Suppr超能文献

局限型与系统性肉芽肿性多血管炎:法国血管炎研究组登记处的数据。

Localized versus systemic granulomatosis with polyangiitis: data from the French Vasculitis Study Group Registry.

机构信息

National Referral Center for Rare Systemic Autoimmune Diseases, Université de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Paris, France.

Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine Specialties, Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland.

出版信息

Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022 May 30;61(6):2464-2471. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keab719.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the main features at diagnosis and evolution over time of patients with localized granulomatosis with polyangiitis (L-GPA) compared with those of systemic GPA (S-GPA).

METHODS

EULAR definitions of L-GPA, i.e. upper and/or lower respiratory tract involvement, and S-GPA were applied to patients from the French Vasculitis Study Group Registry. L-GPA and S-GPA patients' characteristics at diagnosis and long-term outcomes were analysed and compared.

RESULTS

Among the 795 Registry patients, 79 (10%) had L-GPA. Their main clinical manifestations were rhinitis, lung nodules, sinusitis and otitis. L-GPA vs S-GPA patients at diagnosis, respectively, were younger, more frequently had saddle nose deformity or subglottic stenosis and were less often PR3-ANCA-positive. L-GPA vs S-GPA induction therapy less frequently included CYC but more often a combination of MTX and glucocorticoids; 64% of MTX-treated patients experienced disease progression within 18 months post-diagnosis. L- and S-GPA patients' estimated relapse-free-survival probabilities, relapse rates and refractory disease rates at each time point were comparable, but L-GPA patients had more frequent ENT and lung relapses, and higher overall survival rates (P<0.02). Over a median follow-up of 3.5 years, 18 (22.8%) L-GPA progressed to S-GPA, either as a relapse after a period in remission or more frequently in the context of refractory disease. L-GPA patients experienced more ENT-related damage.

CONCLUSIONS

The relapse risks of L-GPA and S-GPA were similar, but relapse patterns differed and L-GPA overall survival rate was higher. About one-quarter of L-GPA patients developed S-GPA over time, but without end-stage organ involvement.

摘要

目的

描述局限性肉芽肿伴多血管炎(L-GPA)患者与系统性 GPA(S-GPA)患者在诊断时的主要特征和随时间的演变。

方法

采用 EULAR 对 L-GPA(即上呼吸道和/或下呼吸道受累)和 S-GPA 的定义,对法国血管炎研究组登记处的患者进行应用。分析和比较 L-GPA 和 S-GPA 患者的诊断时特征和长期结局。

结果

在登记处的 795 例患者中,有 79 例(10%)为 L-GPA。其主要临床表现为鼻炎、肺结节、鼻窦炎和中耳炎。与 S-GPA 患者相比,L-GPA 患者在诊断时更年轻,更常出现鞍鼻畸形或声门下狭窄,抗蛋白酶 3 抗体(PR3-ANCA)阳性率较低。与 S-GPA 相比,L-GPA 患者诱导治疗较少使用环磷酰胺(CYC),但更常使用甲氨蝶呤(MTX)和糖皮质激素联合治疗;64%的 MTX 治疗患者在诊断后 18 个月内出现疾病进展。在每个时间点,L-GPA 和 S-GPA 患者的无复发生存率、复发率和难治性疾病率估计值均相似,但 L-GPA 患者更常出现 ENT 和肺部复发,总生存率更高(P<0.02)。在中位随访 3.5 年期间,18 例(22.8%)L-GPA 进展为 S-GPA,要么是在缓解期后复发,要么更常发生在难治性疾病的情况下。L-GPA 患者出现更多的 ENT 相关损害。

结论

L-GPA 和 S-GPA 的复发风险相似,但复发模式不同,L-GPA 的总生存率更高。随着时间的推移,约四分之一的 L-GPA 患者发展为 S-GPA,但没有终末期器官受累。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验