• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前臂动脉入路行冠状动脉造影和 PCI 时困难血管解剖的发生率及预测因素。

Prevalence and predictors of difficult vascular anatomy in forearm artery access for coronary angiography and PCI.

机构信息

Clinic of Cardiology and Angiology, Klinikum Neumarkt, Neumarkt, Germany.

Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 29;12(1):13060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17435-1.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-17435-1
PMID:35906409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9338070/
Abstract

Transradial access has established as preferred access for cardiac catheterization. Difficult vascular anatomy (DVA) is a noticeable threat to procedural success. We retrospectively analyzed 1397 consecutive cardiac catheterizations to estimate prevalence and identify predictors of DVA. In the subclavian-innominate-aortic-region (SIAR), DVA was causing failure in 2.4% during right-sided vs. 0.7% in left-sided forearm-artery-access (FAA) attempts (χ = 5.1, p = 0.023). Independent predictors were advanced age [odds ratio (OR) 1.44 per 10-year increase, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.15 to 1.80, p = 0.001] and right FAA (OR 2.52, 95% CI 1.72 to 3.69, p < 0.001). In the radial-ulnar-brachial region (RUBR), DVA was causing failure in 2.5% during right-sided vs. 1.7% in left-sided FAA (χ = 0.77, p = 0.38). Independent predictors were age (OR 1.28 per 10-year increase, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.61, p = 0.04), lower height (OR 1.56 per 10-cm decrease, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.15, p = 0.008) and left FAA (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.45 to 3.18, p < 0.001). Bilateral DVA was causing procedural failure in 0.9% of patients. The prevalence of bilateral DVA was rare. Predictors in SIAR were right FAA and advanced age and in RUBR, left FAA, advanced age and lower height. Gender, arterial hypertension, body mass, STEMI and smoking were not associated with DVA.

摘要

经桡动脉入路已成为心脏导管插入术的首选入路。血管解剖困难(DVA)是程序成功的显著威胁。我们回顾性分析了 1397 例连续心脏导管插入术,以估计 DVA 的患病率并确定其预测因素。在锁骨下动脉-无名动脉-主动脉区域(SIAR),右侧桡动脉-肱动脉(FAA)入路中 DVA 导致失败的比例为 2.4%,而左侧为 0.7%(χ²=5.1,p=0.023)。独立预测因素为高龄[每增加 10 岁,优势比(OR)为 1.44,95%置信区间(CI)为 1.15 至 1.80,p=0.001]和右侧 FAA(OR 2.52,95%CI 为 1.72 至 3.69,p<0.001)。在桡动脉-尺动脉-肱动脉区域(RUBR),右侧桡动脉-肱动脉入路中 DVA 导致失败的比例为 2.5%,而左侧为 1.7%(χ²=0.77,p=0.38)。独立预测因素为年龄(每增加 10 岁,OR 为 1.28,95%CI 为 1.01 至 1.61,p=0.04)、较低的身高(每降低 10cm,OR 为 1.56,95%CI 为 1.13 至 2.15,p=0.008)和左侧 FAA(OR 2.15,95%CI 为 1.45 至 3.18,p<0.001)。双侧 DVA 导致程序失败的比例为 0.9%。双侧 DVA 的患病率罕见。SIAR 中的预测因素为右侧 FAA 和高龄,RUBR 中的预测因素为左侧 FAA、高龄和较低的身高。性别、动脉高血压、体重、STEMI 和吸烟与 DVA 无关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f8/9338070/988bd4dec821/41598_2022_17435_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f8/9338070/dda3d8a37b49/41598_2022_17435_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f8/9338070/0504435b2a7e/41598_2022_17435_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f8/9338070/988bd4dec821/41598_2022_17435_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f8/9338070/dda3d8a37b49/41598_2022_17435_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f8/9338070/0504435b2a7e/41598_2022_17435_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/19f8/9338070/988bd4dec821/41598_2022_17435_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence and predictors of difficult vascular anatomy in forearm artery access for coronary angiography and PCI.前臂动脉入路行冠状动脉造影和 PCI 时困难血管解剖的发生率及预测因素。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 29;12(1):13060. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-17435-1.
2
Standardized Forearm Angiography Increases Procedural Success Rates of Coronary Angiography and PCI: A Retrospective Analysis of an all-Comers Patient Cohort in a Real-Life Scenario.标准化前臂血管造影术可提高冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的手术成功率:一项真实场景下所有患者队列的回顾性分析。
Cardiol Cardiovasc Med. 2022;6(2):124-136. doi: 10.26502/fccm.92920250. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
3
Transradial right and left heart catheterizations: a comparison to traditional femoral approach.经桡动脉左右心导管检查:与传统股动脉途径的比较。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2006 Apr;67(4):585-8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.20678.
4
Feasibility limits of transradial primary percutaneous coronary intervention in acute myocardial infarction in the real life (TRAP-AMI).经桡动脉直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗急性心肌梗死的真实世界可行性限制(TRAP-AMI)。
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 30;168(2):1056-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.024. Epub 2012 Nov 16.
5
Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With History of CABG Undergoing Cardiac Catheterization Via the Radial Versus Femoral Approach.有冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)史的患者行经桡动脉与股动脉入路行心导管检查的特征和结局。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr 26;14(8):907-916. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.01.053. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
6
Feasibility of Distal Radial Access for Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single Center Experience.桡动脉远端入路用于冠状动脉造影和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的可行性:单中心经验
Cardiology. 2021;146(5):531-537. doi: 10.1159/000517076. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
7
Ultrasound evaluation of forearm arteries in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention via radial artery access: results of one-year follow-up.经桡动脉途径行冠状动脉介入治疗患者前臂动脉的超声评估:一年随访结果
Kardiol Pol. 2015;73(7):502-10. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2015.0029.
8
Comparison of Right and Left Upper Limb Arterial Variants in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Transradial Procedures.双侧经桡动脉入路患者的左右上肢动脉变异比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec;8(12):e002863. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002863.
9
A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的随机对比:RADIAL-CABG 试验(经桡动脉与股动脉入路行冠状动脉旁路移植血管造影和介入治疗的比较)。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2013 Nov;6(11):1138-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2013.08.004. Epub 2013 Oct 16.
10
Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影和介入治疗技术失败的预测因素
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1508-1513. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

引用本文的文献

1
The Prevalence of Difficult Vascular Anatomy in Transulnar Versus Transradial Access for Cardiac Catheterization in Propensity Score-Matched Cohorts.倾向评分匹配队列中经尺动脉与经桡动脉途径行心脏导管插入术时困难血管解剖结构的发生率
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 10;8(7):e71037. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.71037. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
Lower Patient Height and Weight Are Predisposing Factors for Complex Radial Arterial Catheterization.患者身高和体重较低是复杂桡动脉置管的易感因素。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 13;12(6):2225. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062225.

本文引用的文献

1
Radial artery access is associated with lower mortality in patients undergoing primary PCI: a report from the SWEDEHEART registry.桡动脉入路与行直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的患者的死亡率降低相关:来自 SWEDEHEART 注册研究的报告。
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2020 Jun;9(4):323-332. doi: 10.1177/2048872620908032.
2
Systematic review of alternative access for cardiac catheterization and percutaneous coronary intervention: Dorsal distal radial and ulnar artery catheterization.经桡动脉和尺动脉逆行入路行心导管术和经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的系统评价:远端背侧桡动脉和尺动脉入路。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Nov 1;94(5):706-713. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28398. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
3
Trans-brachial artery access for coronary artery procedures is feasible and safe: data from a single-center in Macau.
经肱动脉途径用于冠状动脉手术可行且安全:来自澳门单中心的数据。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2019 Jun 20;132(12):1478-1481. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000000274.
4
Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease.经桡动脉与经股动脉途径用于冠心病患者的诊断性冠状动脉造影及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD012318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012318.pub2.
5
Occlusion of right coronary artery by microembolization caused by excessive diagnostic catheter manipulation.因过度的诊断性导管操作导致微栓塞,进而引起右冠状动脉闭塞。
Ann Transl Med. 2018 Jan;6(1):20. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.12.22.
6
Safety and efficacy of ulnar artery approach for percutaneous cardiac catheterization: Systematic review and meta-analysis.经皮心脏导管插入术尺动脉入路的安全性和有效性:系统评价与荟萃分析。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jun;91(7):1273-1280. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27479. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
7
Predictors of Technical Failure in Transradial Coronary Angiography and Intervention.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影和介入治疗技术失败的预测因素
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Nov 1;120(9):1508-1513. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.07.049. Epub 2017 Jul 31.
8
Balloon-Assisted Tracking: A Solution to Severe Subclavian Tortuosity Encountered During Transradial Primary PCI.球囊辅助追踪:经桡动脉直接行冠状动脉介入治疗时严重锁骨下动脉迂曲的解决方案
Int J Angiol. 2016 Jun;25(2):134-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1552981. Epub 2015 May 25.
9
Comparison of Right and Left Upper Limb Arterial Variants in Patients Undergoing Bilateral Transradial Procedures.双侧经桡动脉入路患者的左右上肢动脉变异比较。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Dec;8(12):e002863. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.002863.
10
Strategies to overcome hostile subclavian anatomy during transradial coronary angiography and interventions: impact on fluoroscopy, procedural time, complications, and radial patency.经桡动脉冠状动脉造影及介入治疗中克服锁骨下动脉解剖结构不利因素的策略:对透视、手术时间、并发症及桡动脉通畅率的影响
J Interv Cardiol. 2014 Aug;27(4):428-34. doi: 10.1111/joic.12127. Epub 2014 May 11.