• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Maximizing the Accuracy of Adolescent Concussion Diagnosis Using Individual Elements of Common Standardized Clinical Assessment Tools.最大化利用常见标准化临床评估工具的个体要素来提高青少年脑震荡诊断的准确性。
J Athl Train. 2023 Nov 1;58(11-12):962-973. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0020.22.
2
Optimizing the Combination of Common Clinical Concussion Batteries to Predict Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms in a Prospective Cohort of Concussed Youth.优化常见临床脑震荡检测组合以预测青少年脑震荡后持续性症状的前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(3):811-821. doi: 10.1177/03635465231222936. Epub 2024 Feb 2.
3
Visio-Vestibular Deficits in Healthy Child and Adolescent Athletes.健康儿童和青少年运动员的视-前庭功能障碍。
Clin J Sport Med. 2022 Jul 1;32(4):376-384. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000955. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
King-Devick Sensitivity and Specificity to Concussion in Collegiate Athletes.金-德维克测试对大学生运动员脑震荡的敏感性和特异性。
J Athl Train. 2023 Feb 1;58(2):97-105. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0063.21.
5
Relationship Between the King-Devick Test and Commonly Used Concussion Tests at Baseline.基线时 King-Devick 测试与常用脑震荡测试的关系。
J Athl Train. 2019 Dec;54(12):1247-1253. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-455-18. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
6
Diagnosis of Sports-Related Concussion Using Symptom Report or Standardized Assessment of Concussion.使用症状报告或 concussion 的标准化评估来诊断与运动相关的 concussion。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2416223. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.16223.
7
Assessment of Saccades and Gaze Stability in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Concussion.评估眼球急动和注视稳定性在儿科脑震荡诊断中的应用。
Clin J Sport Med. 2022 Mar 1;32(2):108-113. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000897.
8
Utility of VOMS, SCAT3, and ImPACT Baseline Evaluations for Acute Concussion Identification in Collegiate Athletes: Findings From the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium.VOMS、SCAT3和ImPACT基线评估在大学生运动员急性脑震荡识别中的效用:来自美国大学体育协会-国防部脑震荡评估、研究与教育(CARE)联盟的研究结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(4):1106-1119. doi: 10.1177/03635465211072261. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
9
The Variability of Recovery From Pediatric Concussion Using Multimodal Clinical Definitions.采用多模态临床定义评估儿童脑震荡的恢复变异性。
Sports Health. 2024 Jan-Feb;16(1):79-88. doi: 10.1177/19417381231152448. Epub 2023 Mar 10.
10
Predictive Accuracy of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3 and Vestibular/Ocular-Motor Screening, Individually and In Combination: A National Collegiate Athletic Association-Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium Analysis.运动性脑震荡评估工具 3 和前庭/眼动筛查的预测准确性:个体和联合应用:国家大学体育协会-国防部脑震荡评估、研究和教育联合会分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;49(4):1040-1048. doi: 10.1177/0363546520988098. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing the Combination of Common Clinical Concussion Batteries to Predict Persistent Postconcussion Symptoms in a Prospective Cohort of Concussed Youth.优化常见临床脑震荡检测组合以预测青少年脑震荡后持续性症状的前瞻性队列研究。
Am J Sports Med. 2024 Mar;52(3):811-821. doi: 10.1177/03635465231222936. Epub 2024 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessment of Saccades and Gaze Stability in the Diagnosis of Pediatric Concussion.评估眼球急动和注视稳定性在儿科脑震荡诊断中的应用。
Clin J Sport Med. 2022 Mar 1;32(2):108-113. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000897.
2
Evaluation and Management of Pediatric Concussion in the Acute Setting.儿科急性脑震荡的评估与管理。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Jul 1;37(7):371-379. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002498.
3
Visio-Vestibular Deficits in Healthy Child and Adolescent Athletes.健康儿童和青少年运动员的视-前庭功能障碍。
Clin J Sport Med. 2022 Jul 1;32(4):376-384. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000955. Epub 2021 Jun 22.
4
Predictive Accuracy of the Sport Concussion Assessment Tool 3 and Vestibular/Ocular-Motor Screening, Individually and In Combination: A National Collegiate Athletic Association-Department of Defense Concussion Assessment, Research and Education Consortium Analysis.运动性脑震荡评估工具 3 和前庭/眼动筛查的预测准确性:个体和联合应用:国家大学体育协会-国防部脑震荡评估、研究和教育联合会分析。
Am J Sports Med. 2021 Mar;49(4):1040-1048. doi: 10.1177/0363546520988098. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
Post-concussion symptom burden in children following motor vehicle collisions.机动车碰撞后儿童的脑震荡后症状负担
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2020 Apr 24;1(5):938-946. doi: 10.1002/emp2.12056. eCollection 2020 Oct.
6
Reliability of the visio-vestibular examination for concussion among providers in a pediatric emergency department.儿科急诊中检查者行视-前庭检查评估脑震荡的可靠性。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Sep;38(9):1847-1853. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.020. Epub 2020 Jun 11.
7
Relationship Between the King-Devick Test and Commonly Used Concussion Tests at Baseline.基线时 King-Devick 测试与常用脑震荡测试的关系。
J Athl Train. 2019 Dec;54(12):1247-1253. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-455-18. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
8
Clinical and Device-based Metrics of Gait and Balance in Diagnosing Youth Concussion.临床和基于设备的步态和平衡指标在诊断青少年脑震荡中的应用。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Mar;52(3):542-548. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002163.
9
Performance Times for the King-Devick Test in Children and Adolescents.儿童和青少年 King-Devick 测试的表现时间。
Clin J Sport Med. 2019 Sep;29(5):374-378. doi: 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000670.
10
Acute Sport Concussion Assessment Optimization: A Prospective Assessment from the CARE Consortium.急性运动性脑震荡评估优化:来自 CARE 联盟的前瞻性评估。
Sports Med. 2019 Dec;49(12):1977-1987. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01155-0.

最大化利用常见标准化临床评估工具的个体要素来提高青少年脑震荡诊断的准确性。

Maximizing the Accuracy of Adolescent Concussion Diagnosis Using Individual Elements of Common Standardized Clinical Assessment Tools.

机构信息

Center for Injury Research and Prevention, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA.

Division of Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2023 Nov 1;58(11-12):962-973. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0020.22.

DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-0020.22
PMID:36645832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10784885/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Multiple clinical evaluation tools exist for adolescent concussion with various degrees of correlation, presenting challenges for clinicians in identifying which elements of these tools provide the greatest diagnostic utility.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the combination of elements from 4 commonly used clinical concussion batteries that maximize discrimination of adolescents with concussion from those without concussion.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Suburban school and concussion program of a tertiary care academic center.

PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS

A total of 231 participants with concussion (from a suburban school and a concussion program) and 166 participants without concussion (from a suburban school) between the ages of 13 and 19 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Individual elements of the visio-vestibular examination (VVE), Sport Concussion Assessment Tool, fifth edition (SCAT5; including the modified Balance Error Scoring System), King-Devick test (K-D), and Postconcussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI) were evaluated. The 24 subcomponents of these tests were grouped into interpretable factors using sparse principal component analysis. The 13 resultant factors were combined with demographic and clinical covariates into a logistic regression model and ranked by frequency of inclusion into the ideal model, and the predictive performance of the ideal model was compared with each of the clinical batteries using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

A cluster of 4 factors (factor 1 [VVE saccades and vestibulo-ocular reflex], factor 2 [modified Balance Error Scoring System double-legged stance], factor 3 [SCAT5/PCSI symptom scores], and factor 4 [K-D completion time]) emerged. A model fit with the top factors performed as well as each battery in predicting concussion status (AUC = 0.816 [95% CI = 0.731, 0.889]) compared with the SCAT5 (AUC = 0.784 [95% CI = 0.692, 0.866]), PCSI (AUC = 0.776 [95% CI = 0.674, 0.863]), VVE (AUC = 0.711 [95% CI = 0.602, 0.814]), and K-D (AUC = 0.708 [95% CI = 0.590, 0.819]).

CONCLUSIONS

A multifaceted assessment for adolescents with concussion, comprising symptoms, attention, balance, and the visio-vestibular system, is critical. Current diagnostic batteries likely measure overlapping domains, and the sparse principal component analysis demonstrated strategies for streamlining comprehensive concussion assessment across a variety of settings.

摘要

背景

有多种用于青少年脑震荡的临床评估工具,它们之间的相关性各不相同,这给临床医生确定这些工具中的哪些元素具有最大的诊断效用带来了挑战。

目的

确定 4 种常用临床脑震荡电池中元素的组合,最大限度地提高对患有脑震荡和未患有脑震荡的青少年的区分能力。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

郊区学校和三级护理学术中心的脑震荡计划。

患者或其他参与者

年龄在 13 至 19 岁之间的 231 名脑震荡患者(来自郊区学校和脑震荡计划)和 166 名无脑震荡患者(来自郊区学校)。

主要观察指标

评估视-前庭检查(VVE)、运动性脑震荡评估工具第五版(SCAT5,包括改良平衡错误评分系统)、King-Devick 测试(K-D)和脑震荡后症状量表(PCSI)的各个元素。使用稀疏主成分分析将这些测试的 24 个子成分组合成可解释的因子。将这 13 个因子与人口统计学和临床协变量相结合,纳入逻辑回归模型,并根据其纳入理想模型的频率进行排序,然后使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC)比较理想模型与每个临床电池的预测性能。

结果

出现了 4 个因子簇(因子 1 [VVE 眼球运动和前庭眼反射]、因子 2 [改良平衡错误评分系统双腿站立]、因子 3 [SCAT5/PCSI 症状评分]和因子 4 [K-D 完成时间])。具有最佳因子的模型在预测脑震荡状态方面的表现与每个电池一样好(AUC = 0.816[95%CI=0.731,0.889]),与 SCAT5(AUC = 0.784[95%CI=0.692,0.866])、PCSI(AUC = 0.776[95%CI=0.674,0.863])、VVE(AUC = 0.711[95%CI=0.602,0.814])和 K-D(AUC = 0.708[95%CI=0.590,0.819])相比。

结论

对患有脑震荡的青少年进行多方面评估,包括症状、注意力、平衡和视-前庭系统,至关重要。目前的诊断电池可能测量重叠的领域,稀疏主成分分析显示了在各种环境中简化全面脑震荡评估的策略。