Zwicker P, Meng M, Friesecke S, Stein T, Herzog A, Herzer C, Kammerlander M, Gebhardt T, Kugler C, Kramer A
Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, University Medicine, Greifswald, Germany; Section Antiseptic Stewardship of the German Society of Hospital Hygiene, Berlin, Germany.
Institute of Nursing Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany; Federal Institute for Vocational Education and Training (VET), Bonn, Germany.
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Mar;133:73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2022.12.017. Epub 2023 Jan 14.
Pathogens causing infections are in many cases transmitted via the hands of personnel. Thus, hand antisepsis has strong epidemiological evidence of infection prevention. Depending on various factors, hand antisepsis adherence ranges between 9.1% and 85.2%.
To evaluate a new transponder system that reminded medical staff to use an alcohol-based hand rub based on indication by giving real-time feedback, to detect hand antisepsis adherence.
The monitoring system consisted of three components: a portable transponder detecting alcohol-based hand rub and able to give feedback; a beacon recognizing entries to and exits from the patient's surroundings; and a sensor placed at the hand-rub dispensers to count the number of hand rubs. With these components, the system provided feedback when hand antisepsis was not conducted although it was necessary according to moments 1, 4, and 5 of hand antisepsis. Adherence was measured in two use-cases with five phases, starting with the baseline measurement followed by intervention periods and phases without intervention to test the sustainability of the feedback.
Using the monitoring system, hand antisepsis adherence was increased by up to 104.5% in comparison to the baseline measurement. When the intervention ceased, however, hand antisepsis adherence decreased to less than or equal to the baseline measurement.
A short-term intervention alone is not sufficient to lead to a long-term change in hand antisepsis adherence. Rather, permanent feedback and/or the integration in a multi-modal intervention strategy are necessary.
在许多情况下,引起感染的病原体是通过工作人员的手传播的。因此,手部消毒在预防感染方面有强有力的流行病学证据。根据各种因素,手部消毒的依从率在9.1%至85.2%之间。
评估一种新的应答器系统,该系统根据指征通过实时反馈提醒医务人员使用含酒精的擦手液,以检测手部消毒的依从情况。
监测系统由三个部分组成:一个便携式应答器,用于检测含酒精的擦手液并能够提供反馈;一个信标,用于识别进入和离开患者周围环境的情况;以及一个放置在擦手液分配器处的传感器,用于计算擦手液的使用次数。通过这些组件,当根据手部消毒的时刻1、4和5需要进行手部消毒但未进行时,系统会提供反馈。在两个有五个阶段的用例中测量依从性,从基线测量开始,随后是干预期和无干预阶段,以测试反馈的可持续性。
与基线测量相比,使用监测系统后,手部消毒的依从率提高了高达104.5%。然而,当干预停止时,手部消毒的依从率下降到小于或等于基线测量值。
仅短期干预不足以导致手部消毒依从性的长期改变。相反,需要持续反馈和/或整合到多模式干预策略中。