• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让患者和照护者参与初级保健中的患者安全:一项针对共同设计的患者安全指南的定性研究。

Involving patients and carers in patient safety in primary care: A qualitative study of a co-designed patient safety guide.

机构信息

NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research and Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):630-639. doi: 10.1111/hex.13673. Epub 2023 Jan 16.

DOI:10.1111/hex.13673
PMID:36645147
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10010084/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Involving patients is a key premise of national and international policies on patient safety, which requires understanding how patients or carers want to be involved and developing resources to support this. This paper examines patients' and carers' views of being involved in patient safety in primary care and their views of potentially using a co-designed patient safety guide for primary care (PSG-PC) to foster both involvement and their safety.

METHODS

A qualitative study using semistructured face-to-face interviews with 18 patients and/or carers in primary care. Interviews were transcribed and analysis was conducted using an inductive thematic approach.

RESULTS

Overall participants expressed enthusiasm for the PSG-PC as a tool to support patients and carers to be involved in patient safety in primary care. However, for some participants being involved in patient safety was seen as taking on the role of General Practitioner and had the potential to add an additional workload for patients. Participants' willingness or ability to be involved in patient safety was influenced by a range of factors including an invisible, often underacknowledged role of everyday safety for patients' interactions with primary care; the levels of involvement that patients wanted in their care and safety and the work of embedding the PSG-PC for patients into their routine interactions with primary care. Participants identified components of the PSG-PC that would be useful to them, in particular, if they had a responsibility for caring for a family member if they had more complex care or long-term conditions.

CONCLUSION

Involving patients and carers in patient safety needs a tailored and personalized approach that enables patients and carers to use resources like the PSG-PC routinely and helps challenge assumptions about their willingness and ability to be involved in patient safety. Doing so would raise awareness of opportunities to be involved in safety in line with personal preference.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

Patient and public involvement were central to the research study. This included working in partnership to develop the PSG-PC with patients and carers and throughout our study including in the design of the study, recruiting participants, interpretation of findings.

摘要

背景

让患者参与是国家和国际患者安全政策的关键前提,这需要了解患者或护理人员希望如何参与,并开发资源来支持这一点。本文研究了患者和护理人员在初级保健中参与患者安全的观点,以及他们对使用共同设计的初级保健患者安全指南(PSG-PC)来促进参与和安全的看法。

方法

采用半结构化面对面访谈的方法,对初级保健中的 18 名患者和/或护理人员进行了定性研究。对访谈进行了转录,并采用归纳主题方法进行了分析。

结果

总体而言,参与者对 PSG-PC 作为支持患者和护理人员参与初级保健患者安全的工具表示热情。然而,对于一些参与者来说,参与患者安全被视为承担全科医生的角色,并且有可能给患者增加额外的工作量。参与者参与患者安全的意愿或能力受到多种因素的影响,包括患者与初级保健互动中日常安全的无形、往往未被充分认识的角色;患者希望在其护理和安全方面的参与程度以及将 PSG-PC 嵌入患者与初级保健的日常互动中的工作。参与者确定了 PSG-PC 对他们有用的组件,特别是如果他们有照顾家庭成员的责任,如果他们有更复杂的护理或长期疾病。

结论

让患者和护理人员参与患者安全需要采取量身定制和个性化的方法,使患者和护理人员能够常规使用 PSG-PC 等资源,并有助于挑战他们参与患者安全的意愿和能力的假设。这样做将提高对参与安全的机会的认识,符合个人偏好。

患者或公众的贡献

患者和公众的参与是研究的核心。这包括与患者和护理人员合作共同开发 PSG-PC,并在我们的研究中包括在研究设计、参与者招募、结果解释中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0629/10010084/b614827df7c2/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0629/10010084/b614827df7c2/HEX-26--g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0629/10010084/b614827df7c2/HEX-26--g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Involving patients and carers in patient safety in primary care: A qualitative study of a co-designed patient safety guide.让患者和照护者参与初级保健中的患者安全:一项针对共同设计的患者安全指南的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Apr;26(2):630-639. doi: 10.1111/hex.13673. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
2
Developing a patient safety guide for primary care: A co-design approach involving patients, carers and clinicians.制定初级保健患者安全指南:涉及患者、护理人员和临床医生的共同设计方法。
Health Expect. 2021 Feb;24(1):42-52. doi: 10.1111/hex.13143. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
3
Dementia and patient safety in the community: a qualitative study of family carers' protective practices and implications for services.痴呆症和社区患者安全:对家庭护理者保护措施及其对服务影响的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Sep 5;19(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4478-2.
4
EQUIP training the trainers: an evaluation of a training programme for service users and carers involved in training mental health professionals in user-involved care planning.EQUIP培训培训者:对一项针对参与精神卫生专业人员用户参与式护理计划培训的服务使用者和护理者的培训项目的评估。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):367-376. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12361. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
5
Family carers' experiences and perceived roles in interprofessional collaborative practice in primary care: A constructivist grounded theory study.家庭照顾者在初级保健中的跨专业协作实践中的经验和感知角色:建构主义扎根理论研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Dec;26(6):2302-2311. doi: 10.1111/hex.13828. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
6
Enhancing primary care support for informal carers: A scoping study with professional stakeholders.增强对非正式护老者的基层医疗支持:与专业利益相关者的范围界定研究。
Health Soc Care Community. 2020 Mar;28(2):642-650. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12898. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
7
Parents' and carers' views about emollients for childhood eczema: qualitative interview study.父母及照顾者对儿童湿疹润肤剂的看法:定性访谈研究
BMJ Open. 2016 Aug 19;6(8):e011887. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-011887.
8
Patients', carers' and healthcare providers' views of patient-held health records in Kerala, India: A qualitative exploratory study.印度喀拉拉邦患者、照顾者和医疗保健提供者对患者持有的健康记录的看法:一项定性探索性研究。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1081-1095. doi: 10.1111/hex.13721. Epub 2023 Feb 13.
9
Not sick enough: Experiences of carers of people with mental illness negotiating care for their relatives with mental health services.病情还不够严重:精神病患者照料者在与心理健康服务机构协商为其亲属提供护理时的经历。
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2017 Aug;24(6):403-411. doi: 10.1111/jpm.12399.
10
Protocol for a non-randomised feasibility study evaluating a codesigned patient safety guide in primary care.一项评估基层医疗中共同设计的患者安全指南的非随机可行性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e039752. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039752.

引用本文的文献

1
Promoting Patient Safety Through Patient Engagement at the Organisational Level: A Delphi-Based Needs Assessment Among Patient and Family Advisory Councils.通过组织层面的患者参与促进患者安全:患者及家属咨询委员会基于德尔菲法的需求评估
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70319. doi: 10.1111/hex.70319.
2
Patient and family engagement interventions in primary care patient safety: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.基层医疗患者安全中的患者及家属参与干预措施:随机对照试验的系统评价与荟萃分析
Br J Gen Pract. 2025 Jun 26;75(756):e491-e499. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2024.0369. Print 2025 Jul.
3
Systematic review on the frequency and quality of reporting patient and public involvement in patient safety research.

本文引用的文献

1
The problem with making Safety-II work in healthcare.在医疗保健领域应用“安全-II”模式所存在的问题。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2022 May;31(5):402-408. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014396. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
2
'Reluctant pioneer': A qualitative study of doctors' experiences as patients with long COVID.“不情愿的先驱者”:一项关于医生作为长新冠患者的体验的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2021 Jun;24(3):833-842. doi: 10.1111/hex.13223. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
3
Protocol for a non-randomised feasibility study evaluating a codesigned patient safety guide in primary care.
关于患者及公众参与患者安全研究报告的频率与质量的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 26;24(1):532. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11021-z.
4
Enhancing Patient Safety Culture in Hospitals.加强医院患者安全文化。
Cureus. 2023 Dec 27;15(12):e51159. doi: 10.7759/cureus.51159. eCollection 2023 Dec.
5
Patient safety in remote primary care encounters: multimethod qualitative study combining Safety I and Safety II analysis.远程初级保健中患者安全:结合安全 I 和安全 II 分析的多方法定性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Aug 16;33(9):573-586. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2023-016674.
一项评估基层医疗中共同设计的患者安全指南的非随机可行性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 20;11(1):e039752. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039752.
4
Developing a patient safety guide for primary care: A co-design approach involving patients, carers and clinicians.制定初级保健患者安全指南:涉及患者、护理人员和临床医生的共同设计方法。
Health Expect. 2021 Feb;24(1):42-52. doi: 10.1111/hex.13143. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
5
A simple method to assess and report thematic saturation in qualitative research.一种评估和报告定性研究主题饱和度的简单方法。
PLoS One. 2020 May 5;15(5):e0232076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232076. eCollection 2020.
6
Prevalence, severity, and nature of preventable patient harm across medical care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗保健环境中可预防的患者伤害的发生率、严重程度和性质:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2019 Jul 17;366:l4185. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4185.
7
How older people enact care involvement during transition from hospital to home: A systematic review and model.老年人如何在从医院到家庭的过渡期间参与护理:系统评价和模型。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):883-893. doi: 10.1111/hex.12930. Epub 2019 Jul 13.
8
Patients' Conceptualizations of Responsibility for Healthcare: A Typology for Understanding Differing Attributions in the Context of Patient Safety.患者对医疗保健责任的概念化:理解患者安全背景下不同归因的类型学。
J Health Soc Behav. 2019 Jun;60(2):188-203. doi: 10.1177/0022146519849027. Epub 2019 May 22.
9
Using the candidacy framework to understand how doctor-patient interactions influence perceived eligibility to seek help for cancer alarm symptoms: a qualitative interview study.利用候选框架理解医患互动如何影响对癌症警报症状寻求帮助的可及性感知:一项定性访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Dec 4;18(1):937. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3730-5.
10
Frequency and nature of potentially harmful preventable problems in primary care from the patient's perspective with clinician review: a population-level survey in Great Britain.从患者角度看临床医生审查下初级保健中潜在有害可预防问题的频率和性质:英国的一项基于人群的调查。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 13;8(6):e020952. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020952.