主要TFA率、转为TFA的情况、前臂动脉入路(FAA)失败的原因、前臂水平的血管扭曲发生率以及血管并发症的发生情况。通过SFA评估包括骨间总动脉在内的主要前臂侧支。
在1191例连续手术中,97.9%的病例尝试了初次FAA入路。初次或二次FAA尝试后转为TFA的比例为2.8%。严重血管扭曲是FAA失败最常见的原因,在3.0%的尝试中出现。81%的患者通过第二次或第三次FAA尝试成功避免了TFA。1.8%的手术报告了前臂水平的严重血管扭曲。
这是第一项在所有患者队列中提供结合标准化前臂造影(SFA)的初次FAA策略详细成功率的研究。虽然严重血管扭曲被证明是FAA成功的一个罕见但相关的挑战,但动脉痉挛的发生率很低。多次尝试FAA以避免TFA可能是安全的,这可能是由于骨间总动脉的侧支血供。