• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利益相关者参与设计具有政策意义的离散选择实验属性:瑞士两项医疗服务提供研究实例

Stakeholder Engagement in Designing Attributes for a Discrete Choice Experiment With Policy Implications: An Example of 2 Swiss Studies on Healthcare Delivery.

机构信息

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland; Interface Politikstudien Forschung Beratung, Lucerne, Switzerland.

Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Value Health. 2023 Jun;26(6):925-933. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jval.2023.01.002
PMID:36646277
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The use of discrete choice experiments (DCEs) has become increasingly popular in health policy development by involving and analyzing the preferences of target groups for different aspects of the policy intervention. In this article, we aim to contribute to the standardization of the process of attribute and attribute level development for DCEs with policy relevance. To do so, we propose and empirically illustrate a framework tool for the development and reporting of attributes and attribute levels, with the systematic engagement of relevant stakeholders.

METHODS

The framework tool was kept general to allow its use as a standard reporting approach on the development process of a DCE, involving relevant stakeholders at each stage. The proposed 3-stage process consists of (1) collection, (2) selection, and (3) refinement of the DCE attributes and attribute levels. The application of the framework tool is illustrated by 2 projects, Health2040 and COCONUTS-both concerning the preferences of the Swiss population for the future organization of healthcare.

RESULTS

By engaging stakeholders, we identified and included attributes and attribute levels that would not have been identified solely through the existing literature. In addition, including multiple stakeholders from different professional backgrounds ensured that the selected attributes and attribute levels were policy relevant, were applicable in practice, and reflected the opinions of multiple actors in healthcare.

CONCLUSION

The proposed framework helps to strengthen the standardization of the reporting on attribute and attribute level development with stakeholder engagement and to guide future research teams designing a DCE with policy implications.

摘要

目的

通过让目标群体参与并分析其对政策干预不同方面的偏好,离散选择实验(DCE)在卫生政策制定中的应用越来越广泛。本文旨在为具有政策相关性的 DCE 属性和属性水平开发过程的标准化做出贡献。为此,我们提出并通过实证说明了一个框架工具,用于开发和报告具有系统利益相关者参与的属性和属性水平。

方法

该框架工具保持通用性,以允许其作为 DCE 开发过程的标准报告方法使用,在每个阶段都涉及相关利益相关者。所提出的三阶段流程包括(1)收集、(2)选择和(3)细化 DCE 属性和属性水平。通过 Health2040 和 COCONUTS 这两个项目来举例说明该框架工具的应用,这两个项目都涉及瑞士人口对未来医疗保健组织的偏好。

结果

通过让利益相关者参与,我们确定并纳入了仅通过现有文献无法识别的属性和属性水平。此外,纳入来自不同专业背景的多个利益相关者,确保了所选属性和属性水平具有政策相关性、适用于实践,并反映了医疗保健领域多个参与者的意见。

结论

该框架有助于加强报告具有利益相关者参与的属性和属性水平开发的标准化,并指导未来具有政策影响的 DCE 设计的研究团队。

相似文献

1
Stakeholder Engagement in Designing Attributes for a Discrete Choice Experiment With Policy Implications: An Example of 2 Swiss Studies on Healthcare Delivery.利益相关者参与设计具有政策意义的离散选择实验属性:瑞士两项医疗服务提供研究实例
Value Health. 2023 Jun;26(6):925-933. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2023.01.002. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
2
Patient and Public Preferences for Coordinated Care in Switzerland: Development of a Discrete Choice Experiment.瑞士协调护理的患者和公众偏好:离散选择实验的制定。
Patient. 2022 Jul;15(4):485-496. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00568-2. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
3
Developing attributes and attribute-levels for a discrete choice experiment on micro health insurance in rural Malawi.为马拉维农村地区的小额健康保险离散选择实验开发属性和属性水平。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 May 22;14:235. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-235.
4
Application of discrete choice experiments to enhance stakeholder engagement as a strategy for advancing implementation: a systematic review.离散选择实验在增强利益相关者参与度方面的应用:推进实施的一种策略——系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 23;12(1):140. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0675-8.
5
DCE attribute development investigating public policy for the provision of medicinal cannabis.探索药用大麻供应的公共政策的 DCE 属性开发。
J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):1232-1244. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2405288. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
6
Stakeholders' preferences for the design and delivery of virtual care services: A systematic review of discrete choice experiments.利益相关者对虚拟护理服务设计与提供的偏好:离散选择实验的系统评价
Soc Sci Med. 2024 Jan;340:116459. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116459. Epub 2023 Nov 30.
7
Risk as an attribute in discrete choice experiments: a systematic review of the literature.作为离散选择实验中一个属性的风险:文献的系统综述
Patient. 2014;7(2):151-70. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0048-1.
8
Attribute development and level selection for a discrete choice experiment to elicit the preferences of health care providers for capitation payment mechanism in Kenya.肯尼亚用于引出医疗服务提供者对按人头付费机制偏好的离散选择实验的属性开发与水平选择
Health Econ Rev. 2019 Oct 30;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13561-019-0247-5.
9
A Systematic Review of Discrete Choice Experiments and Conjoint Analysis on Genetic Testing.关于基因检测的离散选择实验和联合分析的系统评价。
Patient. 2022 Jan;15(1):39-54. doi: 10.1007/s40271-021-00531-1. Epub 2021 Jun 4.
10
Patients' preferences for primary health care - a systematic literature review of discrete choice experiments.患者对初级卫生保健的偏好——离散选择实验的系统文献综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Jul 11;17(1):476. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2433-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Engaging primary care professionals in OECD's international PaRIS survey: a documentary analysis.参与经合组织国际 PaRIS 调查的初级保健专业人员:文献分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Jul 4;22(1):76. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01170-2.
2
Pretesting Discrete-Choice Experiments: A Guide for Researchers.预测试离散选择实验:研究人员指南。
Patient. 2024 Mar;17(2):109-120. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00672-z. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
3
Assessing healthcare capacity crisis preparedness: development of an evaluation tool by a Canadian health authority.
评估医疗保健能力危机准备情况:加拿大卫生当局制定评估工具。
Front Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;11:1231738. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1231738. eCollection 2023.