College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
College of Education, Psychology, and Social Work, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
J Cancer Surviv. 2024 Jun;18(3):818-827. doi: 10.1007/s11764-023-01331-2. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
Cancer survivors are at greater risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) than cancer-free controls. Despite evidence-based guidelines recommending CVD risk factor assessment, surveillance and risk-reduction, many people with cancer do not receive adequate CVD care. To address potential barriers and enablers of care, we examined healthcare professionals' (HCPs) perceptions and experiences of CVD risk assessment and management in people with cancer.
We conducted one focus group and 12 individual interviews to examine HCPs' perceptions and experiences of CVD care in care. We used reflexive thematic analysis to collect and analyse the qualitative data to construct and understand themes.
Twenty-one HCPs participated (8 oncologists, 5 nurses, 3 general practitioners, 2 dietitians, 1 cardiologist, 1 haematologist and 1 physiotherapist). Majority of HCPs were aware of CVD risk in cancer but were concerned they could not deliver CVD care alone due to system-level barriers including lack of time and training. HCPs also perceived patient-level barriers including socioeconomic disadvantage and fatalistic outlook. Despite barriers, HCPs suggested diverse solutions for improving CVD care in cancer including new models-of-care, clinical pathways, risk assessment/management tools and education.
The diversity of perceived barriers and suggested solutions identified by HCPs suggests the need for a multilevel approach tailored to context. Future research involving people with cancer is needed to co-design acceptable interventions.
Improved understanding of HCP's perceptions can inform the development of new interventions to deliver CVD care to people with cancer to reduce morbidity and mortality.
癌症幸存者患心血管疾病(CVD)的风险高于无癌症对照者。尽管有循证指南建议评估 CVD 风险因素、监测和降低风险,但许多癌症患者并未得到足够的 CVD 护理。为了解决潜在的护理障碍和促进因素,我们研究了医疗保健专业人员(HCP)对癌症患者 CVD 风险评估和管理的看法和经验。
我们进行了一次焦点小组和 12 次个别访谈,以研究 HCP 在护理中对 CVD 护理的看法和经验。我们使用反思性主题分析来收集和分析定性数据,以构建和理解主题。
21 名 HCP 参与了研究(8 名肿瘤学家、5 名护士、3 名全科医生、2 名营养师、1 名心脏病专家、1 名血液学家和 1 名物理治疗师)。大多数 HCP 意识到癌症中的 CVD 风险,但由于系统层面的障碍,如缺乏时间和培训,他们担心自己无法单独提供 CVD 护理。HCP 还认为存在患者层面的障碍,包括社会经济劣势和宿命论观点。尽管存在障碍,但 HCP 提出了改善癌症中 CVD 护理的各种解决方案,包括新的护理模式、临床路径、风险评估/管理工具和教育。
HCP 感知到的障碍和提出的解决方案的多样性表明需要采取针对具体情况的多层次方法。需要涉及癌症患者的未来研究来共同设计可接受的干预措施。
更好地了解 HCP 的看法可以为开发新的干预措施提供信息,以向癌症患者提供 CVD 护理,从而降低发病率和死亡率。